Skip to main content

Table 2 Study description and quality assessment

From: Economic analyses of venous thromboembolism prevention strategies in hospitalized patients: a systematic review

Article

Interventions compared

Patient group

Were the outcomes accurately measured?

Were the costs accurately measured?

Was uncertainty in analysis determined?

Were estimates and costs related to the baseline risk in treatment population?

Pechevis, 2000

Enoxaparin 40 mg daily versus placebo for 6-14 days

Medical

Yes; outcomes taken from RCTs

Yes; data from literature

Yes

Yes

Lloyd, 2001

UFH 5,000 units twice daily versus enoxaparin 40 mg daily for 6-14 days

Medical

Yes; outcomes taken from RCTs

Yes; data from literature

Yes

Yes

Lamy, 2002

Enoxaparin 20 mg versus 40 mg versus placebo for 6-14 days

Medical

Yes; outcomes taken from RCTs

Yes; data from hospital, OHIP

Yes

Yes

Offord, 2003

Enoxaparin 40 mg daily versus UFH 5,000 units twice daily versus none for 6-14 days

Medical

Yes; outcomes taken from RCT/meta-analysis

Yes; data from a hospital

Yes

Yes

Schadlich, 2006

Enoxaparin 40 mg versus UFH 5,000 units three times daily for 6-14 days

Medical

Yes; outcomes taken from RCTs/meta-analysis

Yes; data from the German Health System

Yes

Yes

Drummond, 1994

UFH 5,000 units 3 times daily versus enoxaparin 40 mg daily for 7 days

HFS

Yes; outcomes taken from RCTs

Yes; data from literature

Yes

Yes

Hawkins, 1997

Enoxaparin 30 mg daily versus UFH 5,000 units for 7 days

THR

Yes; outcomes taken from RCTs

Yes; data from literature

Yes

Yes

Marchetti, 1999

UFH 5,000 units twice daily versus LMWH enoxaparin 40 mg daily for 14 days

THR

Yes; outcomes taken from RCTs/meta-analysis

Yes; data from literature

Yes

Yes

McGarry, 2004

UFH 5,000 units twice daily versus enoxaparin 40 mg daily versus nothing for 30 days

Medical

Yes; outcomes taken from RCTs/meta-analysis

Yes; data from literature

Yes

Yes

Deitelzweig, 2008

UFH 5,000 units twice daily versus enoxaparin 40 mg daily versus nothing for 5 days

Medical

Yes; outcomes taken from RCTs

Yes; data from literature

Yes

Yes

Wade, 2008

UFH 5,000 units 3 times daily versus dalteparin 5,000 units daily for 10 days

Gynecology oncology surgery

Yes; outcomes taken from RCTs

Yes; data from literature

Yes

Yes

Lloyd, 1997

UFH 5,000 units twice daily/3 times daily versus nadroparin for 10-14 days

Orthopedic and general surgery

Yes; outcomes taken from meta-analysis

Yes; data from published rates of pay, costs from a hospital

Yes

Yes

Heerey, 2005

Dalteparin 2,500 units versus 5,000 units versus UFH for 10 days

Abdominal surgery

Yes; outcomes taken from RCTs

Yes; data from Medicare reimbursement

Yes

Yes

O'Brien, 1994

Enoxaparin 30 mg twice daily versus warfarin for 7 days

THR

Yes; outcomes taken from RCTs

Yes; data from literature

Yes

Yes

Menzin, 1995

Enoxaparin 30 mg twice daily versus warfarin (INR 2-3) versus nothing for 5-14 days

THR

Yes; outcomes taken from RCTs

Yes; data from literature

Yes

Yes

Hull, 1997

Warfarin versus tinzaparin 175 units/kg for 14 days

THR, TKR

Yes; outcomes taken from RCTs

Yes; data from literature

Yes

Yes

Hawkins, 1998

Enoxaparin 30 mg twice daily versus warfarin for 10 days

TKR

Yes; outcomes taken from RCTs

Yes; data from literature

Yes

Yes

Francis, 1999

Dalteparin 2,500 units, then 5,000 units versus warfarin for 10 days

THR

Yes; outcomes taken from RCTs

Yes; costs from participating hospitals in RCT

Yes; for costs

Yes

Botteman, 2002

Enoxaparin 30 mg daily versus warfarin 5 mg daily for 7 days

THR

Yes; outcomes taken from RCTs

Yes; data from literature

Yes

Yes

Caprini, 2002

Enoxaparin 30 mg twice daily for 7 days versus UFH 5,000 units 3 times daily and warfarin for 10 days

THR

Yes; outcomes taken from RCTs

Yes; data from literature

Yes

Yes

Levin, 2001

Desirudin 15 mg twice daily versus enoxaparin 40 mg daily for 10 days

THR

Yes; outcomes taken from RCTs

Yes; data from literature

Yes

Yes

Honorato, 2004

Bemiparin 3,500 units daily versus enoxaparin 40 mg daily for 8-12 days

TKR

Yes; outcomes taken from RCTs

Yes; data from National Health Care Institute, pharmacists association

Yes

Yes

Attanasio, 2001

Dermatan sulfate 300 mg daily versus UFH 5,000 units 3 times daily for 7 days

Surgical oncology

Yes; outcomes taken from RCTs

Yes - data from hospital costs

Yes

Yes

Wade, 2001

Tinzaparin 3,500 units versus enoxaparin 30 mg twice daily for 8 weeks

Spinal cord injury

Yes; outcomes taken from RCTs

Yes; data from different hospitals, DRG

Yes

Yes

      

Were estimates and costs related to the baseline risk in treatment population- are these results generalizable?

Gordois, 2003

Enoxaparin 40 mg daily versus fondaparinux 2.5 mg daily for 5-9 days

THR, HFS

Yes; outcomes taken from RCTs

Yes; data from NICE

Yes

Yes

Lundkvist, 2003

Fondaparinux 2.5 mg daily versus enoxaparin 40 mg daily for 7 days

THR, HFS

Yes; outcomes taken from RCTs

Yes; data from literature

Yes

Yes

Wade, 2003

Fondaparinux 2.5 mg daily versus enoxaparin 40 mg daily versus 30 mg twice daily for 7-10 days

HFS

Yes; outcomes taken from RCTs

Yes; data from literature

Yes

Yes

Szucs, 2003

Fondaparinux 2.5 mg daily versus enoxaparin 40 mg daily for 7 days

THR, TKR HFS

Yes; outcomes taken from RCTs

Yes; data from literature and surveys in Switzerland

Yes

Yes

Sullivan, 2004

Fondaparinux 2.5 mg daily versus enoxaparin 40 mg daily for 7 days

THR, TKR HFS

Yes; outcomes taken from RCTs

Yes; costs from review of 220 acute care hospitals

Yes

Yes

Dranitsaris, 2004

Fondaparinux 2.5 mg daily versus enoxaparin 40 mg daily for 7 days

THR, HFS

Yes; outcomes taken from a meta-analysis

Data from CIHI, surveys

Yes

Yes

Spruill, 2004

Fondaparinux 2.5 mg daily versus enoxaparin 30 mg twice daily for 4-5 days

TKA

Yes; outcomes taken from RCTs

Yes; data from literature

Yes

Yes

Spruill, 2004

Fondaparinux 2.5 mg daily versus enoxaparin 30 mg twice daily for 10 days

THR

Yes; outcomes taken from RCTs

Yes; data from literature

Yes

Yes

Wade, 2004

Fondaparinux 2.5 mg daily versus enoxaparin 40 mg daily for 7 days

HFS

Yes; outcomes taken from RCTs

Yes; data from literature

Yes

Yes

Bjorvatn, 2005

Fondaparinux 2.5 mg daily versus enoxaparin 40 mg daily for 7 days

THR, TKR HFS

Yes; outcomes taken from RCTs

Yes; data from Norwegian national sources

Yes

Yes

Wolowacz 2009

THR Dabigatran 220 mg daily versus enoxaparin 40 mg daily for 28-35 days TKR Dabigatran 220 mg daily for versus enoxaparin 40 mg daily 6-10 days

THR, TKR

Yes; outcomes taken from RCTs

Yes; data from UK national sources

Yes

Yes

McCullagh, 2009

THR Dabigatran 220 mg daily for 35 days versus rivaroxaban 10 mg daily for 35 days versus enoxaparin 40 mg daily for 14 days TKR Dabigatran 220 mg daily for 14 days versus rivaroxaban 10 mg daily for 10 days versus enoxaparin 40 mg daily for 10 days

THR, TKR

Yes; outcomes taken from RCTs

Yes; data from literature and Irish national sources

Yes

Yes

Pechevis, 2000

Yes

N/R

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Lloyd, 2001

Yes

N/R

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Lamy, 2002

Yes

N/R

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Offord, 2003

Yes

N/R

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Schadlich, 2006

Incompletely

N/R

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Drummond, 1994

Incompletely

N/R

No

Yes

Yes

Likely

Hawkins, 1997

Yes

N/R

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Marchetti, 1999

Incompletely

N/R

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Etchells, 1999

Yes

N/R

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

McGarry, 2004

Incompletely

N/R

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Article

Were incremental costs and outcomes measured?

Do incremental costs and outcomes differ between subgroups?

Does allowance for uncertainty change results?

Are prophylaxis benefits worth the harm and costs?

Generalizability: could other patient populations expect similar outcomes?

Generalizability: could other patient populations expect to experience similar costs?

Heerey, 2005

Incompletely

N/R

No

Yes

Yes

Likely

Deitelzweig, 2008

Yes

N/R

No

Yes

Yes

Likely

Wade, 2008

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

O'Brien, 1994

Yes

N/R

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Menzin, 1995

Yes

N/R

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Hull, 1997

Yes

N/R

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Hawkins, 1998

Yes

N/R

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Francis, 1999

Yes

Yes

Yes

Likely

Yes

Yes

Botteman, 2002

Incompletely

N/R

No

Yes

Perhaps

Yes

Nerurkar, 2002

Incompletely

N/R

No

Yes

Perhaps

Yes

Levin, 2001

Incompletely

N/R

No

Yes

Yes

Likely

Caprini, 2002

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Likely

 

Were incremental costs and outcomes measured?

Do incremental costs and outcomes differ between subgroups?

Does allowance for uncertainty change results?

Are prophylaxis benefits worth the harm and costs?

Generalizability: could other patient populations expect similar outcomes?

Generalizability: could other patient populations expect to experience similar costs?

Honorato, 2004

Yes

N/R

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Wade, 2001

Incompletely

N/R

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Gordois, 2003

Yes

N/R

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Wade, 2003

Yes

N/R

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Annemans, 2004

Yes

N/R

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Attanasio, 2001

Yes

N/R

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Szucs, 2003

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Sullivan, 2004

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Dranitsaris, 2004

Yes

N/R

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Spruill, 2004

Yes

N/R

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Spruill, 2004

Yes

N/R

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Wade, 2004

Yes

N/R

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Bjorvatn, 2005

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Wolowacz 2009

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

McCullagh 2009

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

  1. CIHI, Canadian Institute for Health Information; DRG, diagnosis-related group; HFS, hip fracture surgery; NICE, National Centre for Clinical Excellence
  2. N/R, not reported; OHIP, Ontario Health Insurance Plan; RCT, randomized controlled trial; THR, total hip replacement; TKR, total knee replacement; UFH, unfractionated heparin.