Open Access

Survival following AAA repair

  • Richard Venn1
Critical Care20003:5178

DOI: 10.1186/ccf-2000-5178

Published: 12 May 2000

Comments

Despite the relatively small patient numbers in this study, the results are interesting and important conclusions can be drawn. Hospital mortality remains high (69%) following emergency repair of ruptured emergency abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), results from this study parallel other study findings that survival rate is relatively static, remaining similar to survival rate for elective AAA repair if you are discharged from hospital. For this population, there was no difference in outcome between operations performed by vascular and nonvascular surgeons. This fits with other observations that a major determinant of survival is pre-operative hypotension, ie the shorter the time to cross-clamping, the better the survival. This conflicts with the 'hub and spoke' policy for vascular services, where ruptured AAAs are transferred from the district general hospital (DGH) to a vascular centre for surgery, which inevitably prolongs the time to cross-clamping. Definitive surgery should occur rapidly at the point of entry into the hospital system, and this may mean the vascular surgeon travelling to the patient if survival is to be improved. Finally, we need to address the problem of the appalling survival rate in those aged over 80 years, and decide on whether we should be offering a scarce resource (intensive therapy unit [ITU] bed) to patients with a hopeless outcome. It is to be hoped that the audit by the Vascular Anaesthetic Society will provide us with more extensive data with which to make these important decisions.

Introduction

Emergency AAA repair carries a mortality of greater than 50%, in contrast to figures quoted for elective repair of 1.5 - 7%. Patients with AAA greater than 5 cm in diameter have a 5 year survival of 25% without an operation. This study examines the 5 year mortality data for emergency AAA repair in a DGH in the UK.

Methods

. 5 year retrospective observational study.

. Outcome: Survival following emergency surgery for AAA rupture.

Results

Ninety nine patients, with a mean age of 75.2 years, underwent emergency surgery for AAA rupture over the study period. Operating theatre survival was 75.8%, postoperative ITU survival was 40.4%, and overall hospital survival 31.3% (compared to 96% hospital survival for elective AAA repair). At the end of the follow-up period 22/99 (22.2%) patients were still alive (median survival 4.4 years). Mean length of ITU stay was 6.8 days for survivors and 7.9 days for those who died in hospital. Eleven patients required haemofiltration, but no patients required long-term dialysis. Twenty-six percent of patients were aged over 80 years and the mortality of this group was 96%.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
St George's Hospital

References

  1. Milner QJW, Burchett KR: Long-term survival following emergency abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Anaesthesia. 2000, 55: 432-435.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Current Science Ltd 2000

Advertisement