From: Bench-to-bedside review: Future novel diagnostics for sepsis - a systems biology approach
Omics | Strengths | Limitations | Clinical utility |
---|---|---|---|
Genomics | Â | Â | Â |
SNP | • Unbiased approach when using GWAS | • Difficult to find functional and structural gene variants | • Theragnostic approach |
 | • Cost-effective large-scale genetic screening | • Only regulatory or coding regions are included | • Risk stratification |
 | • Well-established analysis tools | • Tissue-specific alterations |  |
Epigenetics | • Unbiased approach when using epigenome-wide association studies | • Different composition of cell types during sepsis | • Epigenetic signatures for sepsis diagnosis and/or prognosis |
 | • Can elucidate the interplay between genetic and environmental factors | • Frequency of epigenetic changes not known | • Prediction of therapeutic response |
 |  | • Reverse causation |  |
Transcriptomics | Â | Â | Â |
Expression profiling | • Can generate global view transcriptome alterations | • Tissue-specific expression of genes | • mRNA expression signatures for sepsis diagnosis and/or prognosis |
 | • Provide good coverage of genome | • Fails to measure low-expression genes with good sensitivity | • Prediction of therapeutic response |
 | • Can elucidate alterations in signal transduction pathways during sepsis |  |  |
High-throughput gene sequencing (for example, RNA-seq) | • Comprehensive sequence information | • Tissue-specific expression of genes | • No clinical utility |
 | • Unbiased approach |  |  |
 | • Estimates abundance of genes in term of copies |  |  |
miRNA | • Stable in blood | • Functions not completely understood | • Novel diagnostic and/or prognostic biomarkers in sepsis. |
 | • Suggestive evidence that miRNAs play an important role in regulation of networks |  | • Necessary for correctly interpretation of gene expression |
 | • The inclusion of miRNA when interpreting mRNA expression |  |  |
Proteomics | • Provides global or unbiased alteration | • Needs large amount of preprocessing or fractions | • Novel diagnostic and/or prognostic biomarkers in sepsis |
 | • Highly sensitive | • Current instruments unable to measure all proteins from complex biological fluids | • Prediction of therapeutic response |
 | • No need for antibody-based technologies for measuring proteins | • Inefficient quantification of low expression proteins |  |
Metabolomics | • Relatively few targets | • Difficulty in identifying small molecules | • Novel diagnostic and/or prognostic biomarkers in sepsis |
 | • Good translation to existing laboratory technology | • Diverse physical and chemical properties and thus no single extraction tool | • Prediction of therapeutic response |
 |  |  | • Disease progression |