Table 5 Pooled predictive performance of absolute percentage changes in arterial load parameters on all PPCO algorithms to detect an absolute PPCO-EDCO discrepancy of at least 10%
From: Impact of arterial load on the agreement between pulse pressure analysis and esophageal Doppler
| Â | Pooled AUC (95% CI) | Pooled sensitivity (95% CI) | Pooled specificity (95% CI) | Pooled optimal cutoff | Pooled Youden index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ΔMAP | 0.77 (0.75-0.77) | 65.2% (63.9%-66.4%) | 76.8% (76.0%-77.6%) | 7.4% ± 1.1% | 0.42 ± 0.06 |
ΔTSVR | 0.79 (0.78-0.79) | 63.1% (61.9%-64.1%) | 82.1% (81.3%-82.8%) | 10.6% ± 1.3% | 0.45 ± 0.14 |
ΔC | 0.83 (0.83-0.84) | 72.6% (71.4%-73.7%) | 82.5% (81.8%-83.2%) | 10.3% ± 0.9% | 0.55 ± 0.12 |
ΔEa | 0.86 (0.85-0.86) | 75.1% (73.9%-76.2%) | 83.3% (82.6%-83.9%) | 8.9% ± 0.6% | 0.58 ± 0.14 |