Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Infusion of 2.5 meq/min of lactic acid minimally increases CO2 production compared to an isocaloric glucose infusion in healthy anesthetized, mechanically ventilated pigs

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1Email author
Critical Care201317:R268

https://doi.org/10.1186/cc13098

  • Received: 27 March 2013
  • Accepted: 22 October 2013
  • Published:

Abstract

Introduction

Blood acidification by lactic acid infusion converts bicarbonate to CO2. This effect can be exploited to increase the transmembrane PCO2 gradient of an extracorporeal membrane lung, resulting in a significant increase of extracorporeal CO2 removal. Lactic acid, however, is an energetic substrate and its metabolism might increase total body CO2 production (VCO2), limiting the potential beneficial effects of this technique. The aim of our study was to compare VCO during isocaloric infusion of lactic acid or glucose.

Methods

Six pigs (45±5 kg) were sedated and mechanically ventilated. Estimated caloric needs were 2,300–2,400 Kcal/die (95 to 100 Kcal/h). A sequence of two steps lasting four hours each was performed: 1) Glucose, 97 kcal/h were administered as 50% glucose solution, and 2) Lactic Acid, approximately 48.5 kcal/h were administered as lactic acid and approximately 48.5 kcal/h as 50% glucose solution. This sequence was repeated three times with two-hour intervals. Every hour VCO, arterial blood gases and lactate were measured. Blood glucose level was kept constant by titrating an insulin infusion, ventilation was adjusted to maintain arterial PCO2 at 50 mmHg, a normal value for our animal model.

Results

During Lactic Acid steps VCO2 increased less than 5% compared to the Glucose steps (282 vs. 269 ml/min, P<0.05); blood glucose did not differ between the two groups (respectively 101 ± 12 vs. 103±8 mg/dl). Arterial lactate was always lower than 3 mmol/L. Arterial pH was lower during Lactic Acid steps (7.422 vs. 7.445, P<0.05).

Conclusions

Replacing 50% of the caloric input with lactic acid increased total CO2 production by less than 5% compared to an equal caloric load provided entirely by a 50% glucose solution.

Keywords

  • Lactic Acid
  • Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
  • Total Caloric Intake
  • Extracorporeal Circuit
  • Arterial PCO2

Introduction

Partial extracorporeal CO2 removal (ECCO2R), initially introduced in the late 1970s [15], allows ultra-protective mechanical ventilation, and might help limit Ventilation-Induced Lung Injury (VILI) in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) patients [6]. Moreover, it may enable awake hypercapnic patients [7, 8] or patients awaiting lung transplantation to avoid endotracheal intubation [7, 9]. Despite major improvements in extracorporeal technology, moderate/high extracorporeal blood flow rates (500 to 1,000 ml/minute) [10, 11] are still required to remove a significant fraction (for example, 50%) of the total CO2 production of an adult patient. This implies the use of large diameter vascular catheters and specific technical requirements that limit the application of the procedure. The rate of CO2 removal is limited by the fact that most of the CO2 in blood (approximately, 90%) is present as bicarbonate ion that cannot cross the artificial lung membrane, which is permeable to gases but not to solutes and water. Acid infusion shifts bicarbonate dissociation to the gaseous CO2 form, dramatically increasing the transmembrane pressure gradient and thus increasing extracorporeal CO2 removal. Regional extracorporeal infusion of lactic acid before the artificial lung has proved to effectively increase the efficiency of an extracorporeal CO removal system in an experimental setting [12, 13]. This technique may allow the removal of more than 100 ml/minute of CO2 from an extracorporeal blood flow as low as 250 ml/minute [14]. Such a low blood flow may be achieved with vascular accesses and technology similar to the ones used for continuous renal replacement therapy in the intensive care unit. Lactic acid, however, is an energetic substrate and its metabolism, producing CO, may potentially reduce the clinical benefit of extracorporeal CO removal [1517]. The present study was designed to assess, in a swine model, the impact of lactic acid infusion on whole body CO production compared to an isocaloric glucose infusion.

Materials and methods

Experimental setting

Animal care and treatment were conducted in accordance with the Institutional Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (University of Milan) and in compliance with national laws and policies (D.L. n.116 G.U., suppl. 40, 18/02/1992; Circolare n.8, G.U., 14/07/1994), under the supervision of the veterinarian responsible for laboratory animal welfare. The protocol was approved by the University of Milan and MIUR (Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca).

Six female Large White pigs (weight 44.9 ± 5 kg) were initially sedated with an intramuscular injection of medetomidine (Domitor® PFIZER ITALIA Srl (DIV.VET.), Latina, Italy, 0.03 mg/kg) and tiletamine-zolazepam (Zoletil® VIRBAC Srl, Milan, Italy, 4 mg/kg); after catheterization of an ear vein, anesthesia was induced with propofol (Propofol Kabi® Fresenius Kabi Italia S.r.l. Isola della Scala, Verona, 2 to 2.5 mg/kg) to allow endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation (Servo 900C, Siemens-Elema AB, Sweden). Anesthesia was then maintained with continuous intravascular infusion of sodium thiopental (Pentothal Sodium® HOSPIRA SpA, Liscate (MI), Italy, 10 to 25 mg/kg/h), fentanyl (Fentanest® Pfizer Italia S.r.l., Latina, Italia, 50 to 200 mcg/h) and rocuronium (Esmeron® MSD Italia S.r.l., Roma, Italia, 30 to 100 mg/h). A Foley urinary catheter (8 to 10 Fr) was inserted and connected to a urine collection bag. Before surgery antibiotic prophylaxis with ceftriaxone (Fidato® Fidia Farmaceutici S.p.A., Abano Terme (PD), Italia, 2 g) and gentamycin (Gentamicina Pensa® Pensa Pharma S.p.A., Milano, Italia, 80 mg) was administered. The right femoral artery and left internal jugular vein were surgically cannulated for pressure monitoring, blood gas analysis and drug infusion. Following administration of an unfractioned heparin bolus (Epsoclar® Mayne Pharma Srl, Napoli, Italia, 200 U/kg), pigs were connected to a veno-venous extracorporeal circuit after surgical cannulation of the right external jugular vein with a 14-Fr catheter (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) for blood drainage and of the right femoral vein with a 10 to 12-Fr cannula for reinfusion. The extracorporeal circuit, required to infuse a concentrated (40%) lactic acid solution, consisted of a centrifugal pump (Jostra rotaflow, Maquet, Hechingen, Germany), a gas trap, a polysulphone membrane dialyzer (F8HPS, Fresenius, Bad-Homburg, Germany) and 1/4 to 3/16 inch inner-diameter tubing. No membrane lung was placed in the extracorporeal circuit. The outlet port of the dialyzer was connected to the inlet port to create a closed system with the dialysate flowing countercurrent to blood flow.

The experimental setup is outlined in Figure 1. The extracorporeal blood flow was set to 250 ml/minute and the dialysate flow at 300 ml/minute. A target activated clotting time (Hemocron Jr. Signature, ITC, Edison, NJ, USA) value of 250 to 300 sec was maintained by titrating a continuous infusion of unfractioned heparin.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Outline of the experimental setup. DF, dialyzer hemofilter. Circles represent the withdrawal sites.

During the experiment, the tidal volume was adjusted in order to maintain an arterial PCO2 of 50 mmHg, which is a physiologic value for both our animal model and the chronic hypercapnic patients and corresponds to a nearly neutral pH due to the high bicarbonate content of their blood. The inspiratory oxygen fraction was 40%; body temperature was controlled at 38°C through external physical methods. An intravenous infusion of a rapid-acting insulin analog was titrated to keep blood glucose levels constant (target = 100 mg/dl). At the end of the experiment all the pigs were sacrificed with a bolus injection of KCl (40 mEq) in the central venous line.

Study design

The experiment consisted of two steps, lasting four hours each, which differed only for the caloric source provided:
  • Glucose step: 97 kcal/h were administered, through the central venous catheter, as a 50% glucose solution (52 ml/h)

  • Lactic Acid step: 48.5 kcal/h were administered (34 ml/h) as a L-(+)-Lactic acid solution approximately 40% in H2O (Sigma-Aldrich Corp. St. Louis, MO, USA) into the gas trap of the recirculating dialysate [14], 48.5 kcal/h as 50% glucose solution (26 ml/h) were infused through the central venous catheter), for a total caloric load of 97 Kcal/h. The infused lactic acid amounted, therefore, to 2.5 mEq/minute.

These two steps, always performed in a preset sequence (Glucose followed by Lactic Acid) were repeated three times with a two-hour interval following the Lactic Acid step to allow a complete clearance of the infused lactate (Figure 2).
Figure 2
Figure 2

Schematic representation of the experiment timeline.

The total caloric intake during the whole study period was approximately 2,330 kcal/day, consistent with the estimated basal metabolic rate of anesthetized and curarized swine weighing approximately 45 kg [18].

Every hour (except during the two-hour interval after discontinuation of lactic acid infusion) we recorded: total CO2 production (VCO2), body temperature, arterial blood gases, blood glucose and arterial lactate level, hemodynamic parameters (heart rate, systemic arterial pressure, central venous pressure) and ventilatory parameters (tidal volume, respiratory rate, minute ventilation, airway pressures). All the blood gas analyses were performed with the ABL 800 FLEX (Radiometer, A. De Mori, Milano, Italy) which is equipped for the automatic determination of pH, blood gases, oxymetry, electrolytes, glucose and lactate. Fully automated quality controls are carried out; every four hours a manual calibration was performed. The ABL 800 measures the lactate concentration in the plasma. We calculated the ventilation of the dead space (VD) according to the standard equation: VD = VE * (PaCO2-PeCO2/PaCO2). PeCO2 = partial pressure of expired mixed CO2. Alveolar ventilation (VA) was calculated as follows: VA = VE - VD.

Total CO2 production (VCO2) was calculated as the product of expired CO2 concentration and minute ventilation (VE). The expired CO2 concentration was measured through an infrared CO2 analyzer (WMA-4, GMR Strumenti SAS, Florence, Italy) sampling at 400 ml/minute from a 20-liter mixing box connected to the exhaled gas exhaust port of the ventilator. VE was read from the ventilator, which was calibrated against a pneumotachograph (MLT300L, ADInstruments, Sydney, QLD, Australia), whose accuracy was regularly checked with a calibrated syringe.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the SigmaPlot 11.2 statistical software (Systat Software Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data are expressed as means ± standard deviations. To compare data of Glucose steps versus Lactic Acid steps a paired Student t-test was used. A paired-t analysis was performed to increase the statistical power, eliminating the confounding factor of the between-pig variation; actually a much larger sample would have been required to reject the null hypothesis without a paired analysis. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess normality of the samples. A two-way ANOVA was performed to assess whether the time factor had an impact on VCO2 during the different steps.

Results

A total of 16 two-step sequences (Glucose - Lactic Acid), were conducted on six animals. No complications related to lactic acid infusion were reported. In two pigs the study was interrupted before the third two-step sequence, in one case due to abrupt clotting of an extracorporeal cannula and in the other case due to severe hemodynamic instability.

The average total CO2 production was 269 ± 22 and 282 ± 19 ml/minute, respectively, during Glucose and Lactic Acid infusion (P <0.05). The increase in VCO2 during the Lactic Acid step was 4.8%. This difference in VCO2, though quantitatively small, was, however, statistically significant at the first, third and fourth hours of each step (see Figure 3), but not at the 2nd. The time factor did not affect VCO2 (P = 1.00), which remained stable over time during both the Glucose and Lactic Acid steps.
Figure 3
Figure 3

VCO 2 during Glucose and Lactic Acid steps over time. *: P <0.05 versus the glucose step at the same time.

Arterial lactate was higher (2.6 ± 0.6 vs. 0.4 ± 0.2 mmol/l, P <0.05), arterial pH was lower (7.422 ± 0.03 vs. 7.445 ± 0.02, P <0.05) and HCO3- was lower (32.2 ± 2.3 vs. 33.9 ± 1.7 mmol/L, P <0.05) during the Lactic Acid steps. Arterial PCO2 (50.1 ± 1.4 vs. 50.3 ± 1.5 mmHg, P = 0.54) and arterial glucose (107 ± 15 and 104 ± 13 mg/dl, P = 0.25) were kept constant; as was the amount of insulin needed to maintain target blood glucose (1.2 ± 0.8 and 1.3 ± 1 U/h during Lactic Acid and Glucose, respectively, P = 0.61). Arterial PO2 was 175 ± 30 mmHg during Lactic Acid and 167 ± 34 during Glucose (P = 0.22).

Minute ventilation (8.7 ± 1.2 vs. 8.3 ± 1.2 L/minute, P <0.05) and alveolar ventilation (4 ± 0.3 vs. 3.8 ± 0.3 L/minute, P <0.05) were slightly (barely 5%) but significantly higher during Lactic Acid steps.

Body temperature was not different during Lactic Acid (38.0 ± 0.1°C) or Glucose (38.1 ± 0.1°C), P = 0.06. At all sample times all hemodynamic and respiratory parameters were comparable in both groups, except for a small increase in tidal volume which was required to compensate for the VCO2 rise (see Table 1).
Table 1

Main hemodynamic and respiratory parameters

 

Glucose

Lactic acid

P

Heart rate, bpm

91 ± 15

87 ± 18

P = 0.19

MAP, mmHg

74 ± 14

71 ± 12

P = 0.12

CVP, mmHg

10 ± 3

10 ± 4

P = 0.32

TV, ml

489 ± 52

513 ± 50

P <0.05

RR, breaths per minute

17.2 ± 1.2

17.2 ± 1.2

P = 0.32

bpm, beats per minute; CVP, Central Venous Pressure; MAP, Mean Arterial Pressure; RR, Respiratory Rate; TV, Tidal Volume. Mean ± standard deviation of data collected at first, second and fourth hour of each step.

Discussion

In the present study, we evaluated the VCO2 changes in anesthetized pigs associated with lactic acid infusion. While maintaining a constant caloric intake, replacement of 50% of the caloric input with lactic acid, corresponding to an infusion of 2.5 m Eq/minute, caused an increase in total CO2 production of less than 5% (13 ml/minute).

This clinically small but statistically significant difference in total CO2 production may be due to several causes. First, a small increase in total VCO2 during lactic acid infusion is expected since the complete oxidation of lactate load produces 3.6% more CO2 than an amount of glucose of equal caloric content. Therefore, since in the present study lactic acid infusion provided 50% of the total caloric intake, a VCO2 increase of about 1.8% was expected. A variable proportion of the infused lactic acid may enter gluconeogenesis, and then possibly be stored as glycogen. The net result of this process will also cause a net increase in VCO2.

Another factor contributing to the VCO2 increase may result from the conversion of bicarbonate ions into CO2, caused by the increased systemic steady state levels of lactate and the resulting very mild metabolic acidosis. Indeed, although lactate levels remained lower than 3 mEq/l, a small reduction in arterial pH (of 0.023 pH units) was recorded. Such a systemic pH drop, promoting the «shift» of bicarbonate towards dissolved CO2, may have caused a transient increase in VCO2, despite a stable metabolic CO2 production. Failure to reach a steady state condition during lactic acid infusion might have contributed to the slight increase in VCO2. Overall, during lactic acid infusion, in order to maintain a constant arterial PCO2, a small increase in alveolar ventilation (5%) was required.

The infusion of lactic acid at the inlet of a membrane lung, by shifting the equilibrium towards the dissolved form of carbon dioxide, determines a significant increase of extracorporeal CO2 removal [12]. We have previously shown, in a similar animal model [14], that an infusion of 2.5 mEq/minute of lactic acid (the same rate as tested in the present study) at the inlet of a pediatric artificial lung (extracorporeal blood flow 0.25 L/minute), could increase extracorporeal CO2 removal by approximately 40 to 45 ml/minute (60 ± 9 vs. 101 ± 16 ml/minute, without and with lactic acid infusion, respectively), while the PaCO2 was maintained constant at 50 mmHg as in the current study. In that experiment we did not maintain a constant caloric intake, (caloric input increased from 43 to 90 Kcal/h when lactic acid was infused), hence, the total VCO2 was not evaluated.

In the current study, at variance, we kept the caloric input constant and we observed that lactic acid infusion slightly increases the total CO2 production (13 ml/minute with our experimental setting). We may, therefore, speculate that regional extracorporeal blood acidification at the inlet of the membrane lung may allow a substantial decrease in the patient’s ventilatory needs; actually, despite increasing the total CO2 production (13 ml/minute increase), it produces a significantly higher increase in extracorporeal CO2 removal (40 to 45 ml/minute increase). This assumption may be true only if, during lactic acid infusion, the total caloric intake is maintained constant.

The caloric input (around 2,330 kcal/day) applied in the present study, was based on literature and preliminary data [14, 18]. The infusion of 2.5 mEq/minute of lactic acid (approximately 1,150 Kcal/day), representing around 50% of the daily energy requirement of our model, would provide a conspicuous fraction of the daily caloric needs of an ICU patient and, therefore, it should always be included in the energy balance.

The actual impact of lactic acid infusion, as part of an extracorporeal CO2 removal technique, on the nutritional balance is still to be determined. Lactate enters the glucose metabolism pathway after conversion to pyruvate; if a patient’s total caloric input is kept constant, we can assume that this pyruvate may follow the same metabolic pathway as the pyruvate produced from glucose metabolism. Furthermore, the insulin infusion rate required during the Glucose and Lactic acid steps to maintain a constant blood glucose concentration was similar and very low; hence, it is unlikely that insulin infusion may have altered the balance between glucose storage and glucose oxidation.

The choice of lactic acid to achieve blood acidification has several advantages: it is not toxic [17], it has a very fast metabolism and point-of-care testing of lactate is available in most ICUs. In our previous study we also demonstrated that a 48-hour lactic acid infusion, performed through an extracorporeal dialysis circuit, is safe and does not lead to any injury of red blood cells and major organs [14]. Blood acidification may be achieved by infusion of other metabolizable acids, such as citric or acetic acid; however, their anions are difficult to measure in the clinical setting. Moreover, their clearance is less predictable than that of lactate, at least for citric acid [19]. Furthermore, oxidation of equal caloric amounts of these acids produces more CO2 than lactic acid (see Table 2).
Table 2

CO 2 production from total oxidation of different substrates to produce 1 Kcal

Substrate

Kcal

Mmol of substrate

CO2production (mmol)

CO2production (ml)

Glucose

1

1.48

8.9

199

Lactate

1

3.08

9.25

207

Acetate

1

4.93

9.85

220

Citrate

1

2.12

12.73

285

An alternative choice may be the utilization of non-metabolizable acids (for example, hydrochloric acid), which do not provide calories; however, their usage requires an extracorporeal removal of the infused anions which may significantly increase the complexity of the extracorporeal system [20, 21].

Some limitations of the present study deserve to be discussed. First, our animal model may present some differences from humans: in a growing pig, even if anesthetized and paralyzed, the basal energy requirement and VCO2 per unit weight are far greater than those of an adult man [22]. Moreover, we cannot exclude the fact that different results would have derived from a critically ill animal model. Second, in our model, the arterial pH and bicarbonate ion concentrations are elevated, and may not closely represent the critical patients, even though the bicarbonate levels may be comparable to the one of chronic hypercapnic patients. Third, we did not investigate the metabolic pathway of infused lactate, which would have required the application of specific techniques (for example, use of isotopic carbon-labeled glucose or lactate) that are beyond the scope of the present investigation.

Conclusions

Administration of 50% of the total caloric input with an infusion of lactic acid (2.5 mEq/minute) only marginally increased (less than 5%) the total CO2 production compared to an equal caloric load provided entirely by infusion of a 50% glucose solution. Since an equal rate of acidification, as shown in a previous study, increased the membrane lung removal by at least 50 ml/minute, we may speculate that blood acidification at the inlet of a membrane lung could be a promising technique to reduce the ventilatory needs.

Key messages

  •  Infusion of lactic acid slightly increases the total CO2 production compared to an isocaloric infusion of glucose.

  •  An extracorporeal CO2 removal technique based on blood acidification with lactic acid infusion could be a promising technique to reduce the ventilatory needs, if the total caloric intake is kept constant.

Abbreviations

ECCO2R: 

Extracorporeal CO2 removal

VA: 

Alveolar ventilation

VCO2: 

CO2 production

VD: 

Ventilation of the dead space

VE: 

Minute ventilation

VILI: 

Ventilation-Induced Lung Injury.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Special thanks go to Dr. G. Castagna, Dr. S. Abd El Aziz El Sayed Deab, Dr. D. Ferlicca, Dr. E. Rezoagli, Dr. S. Arrigoni, and Dr. S. Sosio for his help with the management of the experiments. We also thank Dr. G. Grasselli for his time spent in reviewing our manuscript.

The study was funded by Regione Lombardia (Bando Accordo Quadro Con il Sistema Universitario 1 Luglio 2009) and by Università Degli Studi Milano-Bicocca (Departemental Funds).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medical Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Ospedale San Gerardo Nuovo dei Tintori, via Donizetti 106, 20900 Milan, Monza, Italy
(2)
Dipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie e Sanità Pubblica, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria, 10, 20133 Milan, Italy

References

  1. Pesenti A, Pelizzola A, Mascheroni D, Uziel L, Pirovano E, Fox U, Gattinoni L, Kolobow T: Low frequency positive pressure ventilation with extracorporeal CO2 removal (LEPPV-ECCO2R) in acute respiratory failure (ARF): technique. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1981, 27: 263-266.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Gattinoni L, Kolobow T, Agostoni A, Damia G, Pelizzola A, Rossi GP, Langer M, Solca M, Citterio R, Pesenti A, Fox U, Uziel L: Clinical application of low frequency positive pressure ventilation with extracorporeal CO2 removal (LFPPV-ECCO2R) in treatment of adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Int J Artif Organs 1979, 2: 282-283.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kolobow T, Gattinoni L, Tomlinson TA, Pierce JE: Control of breathing using an extracorporeal membrane lung. Anesthesiology 1977, 46: 138-141. 10.1097/00000542-197702000-00012View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Marcolin R, Mascheroni D, Pesenti A, Bombino M, Gattinoni L: Ventilatory impact of partial extracorporeal CO2 removal (PECOR) in ARF patients. ASAIO Trans 1986, 32: 508-510. 10.1097/00002480-198609000-00025View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Pesenti A, Rossi GP, Pelosi P, Brazzi L, Gattinoni L: Percutaneous extracorporeal CO2 removal in a patient with bullous emphysema with recurrent bilateral pneumothoraces and respiratory failure. Anesthesiology 1990, 72: 571-573. 10.1097/00000542-199003000-00031View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Terragni PP, Del Sorbo L, Mascia L, Urbino R, Martin EL, Birocco A, Faggiano C, Quintel M, Gattinoni L, Ranieri VM: Tidal volume lower than 6 ml/kg enhances lung protection: role of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal. Anesthesiology 2009, 111: 826-835. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181b764d2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fuehner T, Kuehn C, Hadem J, Wiesner O, Gottlieb J, Tudorache I, Olsson KM, Greer M, Sommer W, Welte T, Haverich A, Hoeper MM, Warnecke G: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in awake patients as bridge to lung transplantation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012, 185: 763-768. 10.1164/rccm.201109-1599OCView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kluge S, Braune SA, Engel M, Nierhaus A, Frings D, Ebelt H, Uhrig A, Metschke M, Wegscheider K, Suttorp N, Rousseau S: Avoiding invasive mechanical ventilation by extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal in patients failing noninvasive ventilation. Intensive Care Med 2012, 38: 1632. 10.1007/s00134-012-2649-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Javidfar J, Brodie D, Iribarne A, Jurado J, Lavelle M, Brenner K, Arcasoy S, Sonett J, Bacchetta M: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to lung transplantation and recovery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012, 144: 716-721. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.05.040View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Batchinsky AI, Jordan BS, Regn D, Necsoiu C, Federspiel WJ, Morris MJ, Cancio LC: Respiratory dialysis: reduction in dependence on mechanical ventilation by venovenous extracorporeal CO2 removal. Crit Care Med 2011, 39: 1382-1387. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31820eda45View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Crotti S, Lissoni A, Tubiolo D, Azzari S, Tarsia P, Caspani L, Gattinoni L: Artificial lung as an alternative to mechanical ventilation in COPD exacerbation. Eur Respir J 2012, 39: 212-215. 10.1183/09031936.00021111View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Zanella A, Patroniti N, Isgro S, Albertini M, Costanzi M, Pirrone F, Scaravilli V, Vergnano B, Pesenti A: Blood acidification enhances carbon dioxide removal of membrane lung: an experimental study. Intensive Care Med 2009, 35: 1484-1487. 10.1007/s00134-009-1513-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Snider MT, Chaudhari SN, Richard RB, Whitcomb DR, Russell GB: Augmentation of CO2 transfer in membrane lungs by the infusion of a metabolizable organic acid. ASAIO Trans 1987, 33: 345-351.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Zanella A, Mangili P, Redaelli S, Ferlicca D, Patroniti N, Pesenti A: Blood acidification enhances extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal: long term animal study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012, 185: A6020.Google Scholar
  15. Gladden LB: A lactatic perspective on metabolism. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008, 40: 477-485. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31815fa580View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gladden LB: Lactate metabolism: a new paradigm for the third millennium. J Physiol 2004, 558: 5-30. 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.058701PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Leverve XM: Lactate in the intensive care unit: pyromaniac, sentinel or fireman? Crit Care 2005, 9: 622-623. 10.1186/cc3935PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Noblet J, Shi XS, Dubois S: Effect of body weight on net energy value of feeds for growing pigs. J Anim Sci 1994, 72: 648-657.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Revelly JP, Tappy L, Martinez A, Bollmann M, Cayeux MC, Berger MM, Chiolero RL: Lactate and glucose metabolism in severe sepsis and cardiogenic shock. Crit Care Med 2005, 33: 2235-2240. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000181525.99295.8FView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Nolte SH, Benfer RH, Grau J: Extracorporeal CO2 removal with hemodialysis (ECBicCO2R): how to make up for the bicarbonate loss? Int J Artif Organs 1991, 14: 759-764.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Chang BS, Garella S: Complete extracorporeal removal of metabolic carbon dioxide by alkali administration and dialysis in apnea. Int J Artif Organs 1983, 6: 295-298.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Pestana D, Garcia-de-Lorenzo A, Madero R: Metabolic pattern and lipid oxidation during abdominal surgery: midazolam versus propofol. Anesth Analg 1996, 83: 837-843.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement