Skip to main content

Table 3 Quality assessment of observational studies

From: Safety and efficacy of noninvasive ventilation in patients with blunt chest trauma: a systematic review

 

Selection

Comparability

Outcome/exposure

 

Study

Representation of the exposed cohort

Selection of non exposed cohort

Ascertainment of exposure

Outcome not present at start

Comparability of cohorts based on design or analysis

Assessment of outcomes

Time for follow-up

Adequacy of follow-up

Overall score

Linton et al. (1982)

*

*

*

*

-

*

-

-

Moderate

Vidhani et al. (2001)

*

-

*

*

*

_

_

-

Low

  1. aAsterisks in each category signify identification of an appropriate methodological process in the study. Studies were considered to be of high quality if less than two components of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were missing, fair quality if two or three components were missing and low quality if more than three components were missing.