Skip to main content

Table 2 Nutritional outcomes reported

From: Comparisons between intragastric and small intestinal delivery of enteral nutrition in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Days of artificial nutrition

Determination of energy requirements

Reported nutritional intake such that data could be incorporated into meta-analysis?

1. Montecalvo 1992

Gastric 10.3 ± 10.0 d and Small intestine 10.4 ± 7.4 d

Inadequately described

Yes

2. Kortbeek 1999

Not reported

Harris-Benedict

No, did not report calories received but time to tolerate feeds for 24 consecutive hours

3. Taylor 1999

Control 11 days vs. Intervention 9 days (median).

Schofield

No, but intervention patients had a higher mean percentage of energy

4. Kearns 2000

Gastric 8 ± 1 days and Small intestine 9 ± 1 mean ± SEM

Calculated energy expenditure; calculation not specified

Yes

5. Minard 2000

Not reported

Weight-based

No, as day of commencing nutrition different

6. Esparaza 2001

Gastric 4.1 d

Small intestine 3.6 d; (mean)

Harris Benedict

No, spread of data not reported

7. Boivin 2001

Not reported

Weight-based

No, data only in graphs and not described in text

8. Day 2001

Not reported

Harris-Benedict

Not included as data presented as percentage target per day. However, increased nutrient delivery was observed with gastric feeding on days 2 and 3 but not afterward.

9. Davies 2002

Gastric 8.2 d

Small intestine 8.6 d; mean

Harris Benedict

No, data for calories delivered in first 48 hours, but not thereafter.

10. Neumann 2002

Gastric 6.5 ± 4.4 d

Small intestine 5.3 ± 4.5 d

Mean ± SD

Not described

No, but time to reach goal reported

11. Montejo 2002

Gastric 12 ± 10 d

Small intestine 11 ± 8 d

Mean ± SD

Not standardised but determined by each site investigator

Yes

12. Hsu 2009

Not reported

Ireton-Jones equation

Yes

13. White 2009

Gastric 3.92 (1.05 to 7.88) vs. small bowel 3.63 (1.89 to 6.92) days; median (IQR)

Weight based

No, reported as energy deficit with energy deficit less with gastric feeding

14. Acosta-Escribano 2010

Not reported

weight-based

Yes

15. Davies 2012

EN for a median of 8 (interquartile range 5 to 14) days.

Schofield

Yes