Skip to main content

Table 5 Clustering measures

From: Temperature variability analysis using wavelets and multiscale entropy in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis, and septic shock

 

Cluster points

Intraclass distance

Interclass distance

    
 

n1

n2

c1

c2

d12

d21

Clustering cost

Sensitivity

Specificity

Accuracy

DWT high ultradian entropy (WEn5-6)

15

7

8.73

6.73

3.85

3.86

1.673

82.35%

80%

81.81%

CWT entropy neuro meta

5

17

6.15

6.79

4.25

4.24

1.749

60%

88.23%

81.81%

CWT

entropies

8

14

10.61

4.11

3.61

2.79

1.777

100%

82.35%

86.36%

CWT entro ultradian

14

8

3.95

10.76

2.68

3.57

1.788

82.35%

100%

86.36%

SampEn and sumEn

17

5

8.43

6.34

3.28

3.83

1.905

76.47%

20%

63.63%

CWT entro all and neurogenic

5

17

6.78

8.73

4.21

4.09

1.990

60%

88.23%

81.81%

DWT low ultradian entropy (WEn7-8)

15

7

13.49

9.46

3.17

3.44

2.402

76.47%

60%

72.72%

DWT Neurogenic and metabolic entropy (WEn1-2-3)

6

16

9.63

11.71

5.83

6.36

2.420

60%

82.35%

77.27%

T Mean & Std

9

13

11.63

12.78

2.35

2.13

2.499

40%

58.82%

54.54%

CWT energy

4

18

14.48

11.92

8.17

6.35

4.353

0

76.47%

59.09%

  1. The table shows, for sign_mdetr signal, clusters formed for different feature sets, number of data per cluster (n1 and n2), along with the intraclass euclidean distance for each cluster (c1 and c2), the mean interclass distance to center of the class (d12 and d21), the cost, calculated as the sum of intraclass and inverse interclass distances, and the correspondence of clustering with the a posteriori knowledge of groups (as accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, with sensitivity referring to SIRS). The schemes are sorted in terms of cost. Schemes resulting in clustering with fewer than three members are omitted. DWT, discrete wavelet transformation; CWT, continuous wavelet transformation; SampEn, sample entropy; sumEn, multiscale entropy; SampEn, sample entropy; T, temperature; Std, standard deviation.