Study | n | Study design | Study population | Probiotic regimen | Primary endpoint | Additional findings | Limitations |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VAP/respiratory tract infection as primary outcome | |||||||
Forestier and colleagues [49] | 208 | DB, SC, RCT | Mixed ICU, >18 years old, requiring MV >48 hours | Lactobacillus casei rhamnosus, 109 CFU vs. placebo ng/og twice daily until ICU discharge or death | Time to first colonisation/infection of the gastric and respiratory tracts with Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Median delay 50 days probiotic vs. 11 days placebo (P = 0.01) | P. aeruginosa VAP reduced in probiotic group: 2.9% vs. 7.5% (P = NS). No adverse effects | Single centre. More patients in probiotic group than placebo received antipseudomonal antibiotics during their admission (55% vs. 43%) |
Knight and colleagues [51] | 259 | DB, SC, RCT | Mixed ICU, >16 years old, requiring MV >2 days | Synbiotic 2000 Forte: 1010 CFU vs. placebo ng/og twice daily until day 28, ICU discharge or death | Incidence of VAP: 9% probiotic vs. 13% placebo (P = 0.42) | Hospital mortality: 27% vs. 33% (P = 0.39). No adverse effects | Single centre. Overall VAP rate lower than anticipated |
Morrow and colleagues [38] | 146 | DB, SC, RCT | Mixed ICU, >18 years old, expected to require MV >72 hours | Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG 109 CFU vs. placebo per orally and ng twice daily, started within 24 hours until death, extubation or tracheostomy | Incidence of VAP: 19.1% probiotic vs. 40% placebo (P = 0.007) | Significant reduction in Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea and ICU-associated diarrhoea, fewer antibiotic days, delay in onset of VAP, reduction in gastric and oral colonisation with pathogenic species, preferential reduction in VAP caused by Gram-negative pathogens. No adverse effects | Single centre. Small sample size. High-risk population, selected: mean APACHE II score 23, mean days ventilated 10 days. Extensive exclusions: pregnancy; immunosuppression; prosthetic heart valve or vascular graft; cardiac trauma; history of rheumatic fever, endocarditis or congenital heart defect; gastro-oesophageal or intestinal injury or foregut surgery; oropharyngeal injury; tracheostomy |
VAP/respiratory tract infection as secondary outcome | |||||||
Kotzampassi and colleagues [47] | 65 | DB, two centre, RCT | Severe multiple trauma patients, >18 years old, requiring MV | Synbiotic 2000 Forte: 1011 CFU vs. placebo once daily via gastrostomy or ng for 15 days | Systemic infection rate during ICU stay or the development of SIRS and MODS. Overall infection rate: 63% probiotic vs. 90% placebo (P = 0.01) | VAP rate reduced in probiotic group: 54% vs. 80% in placebo group (P = 0.03). Central line and urinary tract infections also significantly reduced. Severe sepsis: 17% vs. 40% (P = 0.04). Ventilation days (P = 0.001) and ICU length of stay (P = 0.01) significantly reduced with probiotics. Reduction in mortality (14.3% vs. 30%) nonsignificant (P = 0.12). No adverse effects | Small sample size, severe trauma patients only |
Spindler-Vessel and colleagues [48] | 132 | SC, RCT | Severe multipletrauma patients requiring MV, at least 4-day ICU stay | Synbiotic 2000 Forte, 1010 CFU vs. glutamine or fermentable fibre or peptide diet once daily ng/og for 15 days or until ICU discharge or death | Effect on intestinal permeability reduced on day 7 in probiotic group only (P <0.05) | Probiotic group also had fewer pneumonias (P = 0.03) and total infections (P = 0.003). No adverse effects | Single centre. Small sample size, comparing multiple interventions, no placebo group |
Klarin and colleagues [50] | 50 | Open label, SC, RCT | Mixed ICU, 18 years old, requiring MV >24 hours | Lactobacillus plantarum 299, 1010 CFU vs. 0.1% chlorhexidine per orally twice daily until ICU discharge or death | Pathogenic bacterial load in oropharynx. New colonisation rate: 34.8% probiotic vs. 61.9% chlorhexidine (P = 0.13) | Emerging bacteria largely Gram-negative species. Noncolonised patients had lower ventilator days (P <0.001). Incidence of VAP: 4% probiotic group vs. 14% chlorhexidine group (P = NS). No adverse effects | Single centre. Not powered for incidence of VAP as primary outcome. Small sample size |
Barraud and colleagues [53] | 167 | DB, SC, RCT | Medical ICU, >18 years old, MV > 48 hours | Ergyphilus 2×1010 lactic acid bacteria, mostly L. rhamnosus GG, once a day vs. placebo via enteral feeding tube. | 28-day mortality. No difference: 25.3% probiotic vs. 23.7% placebo (P = 0.8) | Mortality rates in ICU and at 90 days were also unaffected by the treatment. Incidence of ICU-acquired infections including VAP not significantly different except for catheter-related bloodstream infections that were lowered by probiotics. Reduced 28-day mortality in severe sepsis patients given probiotics (P = 0.035) but higher mortality rate in nonsevere sepsis patients (P = 0.08) | Single centre. Small sample. Stopped early |
Oudhuis and colleagues [52] | 254 | Two centre, open label, cross over | Mixed ICUs, consecutive ICU patients with expected MV ≥48 hours and/or expected ICU stay ≥72 hours | L. plantarum 299/299v in a dose of 5×109 CFU together with 6 g of rose-hip, twice daily via ng vs. SDD | ICU-acquired infection rate: 31% probiotic vs. 24% SDD (P = 0.10) | No significant difference in VAP rate (7.7% vs. 7.2%.), 28-day or ICU mortality between groups | Small sample size. Stopped early. Crossover of units was not completed, resulting in unequal mix of patients and disease burden. Not DB. Infections defined retrospectively |