Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of qualities between small and large trials in meta-analyses in critical care medicine.

From: Small studies may overestimate the effect sizes in critical care meta-analyses: a meta-epidemiological study

 

No. of patients in component trials

P value

 

Large trials (>100 per arm, n = 73)

Small trials (<100 per arm, n = 244)

 

Sequence generating

  

0.031

   Adequate

29 (59%)

50 (41%)

 

   Inadequate/unclear

20 (41%)

72 (59%)

 

Allocation concealment

  

<0.001

   Adequate

56 (82%)

114 (51%)

 

   Inadequate/unclear

12 (18%)

111 (49%)

 

Blinding

  

<0.001

   Adequate

49 (67%)

99 (41%)

 

   Inadequate/unclear

24 (33%)

145 (59%)

 

Incomplete follow-up data addressed

  

<0.001

   Adequate

36 (86%)

56 (48%)

 

   Inadequate/unclear

6 (14%)

61 (52%)

 

Intention to treat

  

<0.001

   Yes

38 (83%)

79 (52%)

 

   No/unclear

8 (17%)

72 (48%)

 

Sample size calculation

  

<0.001

   Yes

29 (88%)

32 (44%)

 

   No/unclear

4 (12%)

40 (56%)

 

Year of publication

  

<0.001

   Before 2002

55 (75%)

127 (52%)

 

   After 2002

18 (25%)

117 (48%)

Â