Open Access

Prospective, randomized trial comparing fluids and dobutamine optimization of oxygen delivery in high-risk surgical patients [ISRCTN42445141]

  • Suzana M Lobo1Email author,
  • Francisco R Lobo1,
  • Carlos A Polachini1,
  • Daniela S Patini1,
  • Adriana E Yamamoto1,
  • Neymar E de Oliveira1,
  • Patricia Serrano1,
  • Helder S Sanches1,
  • Marco A Spegiorin1,
  • Marcio M Queiroz1,
  • Antonio C ChristianoJr1,
  • Elisangela F Savieiro1,
  • Paula A Alvarez1,
  • Silvia P Teixeira1 and
  • Geni S Cunrath1
Critical Care200610:R72

DOI: 10.1186/cc4913

Received: 16 March 2006

Accepted: 6 April 2006

Published: 12 May 2006

Abstract

Introduction

Preventing perioperative tissue oxygen debt contributes to a better postoperative recovery. Whether the beneficial effects of fluids and inotropes during optimization of the oxygen delivery index (DO2I) in high-risk patients submitted to major surgeries are due to fluids, to inotropes, or to the combination of the two is not known. We aimed to investigate the effect of DO2I optimization with fluids or with fluids and dobutamine on the 60-day hospital mortality and incidence of complications.

Methods

A randomized and controlled trial was performed in 50 high-risk patients (elderly with coexistent pathologies) undergoing major elective surgery. Therapy consisted of pulmonary artery catheter-guided hemodynamic optimization during the operation and 24 hours postoperatively using either fluids alone (n = 25) or fluids and dobutamine (n = 25), aiming to achieve supranormal values (DO2I > 600 ml/minute/m2).

Results

The cardiovascular depression was an important component in the perioperative period in this group of patients. Cardiovascular complications in the postoperative period occurred significantly more frequently in the volume group (13/25, 52%) than in the dobutamine group (4/25, 16%) (relative risk, 3.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.22–8.60; P < 0.05). The 60-day mortality rates were 28% in the volume group and 8% in the dobutamine group (relative risk, 3.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.67–13.46; not significant).

Conclusion

In patients with high risk of perioperative death, pulmonary artery catheter-guided hemodynamic optimization using dobutamine determines better outcomes, whereas fluids alone increase the incidence of postoperative complications.

Introduction

Mortality is unacceptably high in certain groups of surgical patients [1]. Advanced age, extensive surgical trauma, cancer, blood transfusions, and poor nutritional state are conditions reported to be associated with severe changes of the body's defense mechanisms, making the patient highly susceptible to morbidity and mortality [24]. Sepsis and multiple organ failure remains the most common cause of death [5].

Some authors have shown that the optimization of the oxygen delivery index (DO2I > 600 ml/minute/m2), guided by a pulmonary artery catheter, in the perioperative period of high-risk patients determined better survival and less episodes of complications when initiated before the development of organ failure and when therapy produced differences in oxygen delivery [511]. The term 'optimization' refers to therapeutic intervention mainly with fluids, inotropic drugs and red blood cells, aiming at a better cardiovascular function anticipating the increase in oxygen demand during surgery. The main objective is to maintain tissue perfusion to minimize the hepatosplanchnic ischemia, thus assuring organic function.

High-risk surgical patients often present a decreased intravascular volume prior to a surgical procedure due to various factors. The importance of fluid replacement in the perioperative period cannot be underestimated [12]. Anesthetic induction still results in increases in systemic vascular capacitance and, to a certain extent, in myocardial depression. Patients with chronic heart failure can face a series of events during prolonged surgery that may end in acute decompensation. Even critically ill patients without preexisting myocardial contractile dysfunction may sustain severe perioperative complications with subsequent acute heart failure [13].

In previous randomized controlled trials in high-risk surgical patients, after the adequate recovery of volemia, either dobutamine or dopexamine have been used with the objective to optimize the cardiac index and/or the oxygen delivery [610]. Older patients with existing cardiorespiratory illness undergoing major surgery have a reduced morbidity and mortality when dobutamine is used to maximize oxygen transport [10]. Nevertheless, in certain groups of surgical patients, goal-directed therapy using fluids alone improved the outcome [1417]. Evidence that optimization of fluid therapy, in the absence of inotropes, reduces mortality in high-risk patients is not available. The primary outcome measure of the present study was to evaluate the effect of both DO2I optimization with fluids or with fluids and dobutamine on the 60-day mortality in high-risk general surgery patients. The second outcome measure was the incidence of complications, particularly cardiovascular adverse events.

Materials and methods

This study, approved by the Institutional Review Board, was carried out in the operating room and the intensive care unit (ICU) (24 beds) of a tertiary hospital. The informed consent to take part in the study was obtained from the patient or from their closest relative. Patients undergoing elective surgeries were admitted to the study if they assigned ≥ 3 points according to a risk scoring system (Table 1) adapted from American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines [18]. The exclusion criteria were refusal of consent, hemodynamic instability prior to surgery, congestive heart failure, presence of infection, acute myocardial ischemia prior to enrolment, life expectancy lower than 60 days, and disseminated malignancy.
Table 1

Risk scoring system (adapted from American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines)

Score

Risk factor

High-risk surgery (1 point)

Gastrectomy

Pancreatectomy

Total colectomy

Total esophagectomy

Another long surgical procedure associated with large fluid shifts or blood losses

Minor clinical predictor (1 point)

Diabetes (defined as standard taking medication or not)

Abnormal electrocardiogram (left ventricular hypertrophy, left bundle-branch block, ST-T abnormalities, atrial fibrillation)

Low functional capacity (inability to climb one flight of stairs with a bag of groceries)

Arrhythmia (using drugs)

History of stroke

Arterial hypertension (Difficult controlling).

Intermediate clinical predictor (2 points)

Age (>60 years)

Angina (class I or II, Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classification) or previous infarctus or Q waves

Compensated or previous decompensated heart failure (defined as standard)

Chronic hepatic failure (defined as standard)

Chronic renal failure (preoperative creatinine > 2.0 mg/dl or need for dialysis)

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (defined as standard) or severe respiratory illness resulting in functional limitation

Major clinical predictor (3 points)

Angina (class III or IV, Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classification) Severe arrhythmias (advanced heart block, ventricular arrhythmia in the presence of cardiopathy or supraventricular arrhythmia with tachycardia) Severe valvopathy (severe valvular regurgitation with reduced left ventricular function)

Measurements of hemodynamic and oxygenation variables

The electrocardiograph, pulse oxymetry and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were monitored continuously during the study period. A pulmonary artery catheter was introduced prior to surgery in the ICU or in the operating room (Balloon Thermodilution Catheter, 7 F, 3 lumen TD, Arrow F; Arrow International, Inc., Reading, PA, USA) and mixed venous blood samples (pulmonary artery) were taken for analysis of the pH, PaO2, PaCO2, arterial oxygen saturation, mixed venous oxygen saturation, hematocrit and hemoglobin levels, and lactate (OMNI Modular System AVL Roswell, GA, USA). Cardiac output measurements were obtained using thermodilution methods as previously described [10]. Measurements of the cardiac index, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP) and mixed venous and arterial blood gas were obtained directly each hour during the surgery and each 4 hours after admission to the ICU during 24 hours; the other variables were calculated according to standard formulae. The maximum PAOP was defined as the higher value of PAOP obtained during surgery and 24 hours postoperatively.

Management

The patients were randomized with the use of sealed envelopes (blocks of 10 patients) to either the volume group or the dobutamine group. To induce and maintain anesthesia the following drugs were used: midazolam, 0.05–0.10 mg/kg; etomidate, 0.3 mg/kg; sufentanil, 1 μg/kg (maintenance, 0.01 μg/kg/minute); atracurium, 0.5 mg/kg (maintenance, 0–10 μg/kg/minute); and isoflurane. The therapeutic goals were the same in both groups: maintenance of DO2I > 600 ml/minute/m2, MAP between 70 and 110 mmHg, PAOP between 12 and 16 mmHg, hematocrit > 30%, arterial oxygen saturation > 94%, and urinary output > 0.5 ml/kg/hour.

The patients randomly selected for the volume group were treated with fluids according to the treatment algorithm (Figure 1). The patients randomized to the dobutamine group received the first fluid cycle during 60–90 minutes followed by increasing doses of dobutamine, beginning with 3 μg/kg/minute, until the goal was reached. The patient should receive a new fluid cycle if the PAOP decreased for less than 12 mmHg or if there was a strong clinical suspicion of hypovolemia.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fcc4913/MediaObjects/13054_2006_Article_4436_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Treatment algorithm. MAP, mean arterial pressure; PAOP, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure; Ht, hematocrit; SaO2, arterial oxygen saturation; DO2I, oxygen delivery index; RBC, red blood cells; CI, cardiac index.

The heart rate, rhythm and MAP were carefully monitored and the dose of dobutamine was decreased or interrupted in the case of hypotension (MAP < 70 mmHg) and/or in the presence of signs of myocardial ischemia (depressed ST segment or inexplicable hypotension or tachycardia). The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores were calculated after admission to the ICU [19]. The C-reactive protein serum level (nephelometry) was evaluated after surgery as a marker of inflammation. The dobutamine infusion was maintained for 24 hours in the postoperative period and then was slowly reduced until complete interruption. The mechanical ventilation and weaning were performed according to the ICU routine. Fentanyl and midazolam were used for sedation and analgesia.

Outcome

The patient was defined as an achiever when DO2I > 600 ml/minute/m2 was attained for at least one time point. Patients were followed up for 60 days. Diagnosis of complications was based on predefined criteria. Acute heart failure was designated by the presence of signs of myocardial dysfunction with PAOP > 18 mmHg and cardiac index < 2.2 l/minute/m2. Pulmonary edema was considered in the presence of radiological signs of pulmonary edema along with PAOP > 18 mmHg and clinical repercussion leading to prolonged mechanical ventilation/ICU stay or reintubation. Acute myocardial infarction was considered in the presence of electrocardiographic signs of ischemia with an increase of cardiac enzymes and/or segmental changes in the echocardiogram. Arrhythmia was considered when a different cardiac rhythm with hemodynamic repercussions or a need for anti-arrhythmic drugs was recorded. Mesenteric infarction due to acute insufficiency of the splanchnic blood flow was designated by direct visualization during emergent surgery.

Postoperative bleeding was defined as the presence of bleeding requiring new surgical exploration or the transfusion of more than 2 units blood derivatives. Gastrointestinal bleeding was considered as standard. Acute renal failure was defined as an increase greater then two times in the creatinine serum level in the postoperative period in patients with previous normal renal function. Acute respiratory failure was defined as a PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≤ 200 mmHg and PAOP < 18 mmHg and a need for invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilation. For nosocomial infections, Centers for Disease Control definitions were used [20]. Postoperative fistulas and dehiscence of anastomosis were determined by visualizing the elimination of intestinal content via drain, wound, or abnormal orifice and by dehiscence of the surgical wound when there is a superficial or deep opening of the wound. The diagnosis of severe sepsis and septic shock were defined according to the American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine [21]. An investigator who was unaware of patient allocation by analyzing medical records as well as all radiological and laboratory investigations undertook evaluation of complications retrospectively.

Statistical analysis

The size of the sample was based on 60-day inhospital mortality rates estimated at 40% for the volume group and 15% for the dobutamine group (assuming that optimization with fluids alone would be the same as no optimization) [6, 10]. To have a study power of 80% and a two-sided test with a significance of 0.05, 49 patients would be required in each group. The first statistical evaluation was to be performed when 50% of the patients were enrolled to seek differences either on primary outcomes or on second outcomes. At this point, statistically significant differences were found in major outcomes. It was thought unethical to continue and the study was terminated.

Continuous variables were compared with Student's t test. Analysis of variance was used for repeated measurements. When there were significant statistical differences the Bonferroni test was used to detect at which moment the differences occurred. The incidence of complications and mortality rates were evaluated with the relative risk (RR) (95% confidence interval (CI)). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Over an 18-month period (from May 2002 to July 2004) there were 594 admissions of patients undergoing surgery for postoperative care in the ICU, and 432 of these were elective surgeries. A total of 72 patients (16.5%) were recognized as fulfilling the entrance criteria and 51 patients were enrolled into the study. Twenty-one patients were not enrolled; two because of patient refusal and 19 due to logistic reasons (for example, unavailability of an ICU bed or a theater room, the attending physician's refusal). One patient then had the planned surgical procedure changed to a palliative surgery due to disseminated malignancy and was withdrawn. Fifty patients completed the study: 25 in the volume group and 25 in the dobutamine group.

The demographic data of the patients are presented in Table 2. The therapeutic interventions and perfusion variables are presented in Table 3. In the first 24 hours after ICU admission, the patients in the volume group received significantly more red blood cells than those in dobutamine group (1064 ± 684 ml versus 650 ± 226 ml, respectively; P < 0.05). In the volume group, two patients received dobutamine intraoperatively and six patients received dobutamine postoperatively due to a cardiac index lower than 2.5 l/minute/m2 according to the treatment algorithm. Dobutamine was discontinued in five patients in the dobutamine group in the postoperative period either due to tachycardia or arterial hypertension. The percentage of goal-achievers intraoperatively was 28% in the volume group (7/25) in comparison with 84% in the dobutamine group (21/25) (RR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.17–0.63). In the ICU, significantly less patients in the volume group (16/25, 64%) than in the dobutamine group (22/25, 88%) were goal-achievers (RR = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.52–1.00). At the end of the optimization therapy there were 76% achievers in the volume group (19/25) and 96% in the dobutamine group (24/25) (RR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.62–1.00).
Table 2

Baseline characteristics of patients in the volume group and the dobutamine group

 

Volume group

Dobutamine group

Number of patients

25

25

Male (%)

69

76

Age

69.9 ± 8.4

67.6 ± 7.5

Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score

14.4 ± 6.2

12.4 ± 6.5

Risk Scoring System (points)

4.25 ± 1.22

4.44 ± 1.53

Aged > 60 years

23 (92%)

20 (80%)

Cancer

24 (96%)

25 (100%)

Arterial hypertension

16 (64%)

13 (52%)

Coronary artery disease

6 (24%)

5 (20%)

Diabetes mellitus

5 (20%)

2 (8%)

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

4 (16%)

0 (0%)

Arrhythmia

3 (12%)

2 (8%)

Cerebral vascular accident

1 (4%)

0 (0%)

Compensated heart failure

2 (8%)

3 (12%)

Chronic renal failure

0 (0%)

1 (4%)

Type of surgery

  

   Colorectal

9

5

   Hepatobiliary

1

1

   Duodenopancreatectomy

2

5

   Esofagectomy

1

3

   Gastrectomy

6

5

   Urology

5

4

   Other

1

2

Table 3

Therapeutic interventions and changes in perfusion variables during optimization

 

Volume group

Dobutamine group

Intraoperatively

  

   Operation time (min)

315 ± 109

331 ± 132

   Total volume (l/hour)

1.31 ± 0.54 (0.97/1.21/1.54)

1.35 ± 0.43 (1.05/1.29/1.65)

   Red blood cells (ml)

609 ± 244 (480/600/600)

713 ± 458 (500/600/650)

   Number of transfused patients (%)

11 (44%)

12 (48%)

   Dobutamine doses (μg/kg/minute)

3.5 ± 0.7

5.5 ± 1.8

   Dobutamine (number of patients)

2 (8%)

25 (100%)*

   Initial serum lactate (mEq/l)

1.3 ± 0.6

1.3 ± 0.5

   Final serum lactate (mEq/l)

1.7 ± 0.7

1.9 ± 0.9

   Initial mixed venous oxygen saturation

83 ± 4

81 ± 6

   Final mixed venous oxygen saturation

86 ± 4

86 ± 7

   Number of goal-achievers

7 (28%)

21 (84%)*

Intensive care unit

  

   Total volume (l/hours)

0.29 ± 0.12

0.28 ± 0.18

   Red blood cells (ml)

1064 ± 684 (450/600/900)

650 ± 226* (600/600/600)

   Number of transfused patients (%)

7 (28%)

6 (24%)

   Dobutamine doses (μg/kg/minute)

5.7 ± 2.3

6.1 ± 3.4

   Dobutamine (number of patients)

6 (24%)

20 (80%)*

   Sodium nitroprusside

6 (24%)

2 (8%)

   Initial serum lactate (mEq/l)

2.5 ± 1.6

2.2 ± 0.8

   Final serum lactate (mEq/l)

1.9 ± 2.0

1.3 ± 0.4

   Initial mixed venous oxygen saturation

76 ± 13

78 ± 9

   Final mixed venous oxygen saturation

78 ± 9

77 ± 8

   Number of goal-achievers

16 (64%)

22 (88%)*

Data presented as the absolute value (%) or as the mean ± standard deviation. *P < 0.05 versus volume group.

Figure 2 shows the temporal pattern of the DO2I during surgery and postoperatively for the volume and dobutamine groups. An important DO2I reduction was seen after the start of anesthesia in both groups. While a recovery was seen in the dobutamine group, however, the DO2I remained significantly lower in the volume group in comparison with baseline, with a statistically significance difference at 4 and 6 hours intraoperatively and at 0, 4, 8, 12 and 16 hours postoperatively (P < 0.05 for all). The dobutamine group had a significantly higher DO2I than the volume group during surgery (at 4 hours, 695 ± 176 versus 485 ± 134 ml/minute/m2; at 6 hours, 703 ± 99 versus 474 ± 134 ml/minute/m2; dobutamine group versus volume group, P < 0.05 for both) and postoperatively (at 0 hours, 500 ± 151 versus 410 ± 113 ml/minute/m2; at 4 hours, 580 ± 204 versus 463 ± 122 ml/minute/m2; at 8 hours, 593 ± 172 versus 485 ± 144 ml/minute/m2; dobutamine group versus volume group, P < 0.05 for all).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fcc4913/MediaObjects/13054_2006_Article_4436_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Oxygen delivery index during surgery and postoperatively. Oxygen delivery index (DO2I) during surgery and postoperatively for the volume group () and the dobutamine group (■). *P < 0.05 versus volume group, #P < 0.05 versus baseline. Results presented as the mean and standard error or the mean. 0, preoperative; 1, 30 min intraoperatively; 2, 2 hours intraoperatively; 3, 4 hours intraoperatively; 4, 6 hours intraoperatively; 5, 8 hours intraoperatively; 6, 0 hours postoperatively; 7, 4 hours postoperatively; 8, 8 hours postoperatively; 10, 12 hours postoperatively; 11, 16 hours postoperatively; 12, 24 hours postoperatively.

The temporal patterns of the cardiac index, left ventricular stroke work index (LVSWI) and PAOP during surgery and postoperatively are presented in Table 4. The LVSWI significantly decreased in both groups during the operation and was significantly lower in the volume group (41 ± 13 g/m/m2) than in the dobutamine group (48 ± 9 g/m/m2) at 4 hours. The levels of PAOP were significantly higher in the volume group at 6 hours postoperatively in comparison with the dobutamine group (11 ± 3.3 versus 8 ± 1.6 mmHg, P < 0.05). The maximum PAOP was significantly higher in the volume group than in the dobutamine group, both intraoperatively and postoperatively (14.4 ± 3.8 versus 12.4 ± 2.9 mmHg and 16.0 ± 3.1 versus 14.1 ± 3.4 mmHg, respectively; P < 0.05).
Table 4

Hemodynamic and perfusion variables during surgery and postoperatively

 

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

Cardiac index (l/minute/m2)

             

   Volume group

3.6/1.1 (25)

3.2/1.1 (25)

3.3/0.8 (22)

3.5/0.6 (15)

3.4/0.8 (13)

3.9/0.8 (4)

2.5/0.7

2.9/0.8

3.1/0.9

3.2/0.8

3.5/0.9

3.8/1.2

3.7/0.6

   Dobutamine group

3.4/0.7 (25)

3.0/0.8 (25)

4.0/1.0*# (22)

4.6/1.2* # (13)

4.5/0.5* # (10)

4.6/0.7# (8)

3.0/0.9*

3.6/1.0*

3.8/1.0*

3.9/0.8* #

3.9/0.7#

4.0/0.8#

4.0/0.9#

Left ventricular stroke work index (g/m/m2)

             

   Volume group

65/22 (25)

43/12# (25)

43/12# (22)

41/13# (15)

46/12# (10)

45/11 (4)

37/13#

37/15#

41/23#

42/28#

46/18#

45/22#

42/18#

   Dobutamine group

58/15 (25)

43/13# (25)

49/17 (22)

48/9* # (13)

50/14 (10)

49/18 (8)

39/18#

43/20#

41/19#

42/21#

41/20#

43/17#

42/16#

Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (mmHg)

             

   Volume group

12/4.3 (25)

12/4.3 (25)

10/3.0 (22)

10/3.0 (14)

11/3.3 (12)

8/1.1 (3)

9/4.1

11/4.7

13/4.5

11/4.6

12/3.5

12/3.3

12/3.9

   Dobutamine group

11/4.0 (25)

12/3.3 (25)

10/2.9 (22)

9/2.5 (13)

8/1.6* # (10)

10/1.1 (8)

9/3.3

10/3.9

11/3.5

11/4.4

11/4.4

11/3.7

12/3.3

Lactate (mEq/l)

             

   Volume group

1.3/0.6

1.3/0.6

1.2/0.5

1.7/0.6

2.5/1.6

2.8/2.0

2.5/1.6

2.8/1.9

2.0/1.9

2.2/2.0

2.1/2.4

1.9/1.8

1.9/2.0

   Dobutamine group

1.3/0.5

1.4/0.8

1.9/0.6

1.2/0.4

2.2/0.8

1.9/0.8

2.2/0.8

1.9/0.8

1.6/0.6

1.6/0.8

1.7/0.8

1.3/0.8

1.3/0.4

Mixed venous oxygen saturation (%)

             

   Volume group

83/4

-

86/3

86/5

86/5

86/2

76/13

73/11

76/15

77/10

77/10

77/11

78/9

   Dobutamine group

81/6

-

86/2

87/5

85/6

83/11

78/9

80/10

80/9

77/11

79/7

77/8

77/8

Results presented as mean/standard deviation. 0, preoperative; 1, 30 minutes intraoperatively; 2, 2 hours intraoperatively; 3, 4 hours intraoperatively; 4, 6 hours intraoperatively; 5, 8 hours intraoperatively; 6, 0 hours postoperatively; 7, 4 hours postoperatively; 8, 8 hours postoperatively; 10, 12 hours postoperatively; 11, 16 hours postoperatively; 12, 24 hours postoperatively. *P < 0.05 versus volume group, #P < 0.05 versus baseline.

Postoperative complications

Cardiovascular complications in the postoperative period occurred significantly more frequently in the volume group (13/25, 52%) than in the dobutamine group (4/25, 16%) (RR = 3.25, 95% CI = 1.22–8.60) (Table 5). The prevalence of infection was similar in both groups (volume group, 28%; dobutamine group, 48%; not significant). Complications occurred in 74% of the achievers in the volume group (14/19) and in 58% of the achievers in the dobutamine group (14/24) (not significant).
Table 5

Outcome

 

Volume group

Dobutamine group

Cardiovascular complications

  

   Acute heart failure

2

0

   Pulmonary edema

8

3

   Acute myocardial infarction

0

1

   Cardiac arrhythmia

2

0

   Mesenteric infarction

1

0

   Number of patients with cardiovascular complications (%)

13 (52%)

4 (16%)*

Infectious complications

  

   Pneumonia

5

7

   Peritonitis

3

3

   Urinary tract infection

1

2

   Fistula

1

2

   Severe sepsis/septic shock

7

4

   Number of patients with infectious complications (%)

7 (28%)

12 (48%)

Other complications

  

   Postoperative bleeding

1

0

   Upper gastrointestinal bleeding

0

1

   Acute renal failure

3

1

   Acute respiratory failure

5

2

   Number of patients with other complications (%)

9 (36%)

4 (16%)

Total number of complications

39

26

   Number of patients with complications (%)

17(68%)

14(56%)

   Number of achievers with complications (%)

14 (74%)

14 (58%)

   C-reactive protein on day 1 (mg/dl)

18 (11-23)

13 (10-18)

   Median duration of intensive care unit stay (days)

3 (2.0-6.0)

3(3.0-8.5)

   Median duration of hospital stay (days)

14 (8.5-8.5)

20 (14.5-32)

Mortality rate

  

   28 days

5 (20%)

2 (8%)

   60 days

7 (28%)

2 (8%)

Data presented as the absolute value (%) or as the median (interquartile range). *P < 0.05 versus volume group.

Mortality

There were no significant differences in 28-day or 60-day mortality. The 28-day mortality rates were 20% in the volume group and 8% in the dobutamine group. The 60-day mortality rates were 28% in volume group and 8% in dobutamine group (RR = 3.0, 95% CI = 0.67–13.46).

Discussion

Fluids improve morbidity and mortality when combined with inotropes during major surgeries. Randomized controlled trials evaluated the effect of perioperative optimization on mortality in high-risk surgical patients using either dobutamine or dopexamine to improve the DO2I [610]. These studies did not investigate the effects of fluids alone. In the present study there was a significant reduction in postoperative complications, particularly cardiovascular complications, and a nonsignificant reduction in mortality in the group optimized with dobutamine and fluids in comparison with the group optimized with fluids alone. Nevertheless, significantly more patients in the dobutamine group were goal-achievers, suggesting an important role of the inotrope in the optimization therapy in this group of high-risk patients submitted to elective surgeries.

Unexpectedly, despite the use of two different treatment algorithms driven to obtain a DO2I > 600 ml/minute/m2, both groups had received similar amounts of fluids at the end of the optimization therapy. The presence of decreasing values of the LVSWI suggests contractility problems in both groups. A better recovery of the LVSWI was seen in the dobutamine group during the operative trauma. By counteracting the adverse events of the fluids, dobutamine probably made a more generous fluid infusion possible alongside fewer complications in this group. In contrast, significantly higher values of the maximum PAOP in response to fluid challenges suggested that poor cardiovascular reserves limited the fluid infusion in the volume group.

The mechanism of the protective effect of dobutamine is still not completely elucidated. Impaired tissue perfusion due to hypovolemia, disturbed vasoregulation, and myocardial dysfunction contributes to multiple organ dysfunctions that can be prevented by the prompt compensation of the oxygen debt by maintaining supranormal values intraoperatively and in the very early postoperative period [6, 10, 22, 23]. Significantly, more patients were achievers in the dobutamine group than in the volume group, especially in the intraoperative period. If therapy-induced differences in oxygen delivery determine better outcomes, then our results suggest that the use of inotropes is necessary during the optimization therapy in this group of high-risk patients [11]. It is also possible that some beneficial effects observed were related to inotropes' therapy effects in regulating inflammation. Higher levels of C-reactive protein, an inflammation marker, have been detected in volume group; however, the study was precociously terminated and the results were not statistically significant [24]. Nevertheless, dobutamine improves microcirculatory perfusion and increases splanchnic blood flow, which could prevent more inflammation secondary to the tissue hypoxia and to the translocation of bacterial products or endotoxin [25, 26].

The hospital stay was slightly longer in the dobutamine group despite the fact that the complications and mortality rates were lower in this group. Other authors reported a significant reduction in hospital stay mainly due to the reduction of postoperative infection with postoperative goal-directed therapy using dopexamine to attain a DO2I > 600 ml/minute/m2 – a finding different from the present study [23]. The choice of inotrope may play a role. Dopexamine may confer an additional advantage to fluid optimization by reducing the effect of infective complications. In different studies on optimization, both inotropes (dobutamine and dopexamine) produced the desired preoperative increase in oxygen delivery. Only dopexamine, however, seems to reduce the hospital stay and infectious complications.

Several potential limitations in our study require comment. First, blinding was not possible for evaluating outcome and there was a small imbalance in comorbidities that could determine case-mix differences between groups.

Second, the volume group received about two times more packed red blood cells than the dobutamine group. It is probable that this group needed more transfusions due to either the presence of defective tissue perfusion signs or to differences in blood losses between groups [27]. Transfusion of blood derivatives is an independent risk factor for worse outcome [28]. The complications related to the transfusion of blood derivatives are infectious most of the time, however, which in fact did not occur in the present study.

Third, it is possible that the therapeutic approach in the volume group was not aggressive enough once many patients failed to achieve the targeted DO2I levels. Indeed, the PAOP was between 8 and 13 mmHg, although the algorithm suggested that it had to be pushed up to 16 mmHg. The significantly higher values of maximum PAOP seen in this volume group, however, suggest the presence of a poor cardiovascular reserve limiting fluid challenge more than the presence of hypovolemia.

Finally, it is possible that the sample size calculation of 40% mortality rate for this population of elective high-risk surgery patients was overestimated and the study was underpowered. We believe, however, that the association of a median of four risk surgery criteria determines a higher risk population than those reported by other authors [79, 29].

Fluid optimization alone reduced complications and improved recovery times in certain groups of surgical patients [1416]. Associations between postoperative fluid overload and poor survival have been shown in other studies, however, and better outcomes after restrictive fluid resuscitation regimens after surgery were reported [3032]. The numbers of cardiopulmonary and tissue-healing complications were significantly reduced when a restricted fluid regimen in the perioperative period was used in a randomized multicenter trial after colorectal surgery [30]. Another prospective study comparing the use of restrictive versus liberal fluid management on postoperative outcome in patients undergoing elective intraabdominal surgery showed less complications in the restrictive group than in liberal group [31]. We must consider, however, that these studies have been carried out in groups of less severely ill patients and with better cardiovascular reserve. Furthermore, different therapeutic regimens and patient populations make the comparison of these studies difficult.

The cardiovascular depression was an important component of the hemodynamic response in the perioperative period in this group of patients. The reductions observed in the DO2I and in the myocardial contractility evaluated by the LVSWI were dramatic, especially at two important points of the perioperative period: after the induction of anesthesia and after transport to the ICU. These findings suggest that special attention should be directed to the hemodynamic support at these moments. In addition, patient safety may be enhanced by increasing the use of beta-blockers in high-risk patients and perioperative treatment with beta-blockers is now widely advocated [33]. Up to now, the hemodynamic effect of beta-blocking agents on dobutamine infusion has been controversial [34, 35]. In addition, the best fluid replacement therapy, either restrictive or liberal in association with an inotrope, must be the subject of future studies.

Conclusion

Pulmonary artery catheter-guided hemodynamic optimization using dobutamine determines better outcomes, whereas fluids alone increase the incidence of postoperative complications in patients with high risk of perioperative death.

Key messages

  • Preventing perioperative tissue oxygen debt contributes to a better outcome in high-risk surgical patients.

  • The cardiovascular depression was an important component of the hemodynamic response in the perioperative period in this group of patients.

  • In major elective surgery, pulmonary artery catheter-guided hemodynamic optimization using dobutamine and fluids determines better outcomes, whereas fluids alone increase the incidence of postoperative complications in patients with a high risk of perioperative death.

Abbreviations

CI: 

confidence interval

DOI: 

2oxygen delivery index

FiO: 

2fraction of inspired oxygen

ICU: 

intensive care unit

LVSWI: 

left ventricular stroke work index

MAP: 

mean arterial pressure

PaCO: 

2partial pressure of carbon dioxide

PaO: 

2partial pressure of oxygen

PAOP: 

pulmonary artery occlusion pressure

RR: 

relative risk.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Critical Care Medicine, Departments of Internal Medicine, Anesthesiology and Surgery, Medical School – FUNFARME and Hospital de Base

References

  1. Cullinane M, Gray AJ, Hargraves CM, Lansdown M, Martin IC, Schubert M: The 2003 Report of the National Confidential Enquiry into Peri-Operative Deaths. London: NCEPOD; 2003.Google Scholar
  2. Ayala A, Perrin MM, Chaudry IH: Defective macrophage antigen presentation following haemorrhage is associated with the loss of MHC class II (Ia) antigens. Immunology 1990, 70: 33-39.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Stephan RN, Kupper TS, Geha AS, Baue AE, Chaudry IH: Hemorrhage without tissue trauma produces immunosuppression and enhances susceptibility to sepsis. Arch Surg 1987, 122: 62-68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Daly JM, Reynolds J, Sigal RK, Shou J, Liberman MD: Effect of dietary protein and amino acids on immune function. Crit Care Med 1990,18(2 Suppl l):S86-S93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Shoemaker WC, Appel PL, Kram HB: Tissue oxygen debt as a determinant of lethal and nonlethal postoperative organ failure. Crit Care Med 1988, 16: 1117-1120.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Shoemaker WC, Appel PL, Kram HB, Waxman K, Lee TS: Prospective trial of supranormal values of survivors as therapeutic goals in high-risk surgical patients. Chest 1988, 94: 1176-1186.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Boyd O, Grounds M, Bennett D: A randomized clinical trial of the effect of deliberate perioperative increase of oxygen delivery on mortality in high-risk surgical patients. JAMA 1993, 270: 2699-2708. 10.1001/jama.270.22.2699View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Wilson J, Woods I, Fawcett J, Whall R, Dibb W, Morris C, MacManus E: Reducing the risk of major elective surgery: Randomised controlled trial of preoperative optimisation of oxygen delivery. BMJ 1999, 318: 1099-1103.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Takala J, Meier-Hellmann A, Eddleston J, Hustaert P, Sramek U: Effect of dopexamine on outcome after major abdominal surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter study. European Multicenter Study Group on Dopexamine in Major Abdominal Surgery. Crit Care Med 2000, 28: 3417-3423. 10.1097/00003246-200010000-00007View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lobo SM, Salgado PF, Castillo VG, Borim AA, Polachini CA, Palchetti JC, Brienzi SL, de Oliveira GG: Effects of maximizing oxygen delivery on morbidity and mortality in high-risk surgical patients. Crit Care Med 2000, 28: 3396-3404. 10.1097/00003246-200010000-00003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kern JW, Shoemaker WC: Meta-analysis of hemodynamic optimization in high-risk patients. Crit Care Med 2002, 30: 1686-1692. 10.1097/00003246-200208000-00002View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Rosenthal MH: Intraoperative fluid management – what and how much? Chest 1999,115(5 Suppl):106S-112S. 10.1378/chest.115.suppl_2.106SView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Toller WG, Metzler H: Acute perioperative heart failure. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2005, 18: 129-135. 10.1097/01.aco.0000162830.59023.50View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Mythen MG, Webb AR: Perioperative plasma volume expansion reduces the incidence of gut mucosal hypoperfusion during cardiac surgery. Arch Surg 1995, 130: 423-429.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gan TJ, Soppitt A, Maroof M, el-Moalem H, Robertson KM, Moretti E, Dwane P, Glass PS: Goal-directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgery. Anesthesiology 2002, 97: 820-826. 10.1097/00000542-200210000-00012View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Venn R, Steele A, Richardson P, Poloniecki J, Grounds M, Newman P: Randomized controlled trial to investigate influence of the fluid challenge on duration of hospital stay and perioperative morbidity in patients with hip fractures. Br J Anaesth 2002, 88: 65-71. 10.1093/bja/88.1.65View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Sinclair S, James S, Singer M: Intraoperative intravascular volume optimisation and length of hospital stay after repair of proximal femoral fracture: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 1997, 315: 909-912.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. American Heart Association: Guidelines for perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery. Circulation 1996, 93: 1278-1317.Google Scholar
  19. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE: The APACHE II – a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1981, 9: 591-597.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Garner JS, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Horan TC, Hughes JM: CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control 1988, 16: 128-140. 10.1016/0196-6553(88)90053-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference: definitions for sepsis and guidelines of innovative therapies in sepsis Crit Care Med 1992, 20: 864-874.
  22. Ruokonen E, Parviainen I, Uusaro A: Treatment of impaired perfusion in septic shock. Ann Med 2002, 34: 590-597. 10.1080/078538902321117814View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pearse R, Dawson D, Fawcett J, Rhodes A, Grounds RM, Bennett ED: Early goal-directed therapy after major surgery reduces complications and duration of hospital stay. A randomised, controlled trial [ISRCTN38797445]. Crit Care 2005, 9: 687-693. 10.1186/cc3887View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Szabo C, Hasko G, Zingarelli B, Nemeth ZH, Salzman AL, Kvetan V, Pastores SM, Vizi ES: Isoproterenol regulates tumour necrosis factor, interleukin-10, interleukin-6 and nitric oxide production and protects against the development of vascular hyporeactivity in endotoxaemia. Immunology 1997, 90: 95-100. 10.1046/j.1365-2567.1997.00137.xPubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. De Backer D, Creteur J, Dubois MJ, Sakr Y, Koch M, Verdant C, Vincent JL: The effects of dobutamine on microcirculatory alterations in patients with septic shock are independent of its systemic effects. Crit Care Med 2006, 34: 403-408. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000198107.61493.5AView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Duranteau J, Sitbon P, Teboul JL, Vicaut E, Anguel N, Richard C, Samii K: Effects of epinephrine, norepinephrine, or the combination of norepinephrine and dobutamine on gastric mucosa in septic shock. Crit Care Med 1999, 27: 893-900. 10.1097/00003246-199905000-00021View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Swisher SG, Holmes EC, Hunt KK, Gornbein JA, Zinner MJ, McFadden DW: Perioperative blood transfusions and decreased long-term survival in esophageal cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996, 112: 341-348. 10.1016/S0022-5223(96)70260-XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Malone DL, Dunne J, Tracy JK, Putnam AT, Scalea TM, Napolitano LM: Blood transfusion, independent of shock severity, is associated with worse outcome in trauma. J Trauma 2003, 54: 898-905.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lobo DN, Bostock KA, Neal KR, Perkins AC, Rowlands BJ, Allison SP: Effect of salt and water balance on recovery of gastrointestinal function after elective colonic resection: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2002, 359: 1812-1818. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08711-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Brandstrup B, Tonnesen H, Beier-Holgersen R, Hjortso E, Ording H, Lindorff-Larsen K, Rasmussen MS, Lanng C, Wallin L, Iversen LH, et al.: Danish Study Group on Perioperative Fluid Therapy: effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: a randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg 2003, 238: 641-648. 10.1097/01.sla.0000094387.50865.23PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Nisanevich V, Felsenstein I, Almogy G, Weissman C, Einav S, Matot I: Effect of intraoperative fluid management on outcome after intraabdominal surgery. Anesthesiology 2005, 103: 25-32. 10.1097/00000542-200507000-00008View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Poldermans D, Boersma E, Bax JJ, Thomson IR, van de Ven LL, Blankensteijn JD, Baars HF, Yo TI, Trocino G, Vigna C, et al.: The effect of bisoprolol on perioperative mortality and myocardial infarction in high-risk patients undergoing vascular surgery. Dutch Echocardiographic Cardiac Risk Evaluation Applying Stress Echocardiography Study Group. N Engl J Med 1999, 341: 1789-1794. 10.1056/NEJM199912093412402View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Oh YJ, Lee JH, Kim JY, Song JW, Hong YW, Kwak YL: The haemodynamic effects of propranolol and atenolol medication on dobutamine infusion in patients with coronary artery obstructive disease. J Int Med Res 2005, 33: 329-336.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Waagstein F, Malek I, Hjalmarson AC: The use of dobutamine in myocardial infarction for reversal of the cardiodepressive effect of metoprolol. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1978, 5: 515-521.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. De Backer D: Optimal management of the high risk surgical patient: beta stimulation or beta blockade? Crit Care 2005, 9: 645-646. 10.1186/cc3930PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Lobo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.