Skip to main content

Table 2 Studies comparing manual hyperinflation (MH) with other strategies

From: Benefits and risks of manual hyperinflation in intubated and mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: a systematic review

Author [ref]

Year

Subjects

N

Study design

Intervention

Reported aspects of the MH maneuver

Main results

Berney et al. [29]

2002

Unselected intensive care unit patients

20

Randomized crossover trial

MH vs. hyperinflation by the mechanical ventilator

Volume: ±

Inspiration speed: +

Pause: +

Expiration speed: ±

Both techniques improved pulmonary compliance equally; no affects on clearance of airway secretions

Paratz et al. [33]

2002

Patients with acute lung injury

16

Prospective observational study

MH

Volume: +

Inspiration speed: +

Pause: +

Expiration speed: +

MH increased pulmonary compliance; P/F increased in patients with an extrapulmonary cause of acute lung injury, whereas it decreased in patients with a pulmonary cause of acute lung injury

Savian et al. [30]

2006

Unselected intensive care unit patients

14

Randomized crossover trial

MH vs. hyperinflation by the mechanical ventilator

Volume: -

Inspiration speed: +

Pause: +

Expiration speed: +

MH affected neither pulmonary compliance and PaO2, nor clearance of airway secretions

Hodgson et al. [31]

2007

Unselected intensive care unit patients

20

Randomized crossover trial

MH with two different devices for hyperinflation

Volume: ±

Inspiration speed: -

Pause: +

Expiration speed: ±

MH affect neither pulmonary compliance nor P/F; clearance of airway secretions differed between two devices

Ahmed et al. [28]

2010

Postcardiac surgery patients

30

Randomized controlled trial

MH vs. hyperinflation by the mechanical ventilator

Volume: ±

Inspiration speed: +

Pause: +

Expiration speed: +

Both techniques improved P/F equally; both techniques did not affect pulmonary compliance

Dennis et al. [27]

2012

Patients with atelectasis

46

Randomized cross-over trial

MH vs. hyperinflation by the mechanical ventilator

Volume: ±

Inspiration speed: -

Pause: +

Expiration speed: -

Clearance of airway secretions did not differ between the two techniques; both techniques did not affect pulmonary compliance; P/F increased after VH but it decreased after MH

  1. Reported aspects of the MH maneuver: volume, whether larger than normal breaths were used; inspiration speed, whether a low inspiratory flow was used; pause, whether pauses were used; expiration speed, whether rapid expiratory flows were used (+, mentioned; -, not mentioned; ±, uncertain).