Open Access

Bench-to-bedside review: Microdialysis in intensive care medicine

Critical Care20048:363

DOI: 10.1186/cc2882

Published: 3 June 2004


Microdialysis is a technique used to measure the concentrations of various compounds in the extracellular fluid of an organ or in a body fluid. It is a form of metabolic monitoring that provides real-time, continuous information on pathophysiological processes in target organs. It was introduced in the early 1970s, mainly to measure concentrations of neurotransmitters in animal experiments and clinical settings. Using commercial equipment it is now possible to conduct analyses at the bedside by collecting interstitial fluid for measurement of carbohydrate and lipid metabolites. Important research has been reported in the field of neurosurgery in recent decades, but use of metabolic monitoring in critical care medicine is not yet routine. The present review provides an overview of findings from clinical studies using microdialysis in critical care medicine, focusing on possible indications for clinical biochemical monitoring. An important message from the review is that sequential and tissue-specific metabolic monitoring, in vivo, is now available.


critical care metabolism microdialysis monitoring


There is not yet any clinically established method for following local biochemical parameters in organs when they are affected by hypoxia or ischemia, or are developing organ failure. In the experimental setting it is possible to follow metabolic parameters such as glucose, lactate, pyruvate and glycerol using microdialysis equipment [1, 2]. In the clinical setting, thus far microdialysis has mostly been used in studies of subcutaneous adipose tissue [3], muscle [4] and human brain [58].

In intensive care medicine, diagnostic and therapeutic decisions are frequently based on measuring blood concentrations of indicator substances, but it is well known that biochemical reactions take place in the tissues. It has therefore been suggested that measurement of tissue chemistry reveals more valuable data than does analysis of systemic parameters in the blood [9]. Furthermore, in the past, detection of tissue concentrations of a substance of interest was hindered by the requirement for tissue harvesting [10], but harvesting is not necessary with microdialysis.

This article reviews the technique of microdialysis and its development from 'bench to bedside' for use in clinical research, major surgical interventions and critical care. We also discuss whether biochemical tissue monitoring has the potential to surpass blood analysis and become the standard technique for certain clinical procedures. Because fundamental research in numerous studies and reviews of the value of biochemical monitoring in the field of neurosurgery have been published, here we focus on the use of microdialysis in general perioperative and intensive care treatment.


Microdialysis was introduced by Ungerstedt and Pycock [11] and was used primarily in brain research, but it is now increasingly being applied to various tissues in experimental studies dealing with critical illness, and has some applications in the clinical setting [1, 2, 9]. In theory, the microdialysis catheter acts like a blood capillary [12]. Thereby, it is proposed that microdialysis provides information regarding events that take place in the tissue before any chemical events are reflected by changes in systemic blood levels of indicator substances [13]. Briefly, for those who are less familiar with the technique, the capillaries and the semipermeable membrane are surrounded by substrates and metabolites in the extracellular fluid of the tissue (Fig. 1). These molecules diffuse across the membrane part of the catheter and equilibrate with the perfusion fluid, which is pumped through the probe at very low rates of flow. Changes in the concentration of a substrate in the surrounding milieu are reflected by subsequent changes in the dialysate [14]. Rather than inserting an instrument into the tissue, microdialysate is extracted and later analyzed in the laboratory or clinically at the patient's bedside.
Figure 1

Principle of microdialysis. The microdialysis probe is inserted into the tissue where substances in the extracellular fluid surround the semipermeable membrane at the tip of the catheter. Following equilibration of the tissue metabolites with the perfusion fluid, the dialysate can be analyzed for concentrations of products of energy metabolism (glucose, lactate, pyruvate) as indicators of hypoxia and ischemia. In addition, interstitial glycerol can be determined, which is a parameter of lipolysis and/or cell membrane damage.

Clinical application of microdialysis was 'catalyzed' by the development of commercially available microdialysis catheters that may be used in humans [9]. Because of modern technical innovations, it is now possible to determine dialysate and tissue concentrations immediately at the bedside during intensive care treatment [15]. The first reported application of microdialysis in humans was a study of interstitial glucose, which was published in 1987 [16]. Since then, microdialysis has been investigated in various human tissues, for example in cancer research [9] and pharmaceutical studies [17, 18], and in clinical research [19]. However, particular interest is currently devoted to perioperative biochemical monitoring in the fields of vascular, gastrointestinal and heart surgery, and postoperative observation.

Clinical applications

Microdialysis in vascular surgery

Several studies dealing with tissue vulnerability during ischemia and reperfusion have been reported [20, 21]. Previous studies on the consequences of ischemia in skeletal muscle usually involved venous blood sampling or tissue biopsies, but microdialysis has the advantage that metabolite levels can be monitored directly in the interstitial fluid of the tissue, even when blood flow is restricted. Lundberg and coworkers [22] used microdialysis to grade the severity of peripheral vessel disease. Responses of interstitial muscle concentrations of lactate and the lactate–pyruvate ratio to blood flow reduction were variable, whereas glucose concentration subsequently fell. Using microdialysis, Metzsch and coworkers [23] investigated metabolic changes during open and endovascular aortic surgery, and found that stent procedures had a lesser impact on regional tissue metabolism over 24 hours than did open aortic procedures.

In the field of orthopedic surgery, Korth and coworkers [24] demonstrated that interstitial concentrations of glucose, lactate, and hypoxanthine – indicators of tissue ischemia – change more markedly after exsanguination of the extremity than after circulatory occlusion alone. The energy status in muscle tissue was immediately visible after induction of ischemia, when glucose levels decreased and the extracellular concentrations of lactate and hypoxanthine increased.

Our study group clinically monitored patients during abdominal aortic surgery using microdialysis of the subcutaneous tissue. We found the glucose–lactate ratio to be the most sensitive marker for detection of ischemic events (Fig. 2[25]); in another study we focused on the lacate–pyruvate ratio and interstitial glycerol [26].
Figure 2

Interstitial glucose/lactate ratio in the ischemic and nonischemic region during abdominal aortic surgery. *P < 0.05.

Monitoring in the neonatal intensive care unit

Microdialysis in the neonatal intensive care unit is a new approach to continuous monitoring of newborn patients who are at at risk from hypoglycemia (a commonly encountered problem in neonatal intensive care). The objective of the study conducted Baumeister and coworkers [27] was to evaluate subcutaneous microdialysis in long-term glucose monitoring in the neonatal intensive care unit. By using subcutaneous microdialysis, blood draws and painful stress resulting from diagnostic blood sampling in high-risk neonates were reduced. Subcutaneous microdialysis has been used continuously for up to 4 days in neonates during intensive care, and for 3 and 7 days in adult insulin-dependent diabetic patients [19]. In their clinical study, Baumeister and coworkers [27] continued metabolic monitoring for 4–16 days and found a close correlation (r ~ 0.97) between blood and interstitial glucose levels.

Monitoring the gastrointestinal tract in the intensive care unit

Ensuring adequacy of visceral circulation is of high priority in critical illness. However, no clinical instrument has yet been developed to continuously monitor biochemical and circulatory parameters in this compartment [28, 29]. Decrease in intestinal blood flow or derangement of visceral oxygen supply is well known to induce local and systemic inflammation. This could subsequently be responsible for multiple organ dysfunction and/or failure [30]. Many investigators have attempted measure adequacy of splanchnic circulation either by measuring splanchnic blood flow in global splanchnic blood flow or local tissue perfusion or by evaluating metabolism in one region of the gastrointestinal tissue [28].

However, Tenhunen and coworkers have forwarded a theory, supported by several studies conducted in various experimental and clinical settings [3136], that changes in tissue perfusion and metabolism in response to different drug interventions vary. That research group is by far the most experienced with respect to experimental biochemical monitoring of the gastrointestinal tract in the critical care setting. They identified intestinal histamine release in a selective regional intestinal ischemia–reperfusion model, not during ischemia but only during the reperfusion phase [33].

Following short-term endotoxin challenge, Oldner and coworkers [37] observed early increases in microdialysate lactate and hypoxanthine in ileum, as opposed to systemically detectable changes. However, insertion of a microdialysis probe into the intestinal wall is not feasible for clinical application. Subsequently, intraluminal [34] and intraperitoneal [38] applications were evaluated in experimental ischemia and hypoxia. Using microdialysis, Ungerstedt and colleagues [39] investigated local and regional gastrointestinal ischemia caused by vascular occlusion. Also in the setting of gastrointestinal ischemia caused by vascular occlusion, Jansson and coworkers [40] were the first to apply intraperitoneal microdialysis in clinical pilot studies of patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Intraperitoneal microdialysis appears to represent a very promising clinical tool for continuous monitoring of metabolic status in visceral tissues. It is minimally invasive; for example, the probe may placed be left in situ after laparotomy.

Liver monitoring in the intensive care unit

Despite improvements in liver preservation and surgery, a signficant incidence of graft dysfunction following liver transplantation persists. Microdialysis offers the possibility to monitor the liver during and after transplantation. Nowak and coworkers, who are pioneers in this field, investigated this application both experimentally [41] and clinically [42]. In their studies they investigated ischemia–reperfusion injury and post-transplant vascular complications, with apparent impact on hepatic metabolism, using microdialysis. They characterized the course of normalization in biochemical markers during the 72-hour postoperative period following liver transplantation. Nowak and coworkers concluded that the procedure is easy to perform and safe for the patient. They stated that the detection of specific pathologic changes (e.g. arterial and portal vein thrombosis, early graft rejection) might be possible using microdialysis, and that this should be addressed in further studies.

Monitoring sepsis

Increasing interest has been devoted to metabolic changes that occur in the tissue during sepsis and endotoxemia. In their animal experiments, Tenhunen and coworkers [36] induced a biphasic endotoxic shock lasting 12 hours and measured regional blood flows. Endotoxin shock per se had heterogeneous effects on tissue perfusion, and it was observed that blood flow changes did not correlate with metabolic events. We performed endotoxin [43] and monophosphoryl-lipid A [44] vaccination before induction of endotoxemia in animal experiments. Despite nonsignificant differences in hemodynamic parameters, lower interstitial lactate and glycerol accumulation (Fig. 3) were clearly associated with prolonged survival.
Figure 3

Interstitial muscle concentrations of lactate (a) and glycerol (b) during continuous endotoxin infusion with (black) or without (white) pretreatment with monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL). *P < 0.05, between groups; #P < 0.05, versus baseline (only assessed at 150 and 300 min).

Stjernstrom and coworkers [15] were the first to report on the use of microdialysis in sepsis; they described case reports of microdialysis monitoring in patients with septic shock. Clinically, Martinez and coworkers [45] evaluated adipose tissue metabolism in severely ill patients. The aim of the latter investigation was to study whole body substrate utilization and adipose tissue lactate and glycerol release in healthy human volunteers and in two groups of critically ill patients: one group of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock and another with circulatory failure after cardiac surgery. Differences in tissue metabolic response were found between sepsis/septic shock and cardiac failure patients using microdialysis. The observations summarized above, along with Fink's theory of 'cytopathic hypoxia' [46] in septic states, add weight to a recommendation to introduce biochemical tissue monitoring into critical care practice.

Monitoring pharmacological concentrations

Achievement of appropriate concentrations of antibiotics at target sites is associated with clinical outcome [47] and therefore is of particular importance. Recent data, however, strongly suggest that concentrations of antibiotics reached in the interstitium of soft tissues might be ineffective in critically ill patients, despite achievement of adequate plasma concentrations [18]. Fundamental experimental research in the field of drug monitoring using microdialysis has been reported [48]; this was recently reviewed by Joukhadar and coworkers [17].

Monitoring myocardial metabolism

Several experimental approaches such as biochemical analysis of coronary sinus blood, myocardial biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging have been taken in order to describe the metabolic changes that occur during and after cardiopulmonary bypass [49]. With the exception of septic conditions [46], the interstitial concentration of lactate has been shown to be closely related to variations in tissue perfusion [1] and may thus be used as a surrogate marker of myocardial ischemia. Following experimental evaluation by Kennergren and coworkers [49], Habicht and colleagues [50] were the first to introduce this concept into the clinic by inserting microdialysis probes into the interventricular septum of the human heart. Kennergren and colleagues [51] then focused on changes in troponin T and aspartate transferase in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and valve surgery.

We investigated the course of myocardial metabolism in patients undergoing standard coronary artery bypass grafting [52]. In contrast to blood levels, myocardial lactate–pyruvate ratio exhibited marked changes during the period of observation; pyruvate was found to be a promising indicator of tissue reperfusion. In a recent study of myocardial microdialysis (unpublished data), we categorized patients by lactate concentration at baseline into a high lactate group and a low lactate group. We found an association between increased myocardial lactate levels – as determined by microdialysis – and reduced myocardial performance with difficult weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass during coronary artery bypass grafting. This suggests that myocardial microdialysis may be a useful adjunct for stratifying treatment in these interventions (unpublished data). Microdialysis may reveal promising diagnostic and therapeutic options by permitting analysis of the effects of different treatment strategies on myocardial metabolism (i.e. the 'target tissue' of therapeutic interventions) in cardiac surgical patients.


Microdialysis has been introduced into several sectors of critical care medicine. The precise role and cost-effectiveness of microdialysis, in comparison with well established technologies, in developing strategies to improve the organ function in intensive care remain to be determined. However, even in the well established field of neurosurgery, the clinical use microdialysis has not yet been found to improve outcome. Current data support a recommendation to introduce this new technique to evaluate the adequacy of regional tissue metabolism; it may even permit monitoring of the effects of therapeutic interventions. Further studies of various approaches are needed to conclude which seems clinically most feasible, which is sufficiently non-invasive, and which supplies the clinician with the most physiologically relevant information. Whether clinicians will be able to monitor their 'tissues of interest' directly, with microdialysis playing a key role, will be determined by the results of further evaluation.


Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Anaesthesiology, Medical University of Luebeck


  1. Ungerstedt U: Microdialysis: principles and applications for studies in animals and man. J Intern Med. 1991, 230: 365-373.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ungerstedt U: Microdialysis: a new technique for monitoring local tissue events in the clinic. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1997, 110: 123-View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Lutgers HL, Hullegie LM, Hoogenberg K, Sluiter WJ, Dullaart RP, Wientjes KJ, Schoonen AJ: Microdialysis measurement of glucose in subcutaneous adipose tissue up to three weeks in type 1 diabetic patients. Neth J Med. 2000, 57: 7-12. 10.1016/S0300-2977(00)00022-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. MacLean DA, Sinoway LI, Leuenberger U: Systemic hypoxia elevates skeletal muscle interstitial adenosine levels in humans. Circulation. 1998, 98: 1990-1992.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Peerdeman SM, Girbes AR, Polderman KH, Vandertop WP: Changes in cerebral interstitial glycerol concentration in head-injured patients; correlation with secondary events. Intensive Care Med. 2003, 29: 1825-1828. 10.1007/s00134-003-1850-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hutchinson PJ, O'Connell MT, al-Rawi PG, Kett-White R, Gupta AK, Kirkpatrick PJ, Pickard JD: Clinical cerebral microdialysis: determining the true extracellular concentration. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2002, 81: 359-362.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Sarrafzadeh AS, Sakowitz OW, Lanksch WR, Unterberg AW: Time course of various interstitial metabolites following sub-arachnoid hemorrhage studied by on-line microdialysis. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2001, 77: 145-147.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hillered L, Persson L: Microdialysis for neurochemical monitoring of the human brain. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2003, 37: 13-17. 10.1080/14017430310006974.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Muller M: Science, medicine, and the future: microdialysis. BMJ. 2002, 324: 588-591. 10.1136/bmj.324.7337.588.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Crinnion JN, Homer-Vanniasinkam S, Gough MJ: Skeletal muscle reperfusion injury: pathophysiology and clinical considerations. Cardiovasc Surg. 1993, 1: 317-324.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ungerstedt U, Pycock C: Functional correlates of dopamine neurotransmission. Bull Schweiz Akad Med Wiss. 1974, 30: 44-55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Arner P: Techniques for the measurement of white adipose tissue metabolism: a practical guide. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1995, 19: 435-442.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Connelly CA: Microdialysis update: optimizing the advantages. J Physiol. 1999, 514: 303-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lonnroth P, Smith U: Microdialysis: a novel technique for clinical investigations. J Intern Med. 1990, 227: 295-300.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Stjernstrom H, Karlsson T, Ungerstedt U, Hillered L: Chemical monitoring of intensive care patients using intravenous microdialysis. Intensive Care Med. 1993, 19: 423-428.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lonnroth P, Jansson PA, Smith U: A microdialysis method allowing characterization of intercellular water space in humans. Am J Physiol. 1987, 253: E228-E231.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Joukhadar C, Derendorf H, Muller M: Microdialysis. A novel tool for clinical studies of anti-infective agents. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2001, 57: 211-219. 10.1007/s002280100301.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Joukhadar C, Frossard M, Mayer BX, Brunner M, Klein N, Siostrzonek P, Eichler HG, Muller M: Impaired target site penetration of beta-lactams may account for therapeutic failure in patients with septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2001, 29: 385-391. 10.1097/00003246-200102000-00030.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Bolinder J, Hagstrom-Toft E, Ungerstedt U, Arner P: Self-monitoring of blood glucose in type I diabetic patients: comparison with continuous microdialysis measurements of glucose in subcutaneous adipose tissue during ordinary life conditions. Diabetes Care. 1997, 20: 64-70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Homer-Vanniasinkam S, Crinnion JN, Gough MJ: Post-ischaemic organ dysfunction: a review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1997, 14: 195-203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kerrigan CL, Stotland MA: Ischemia reperfusion injury: a review. Microsurgery. 1993, 14: 165-175.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lundberg G, Wahlberg E, Swedenborg J, Sundberg CJ, Ungerstedt U, Olofsson P: Continuous assessment of local metabolism by microdialysis in critical limb ischaemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg . 2000, 19: 605-613. 10.1053/ejvs.1999.1088.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Metzsch C, Lundberg J, Norgren L: Regional tissue metabolism during open or endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2001, 21: 320-325. 10.1053/ejvs.2001.1326.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Korth U, Merkel G, Fernandez FF, Jandewerth O, Dogan G, Koch T, van Ackern K, Weichel O, Klein J: Tourniquet-induced changes of energy metabolism in human skeletal muscle monitored by microdialysis. Anesthesiology. 2000, 93: 1407-1412. 10.1097/00000542-200012000-00011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Klaus S, Staubach KH, Eichler W, Gliemroth J, Heringlake M, Schmucker P, Bahlmann L: Clinical biochemical tissue monitoring during ischaemia and reperfusion in major vascular surgery. Ann Clin Biochem. 2003, 40: 289-291. 10.1258/000456303321610646.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Bahlmann L, Wagner K, Heringlake M, Wirtz C, Futterer T, Schmucker P, Klaus S: Subcutaneous microdialysis for metabolic monitoring in abdominal aortic surgery. J Clin Monit Comput. 2002, 17: 309-312. 10.1023/A:1021284608837.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Baumeister FA, Rolinski B, Busch R, Emmrich P: Glucose monitoring with long-term subcutaneous microdialysis in neonates. Pediatrics. 2001, 108: 1187-1192.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Levy B, Gawalkiewicz P, Vallet B, Briancon S, Nace L, Bollaert PE: Gastric capnometry with air-automated tonometry predicts outcome in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2003, 31: 474-480. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000050445.48656.28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hiltebrand LB, Krejci V, Banic A, Erni D, Wheatley AM, Sigurdsson GH: Dynamic study of the distribution of microcirculatory blood flow in multiple splanchnic organs in septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2000, 28: 3233-3241. 10.1097/00003246-200009000-00019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Thornton FJ, Barbul A: Healing in the gastrointestinal tract. Surg Clin North Am. 1997, 77: 549-573.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Martikainen TJ, Tenhunen JJ, Uusaro A, Ruokonen E: The effects of vasopressin on systemic and splanchnic hemodynamics and metabolism in endotoxin shock. Anesth Analg. 2003, 97: 1756-1763.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Rixen D, Raum M, Holzgraefe B, Schafer U, Hess S, Tenhunen J, Tuomisto L, Neugebauer EA: Local lactate and histamine changes in small bowel circulation measured by microdialysis in pig hemorrhagic shock. Shock. 2002, 18: 355-359. 10.1097/00024382-200210000-00011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Tenhunen JJ, Kosunen H, Juvonen P, Heino A, Koski EM, Merasto ME, Takala J, Alhava E, Tuomisto L: Intestinal mucosal microdialysis: histamine release in splanchnic ischemia/reperfusion injury in piglets. Inflamm Res. 1996, Suppl 1: S52-S53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Tenhunen JJ, Kosunen H, Alhava E, Tuomisto L, Takala JA: Intestinal luminal microdialysis: a new approach to assess gut mucosal ischemia. Anesthesiology. 1999, 91: 1807-1815. 10.1097/00000542-199912000-00035.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Tenhunen JJ, Jakob SM, Takala JA: Gut luminal lactate release during gradual intestinal ischemia. Intensive Care Med. 2001, 27: 1916-1922. 10.1007/s00134-001-1145-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Tenhunen JJ, Uusaro A, Karja V, Oksala N, Jakob SM, Ruokonen E: Apparent heterogeneity of regional blood flow and metabolic changes within splanchnic tissues during experimental endotoxin shock. Anesth Analg. 2003, 97: 555-563.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Oldner A, Goiny M, Ungerstedt U, Sollevi A: Splanchnic homeostasis during endotoxin challenge in the pig as assessed by microdialysis and tonometry. Shock. 1996, 6: 188-193.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Klaus S, Heringlake M, Gliemroth J, Bruch HP, Bahlmann L: Intraperitoneal microdialysis for detection of splanchnic metabolic disorders. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2002, 387: 276-280. 10.1007/s00423-002-0320-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Ungerstedt J, Nowak G, Ericzon BG, Ungerstedt U: Intraperitoneal microdialysis (IPM): a new technique for monitoring intestinal ischemia studied in a porcine model. Shock. 2003, 20: 91-96. 10.1097/01.shk.0000070904.21762.36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Jansson K, Ungerstedt J, Jonsson T, Redler B, Andersson M, Ungerstedt U, Norgren L: Human intraperitoneal microdialysis: increased lactate/pyruvate ratio suggests early visceral ischaemia. A pilot study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2003, 38: 1007-1011. 10.1080/00365520310004065.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Nowak G, Ungerstedt J, Wernerman J, Ungerstedt U, Ericzon BG: Metabolic changes in the liver graft monitored continuously with microdialysis during liver transplantation in a pig model. Liver Transpl. 2002, 8: 424-432. 10.1053/jlts.2002.32943.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Nowak G, Ungerstedt J, Wernerman J, Ungerstedt U, Ericzon BG: Clinical experience in continuous graft monitoring with microdialysis early after liver transplantation. Br J Surg. 2002, 89: 1169-1175. 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02187.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Klaus S, Heringlake M, Block K, Nolde J, Staubach K, Bahlmann L: Metabolic changes detected by microdialysis during endotoxin shock and after endotoxin preconditioning. Intensive Care Med. 2003, 29: 634-641.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Klaus S, Staubach KH, Heringlake M, Gliemroth J, Schmucker P, Bahlmann L: Tissue metabolism during endotoxin shock after pretreatment with monophosphoryl lipid A. Cardiovasc Res. 2003, 59: 105-112. 10.1016/S0008-6363(03)00347-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Martinez A, Chiolero R, Bollman M, Revelly JP, Berger M, Cayeux C, Tappy L: Assessment of adipose tissue metabolism by means of subcutaneous microdialysis in patients with sepsis or circulatory failure. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2003, 23: 286-292. 10.1046/j.1475-097X.2003.00512.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Fink MP: Bench-to-bedside review: Cytopathic hypoxia. Crit Care. 2002, 6: 491-499. 10.1186/cc1824.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Hyatt JM, McKinnon PS, Zimmer GS, Schentag JJ: The importance of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic surrogate markers to outcome. Focus on antibacterial agents. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1995, 28: 143-160.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Muller M: Microdialysis in clinical drug delivery studies. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2000, 45: 255-269. 10.1016/S0169-409X(00)00113-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Kennergren C, Nystrom B, Nystrom U, Berglin E, Larsson G, Mantovani V, Lonnroth P, Hamberger A: In situ detection of myocardial infarction in pig by measurements of aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) activity in the interstitial fluid. Scand Cardiovasc J. 1997, 31: 343-349.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Habicht JM, Wolff T, Langemann H, Stulz P: Intraoperative and postoperative microdialysis measurement of the human heart: feasibility and initial results in German]. Swiss Surg. 1998, Suppl 2: 26-30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Kennergren C, Mantovani V, Lonnroth P, Nystrom B, Berglin E, Hamberger A: Extracellular amino acids as markers of myocardial ischemia during cardioplegic heart arrest. Cardiology. 1999, 91: 31-40. 10.1159/000006874.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Bahlmann L, Misfeld M, Klaus S, Leptien A, Heringlake M, Schmucker P, Sievers HH, Ungerstedt U, Kraatz EG: Myocardial redox state during coronary artery bypass grafting assessed with microdialysis. Intensive Care Med. 2004, 30: 889-894. 10.1007/s00134-004-2199-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© BioMed Central Ltd 2004