Open Access

Immune derangement occurs in patients with H7N9 avian influenza

  • Wei Wu1,
  • Yu Shi1,
  • Hainv Gao1,
  • Weifeng Liang1,
  • Jifang Sheng1 and
  • Lanjuan Li1Email author
Contributed equally
Critical Care201418:R43

DOI: 10.1186/cc13788

Received: 18 November 2013

Accepted: 20 February 2014

Published: 24 March 2014



Currently, little is known about the immunological characteristics of patients with avian influenza A (H7N9) virus infection.


The numbers and percentages of peripheral blood immune cells were measured in 27 patients with laboratory-confirmed H7N9 virus infection and 30 healthy controls (HCs). The functional phenotypes of T cells and monocytes, as well as serum cytokine levels, were analyzed by flow cytometry.


There were 19 patients (70.4%) with acute respiratory distress syndrome, 13 (48.1%) with secondary respiratory infection, 20 (74%) with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS; defined as having at least two concurrent SIRS components), 18 (66.7%) with lymphocytopenia and 11 (40.7%) with reduced numbers of monocytes. In comparison with levels in the HCs, the levels of serum interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-8 and IL-10 and the percentages of CD38+ or Tim-3+ T cells were significantly increased. However, the percentages of human leukocyte antigen-DR + and Tim-3+ monocytes were significantly decreased in patients compared with HCs.


Patients with avian H7N9 virus infection display profound SIRS concomitantly with an anti-inflammatory response, which may be associated with the rapid progression of and high mortality associated with this novel viral disease.


Recently in China, an outbreak of influenza occurred that was caused by a novel influenza A (H7N9) viral infection of avian origin. According to published reports, patients with H7N9 virus infection present with rapid, progressive pneumonia commonly leading to the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), respiratory failure and even multiorgan dysfunction syndrome [1]. More importantly, patients with H7N9 virus–mediated influenza have a high mortality rate [2]. Previous studies have revealed the clinical characteristics [1], epidemiology [35] and virology [6, 7], laboratory diagnosis, and treatment of patients with H7N9 virus infection [8, 9]. However, little is known about the impact of H7N9 virus infection on the immune system.

In this paper, we describe the cytokine profiles and functional phenotypes of immunocompetent cells in 27 patients with H7N9 virus–mediated influenza and 30 healthy controls (HCs). We determined the functional phenotypes of immunocompetent cells and serum cytokine profiles of the participants. We describe the cytokine profiles and functional phenotypes of immunocompetent cells in 27 patients.

Materials and methods


We recruited 27 patients with H7N9 virus–mediated influenza and 30 healthy controls (HCs). The patients with avian influenza were recruited from the Inpatient Service at The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine between 10 and 22 April 2013. Individual patients with H7N9 were diagnosed on the basis of clinical symptoms and laboratory-confirmed H7N9 virus infection. Patients with ARDS were diagnosed according to standard criteria [10]. Thirty age- and gender-matched HCs were recruited at the Physical Examination Center of the hospital during the same period. The mean age of the HCs was 57 ± 12 years, and 56.7% of them were male (17 participants). The exclusion criteria were (1) coinfection with hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) or HIV; (2) the presence of a common autoimmune disease and tumor; and/or (3) a recent history of chemotherapy, radiotherapy or use of immunosuppressants. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant. The experimental protocol was established in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine. The patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Demographic, epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of 27 patients with H7N9 virus infection a



Age (years)

62 ± 14

Male, n (%)

16 (59.3)

Smoker, n (%)

8 (29.6)

Exposure to live poultry, n (%)

16 (59.3)

Underlying conditions, n (%)



15 (55.6)


13 (48.1)

 Coronary heart disease

2 (7.4)

 Diabetes mellitus

3 (11.1)

 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

1 (3.7)


7 (25.9)

Days between disease onset and admission

1.0 (0.5 to 19.0)

White blood cell count (109/L)

5.1 ± 3.0

Hemoglobin (g/dl)

123 ± 24

Platelet count (109/L)

132 ± 46

Alanine aminotransferase (U/L) (n = 26)

36 (12 to 262)

Creatinine (μmol/L)

57 (25 to 266)

Potassium (mmol/L)

4.37 ± 0.48

Sodium (mmol/L)

139 ± 4

International normalized ratio

1.08 ± 0.093

D-dimer (μg/L) (n = 26)

2,790 (120 to 42,920)

PaO2:FiO2 ratio

143.26 ± 58.38

Chest radiological abnormalities


 Involvement of both lungs (n = 26)

18 (69.2)

 Ground-glass opacities (n = 21)

2 (8.7)

 Pulmonary consolidation

25 (92.6)

 APACHE II score

22.26 ± 7.70



 Acute respiratory distress syndrome, n (%)

19 (70.4)

 Secondary infection, n (%)

13 (48.1)

 Liver damage, n (%) (n = 26)

12 (44.4)

 Shock, n (%)

6 (22.2)

 Acute renal injury, n (%)

1 (3.7)

 Antiviral therapy with oseltamivir, n (%)

27 (100)

 Glucocorticoid therapy, n (%)

10 (37.0)

 Mechanical ventilation, n (%)

13 (48.1)

 Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, n (%)

9 (33.3)

a APACHE II, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II; PaO2: FiO2, ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen.

Continuous data were expressed as mean ± SD or median (range), and categorical data were represented as number (percentage).

Laboratory examination of H7N9 virus patients

Sputum samples were collected from individual patients immediately after hospitalization, and the presence of H7N9 virus in the collected sputum samples was determined by real-time RT-PCR as previously described [8]. Briefly, the presence of the M, H7 and N9 genes of the H7N9 virus was detected by TaqMan real-time RT-PCR assays (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using specific primers. The sequences of primers and probes used were as follows: M forward: 5′-GAGTGGCTAAAGACAAGACCAATC-3′), M reverse: 5′-TTGGACAAAGCGTCTACGC-3′ and M probe: 6-carboxyfluorescein (6-FAM)-TCACCGTGCCCAGTGAGCGAG-black hole quencher 1 (BHQ1); H7 forward: AGAGTCATTRCARAATAGAATACAGAT, H7 reverse: CACYGCATGTTTCCATTCTT and H7 probe: 6-FAM-AAACATGATGCCCCGAAGCTAAAC-BHQ1; and N9 forward: GTTCTATGCTCTCAGCCAAGG, N9 reverse: CTTGACCACCCAATGCATTC and N9 probe: hexachlorofluorescein-TAAGCTRGCCACTATCATCACCRCC-BHQ1. The sensitivity of these RT-PCR assays was approximately 100 copies/ml RNA.

Flow cytometry

Venous blood samples were collected from individual patients immediately after hospitalization and from HCs when they visited the hospital. To characterize the frequency of T, natural killer (NK) and B cells, individual blood samples (0.5 ml) were stained with the following antibodies: phycoerythrin (PE) cyanine 5–conjugated (Pcy5) anti-CD3, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-CD4, PE-conjugated anti-CD8 (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), PE-conjugated anti-CD16/anti-CD56 or FITC-conjugated anti-CD19 (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). Furthermore, to characterize T-cell immunoglobulin mucin 3–positive (Tim-3+) or CD38+ T cells, blood samples were stained with the following antibodies: Pcy5-conjugated anti-CD3, FITC-conjugated anti-CD4, FITC-conjugated anti-CD8, PE-conjugated anti-Tim-3 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) or PE-conjugated anti-CD38 (Beckman Coulter). In addition, to characterize Tim-3+ and HLA-DR + monocytes, whole-blood samples were stained with antibodies against FITC-conjugated anti-CD14 and allophycocyanin-conjugated anti-Tim-3 (R&D Systems) or PE antibodies against major histocompatibility complex class II cell surface receptor encoded by the human leukocyte antigen (anti-HLA-DR) (BD Biosciences). The isotype-matched immunoglobulins were used as controls. The frequency of different types of immunocompetent cells was characterized by flow cytometry, and at least 1 × 105 events were analyzed using an FC500 MPL flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter) or an Accuri C6 cytometer (BD Biosciences).

Measurement of serum cytokines

Individual serum samples were obtained from patients immediately after hospitalization and from HCs when they visited the hospital. The concentrations of serum interferon γ (IFN-γ), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), TNF-β, interleukin 1β (IL-1β), IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10 and IL-12P70 in individual participants were determined by cytometric bead array (CBA) using a FlowCytomix Simplex Kit (Bender MedSystems/eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions, which were described previously [11]. The concentrations of individual serum cytokines were determined using standard curves established with the individual recombinant cytokines provided. The limitation of detection was 1.6 pg/ml for IFN-γ, 3.2 pg/ml for TNF-α, 2.4 pg/ml for TNF-β, 4.2 pg/ml for IL-1β, 16.4 pg/ml for IL-2, 20.8 pg/ml for IL-4, 1.6 pg/ml for IL-5, 1.2 pg/ml for IL-6, 0.5 pg/ml for IL-8, 1.9 pg/ml for IL-10 and 1.5 pg/ml for IL-12P70.

Statistical analysis

Continuous data are expressed as mean ± SD or median (range), and categorical data are given as percentages. Comparison of the data between the two groups was analyzed by Student’s t-test, Mann–Whitney U nonparametric test and χ2 test using SPSS 16.0 for Windows software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). A two-sided P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


Demographic, epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the study population

A total of 27 patients with confirmed avian-origin influenza A (H7N9) virus infection and 30 HCs were recruited for participation in this study. Their demographic and clinical characteristics are presented in Table 1. There were no significant differences between the patients and HCs in our sample population with regard to age or gender. After hospital admission, sputum samples were collected from individual patients and subjected to characterization of H7N9 virus genes. The sputum samples from all patients were positive for the M, H7 and N9 genes as determined by RT-PCR, confirming that all the patients had H7N9 avian-origin influenza virus infection. Of the 27 patients, 8 (29.6%) were smokers and 16 (59.3%) had a definitive history of poultry exposure. Furthermore, 55.6% of the patients had preexisting chronic diseases, such as hypertension.

Chest radiographs showed that all patients displayed significant changes, and 92.6% of them had bilateral consolidation in the lungs. Most patients were in critical condition, with an average Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score of 22.26 ± 7.70, 70.4% developed ARDS and 48.1% had secondary infections in the respiratory tract. In addition, many patients developed severe complications, including liver damage (44.4%), renal injury (3.7%) and shock (22.2%). All patients were given oral antiviral therapy with oseltamivir, and 10 (37.0%) received glucocorticoid treatment. Approximately one-half of the patients (13 (48.1%) of 27) required mechanical ventilation, and 9 of them received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Patients with H7N9 avian influenza developed systemic inflammatory response syndrome at admission

Many patients with clinical presentation of H7N9 avian influenza developed systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)–related clinical symptoms and signs, such as abnormalities in body temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate and leukocyte count [12], suggesting that a hyperactivated inflammatory response may play a pivotal role in disease progression. We found that 70% patients had at least two concurrent SIRS components. In addition, 92.6% of patients had increased levels of serum C-reactive protein, 33.3% had elevated levels of serum procalcitonin and 77.8% had abnormally high erythrocyte sedimentation rates (Table 2).
Table 2

Systemic inflammatory response syndrome components and clinical inflammatory markers in 27 patients with H7N9 virus infection a



Body temperature <36°C or >38°C, n (%)

24 (88.9)

Heart rate >90 beats/min, n (%)

7 (25.9)

Respiratory rate >20 breaths/min or PaCO2 < 32 mmHg, n (%)

13 (48.1)

WBC count <4 × 109/L or >12 × 109/L, n (%)

13 (48.1)

Maximum two concurrent components, n (%)

11 (40.7)

Maximum three concurrent components, n (%)

7 (25.9)

Maximum four concurrent components, n (%)

2 (7.4)

C-reactive protein >10 mg/dl, n (%)

25 (92.6)

Erythrocyte sedimentation rate >20 mm/h (n = 18)

14 (77.8)

Procalcitonin >0.5 ng/ml, n/N (%) (N = 24)

8 (33.3)

aPaCO2, partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide; WBC, white blood cell.

Data were represented as number (percentage).

Significantly higher levels of serum cytokines in patients with H7N9 avian influenza

SIRS is a consequence of cytokine storm, so we evaluated the levels of serum cytokines by CBA in HCs and in the patients with H7N9 influenza at the time of admission. We detected IL-2, IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10, but we did not detect IFN-γ, TNF-α, TNF-β, IL-1β, IL-4, IL-5 or IL-12p70. We found that the levels of serum IL-6 (P = 0.0098), IL-8 (P = 0.0010) and IL-10 (P = 0.015) in the patients were significantly higher than those in the HCs (Figure 1). However, there was no significant difference in the levels of serum IL-2 between these two groups (P = 0.19).
Figure 1

Levels of circulating cytokines in patients with H7N9 avian influenza. Serum samples were prepared from 10 patients and 10 healthy controls. We carried out cytometric bead arrays to measure the concentrations of serum interleukin 1β (IL-1β), IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p70, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), TNF-β and interferon γ (IFN-γ) in individual samples. Data shown are the mean values of individual cytokines in each participant from two separate experiments, which we analyzed by Mann–Whitney U test. Under our experimental conditions, we found no detectable levels of serum IL-1β, IL-4, IL-5, IL-12p70, TNF-α, TNF-β or IFN-γ in these participants (data not shown). Error bars were shown in each column.

Alteration in number of peripheral blood immunocompetent cells in patients with H7N9 avian influenza

Next, we examined the numbers of peripheral blood immunocompetent cells. We found that 66.7% of patients developed lymphocytopenia (lymphocytes <0.8 × 109/L) and 40.7% had abnormally low monocyte counts (monocytes <0.12 × 109/L). However, only 25.9% of patients had neutropenia (neutrophils <2.0 × 109/L). Further flow cytometric analysis indicated that the percentages of CD3+ T cells (58.88 ± 16.34% vs. 67.22 ± 9.22%; P = 0.020) and CD8+ T cells (20.18 ± 8.58% vs. 24.19 ± 6.06%; P = 0.045) were significantly lower in the patients than in the HCs. In addition, we found no significant differences in the frequency of peripheral blood CD3 + CD4+ T cells and CD3 - CD56+ NK cells between the patients and the HCs (37.46 ± 13.50% vs. 38.61 ± 8.84%; P = 0.70 for CD4+ T cells; and 15.10 ± 11.00% vs. 19.73 ± 9.55%; P = 0.095 for NK cells) (Table 3).
Table 3

Comparison of counts and percentages of lymphocytes and lymphocyte subsets between patients with H7N9 virus infection and healthy controls a


Patients (n = 27)

Healthy controls (n = 30)


Neutrophils <2.0 × 109/L, n (%)

7 (25.9)


Monocytes <0.12 × 109/L, n (%)

10 (40.7)


Lymphocytes <0.8 × 109/L, n (%)

18 (66.7)


CD3+ T cells (%)

58.88 ± 16.34

67.22 ± 9.22


CD4+ T cells (%)

37.46 ± 13.50

38.61 ± 8.84


CD8+ T cells (%)

20.18 ± 8.58

24.19 ± 6.06


Natural killer cells (%)

15.10 ± 11.00

19.73 ± 9.55


aStatistical analysis was performed by Student’s t-test.

Continuous data were expressed as mean ± SD and categorical data were represented as number (percentage).

CD38 is a marker of T-cell activation, and Tim-3 is a surface marker of T-cell exhaustion [13]. Further characterization of functional T cells revealed that the percentages of peripheral blood CD38 + CD4+ and CD38 + CD8+ T cells in the patients were significantly higher than those in the HCs (P = 0.0068 and P < 0.001, respectively) (Figure 2). Concomitantly, the percentages of peripheral blood Tim-3 + CD4+ and Tim-3 + CD8+ T cells in the patients were significantly higher than those in the HCs (P < 0.001 for both).
Figure 2

Flow cytometric analysis of the frequency of CD38+ and Tim-3+ T cells. Peripheral whole blood was collected from 18 patients and 12 healthy controls (HC). Blood samples were stained with the fluorescent antibodies anti-CD3, anti-CD4/CD8 and anti-CD38 or anti-Tim-3 and were measured for the percentages of CD38+ and Tim-3+ T cells. Data are presented as flowcharts and expressed as the means of individual participants. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to analyze the differences between groups. (A) Representative flowcharts. FSC Lin, forward scatter, linear scale; SSC Lin, side scatter, linear scale. (B) Quantitative analysis of the percentages of CD38+ and Tim-3+ T cells. The horizontal lines indicate the median values for each group. FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; Tim-3, T-cell immunoglobulin mucin 3.

We next assessed the functional phenotypes of peripheral blood monocytes and found that the percentages of HLA-DR + CD14+ and Tim-3 + CD14+ monocytes in total CD14+ cells in patients were significantly lower than those in the HCs (P = 0.043 and P = 0.0029, respectively) (Figure 3). Collectively, these data suggest that patients with H7N9 avian influenza had immunodysfunction.
Figure 3

Flow cytometric analysis of the frequency of HLA-DR + and Tim-3+ monocytes. Peripheral whole-blood samples were collected from 13 patients and 11 healthy controls, stained with the fluorescent antibodies against CD14 (anti-CD14) and major histocompatibility complex class II cell surface receptor encoded by the human leukocyte antigen (anti-HLA-DR) or T-cell immunoglobulin mucin 3 (anti-Tim-3), and measured for the percentage of HLA-DR + CD14+ or Tim-3 + CD14+ monocytes in the total CD14+ monocytes. Data are presented as flowcharts and expressed as the means of individual participants. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to analyze the differences between groups. (A) The gating strategy and representative flow cytometric plots of Tim-3+ and HLA-DR + monocytes are shown. FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; FSC Lin, forward scatter area; SSC Lin, side scatter area. (B) Quantitative analysis.


In the present study, we examined the immune system alterations in patients with H7N9 avian influenza. We found that a high percentage of patients developed SIRS accompanied by a high percentage of activated T cells and increased levels of serum cytokines. Concomitantly, many patients displayed lymphocytopenia, abnormally low monocyte counts, T-cell exhaustion and monocyte dysfunction, which are characteristic of immune paralysis.

The presence of SIRS is predictive of organ dysfunction and mortality [14, 15]. We found that 70% of patients had at least two concurrent SIRS components and detected significantly higher levels of serum IL-6 and IL-8 in the patients than in HCs, which may explain the high morbidity and mortality associated with this disease. However, we did not detect significant alterations in the levels of serum IFN-γ or TNF-α in these patients. This cytokine profile is analogous to that of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) [16, 17]. Furthermore, it has been reported that patients with either H7N9 virus influenza or SARS coronavirus-related illness shared striking similarities with regard to their clinical presentation and disease progression. Therefore, it is possible that the pathogenesis of H7N9 virus infection is similar to that of SARS coronavirus-related infection [18]. Although patients with severe influenza induced by the H1N1 and H5N1 viruses develop a “cytokine storm,” including high levels of serum IFN-γ and TNF-α, which are commonly associated with rapid progression and poor prognosis [11, 19, 20], we did not detect abnormal levels of serum IFN-γ or TNF-α in patients with H7N9 virus infection. These findings suggest that different immune responses may occur in patients with varying types of influenza virus infection. The investigators in one recent study reported that a high frequency of programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1), and its ligand 1 (PD-L1), that expressed T cells impaired T-cell responses to H1N1 infection in patients with influenza [21]. It is possible that similar mechanisms may underlie the failure to detect abnormal levels of serum IFN-γ and TNF-α in patients with H7N9 virus infection. Although proinflammatory IFN-γ and TNF-α responses usually occur at early stages of immune responses, it is also possible that the failure to detect abnormal levels of serum IFN-γ or TNF-α may stem from missing the very early time point in our study. Therefore, further studies are needed to clarify the mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of H7N9 virus infection and host immune responses.

Our results show that many patients with severe avian H7N9 influenza developed T-cell lymphocytopenia. Such a phenomenon is commonly reported in patients with SARS. However, pneumonia caused by other common respiratory viruses are usually associated with a normal or elevated lymphocyte count [22]. The lymphocytopenia in patients with H7N9 avian influenza may be a key factor leading to high morbidity and mortality, because lymphocytopenia is an independent risk factor for ARDS, which is a very dangerous condition for patients with secondary infections [1]. The lymphocytopenia in these patients likely derives from the migration of T lymphocytes into the target tissues, such as the lungs. Alternatively, the lymphocytopenia may stem from virus-stimulated, activation-induced T-cell apoptosis and virus infection–related bone marrow suppression [23].

T lymphocytes play a pivotal role in the defense of viral infection by directly killing virus-infected cells. In this study, we found significantly higher frequencies of CD38 + CD4+, CD38 + CD8+, Tim-3 + CD4+ and Tim-3 + CD8+ T cells in patients with H7N9 avian influenza compared with those in the HCs. It is well-known that CD38 and Tim-3 expression are associated with T-cell activation [13]. The higher frequency of CD38+ and Tim-3+ T cells in patients with H7N9 avian influenza indicated that viral infection induced significant T-cell activation. However, Tim-3 on activated T cells usually provides a negative signal for effector T-cell function and leads to T-cell functional exhaustion [13, 24, 25]. Furthermore, engagement of Tim-3 by its specific ligand of galectin-9 can trigger T-cell apoptosis [26]. Notably, IFN-γ is a potent inducer of galectin-9 protein expression, thus the low IFN-γ expression in patients with severe H7N9 influenza may limit the production of galectin-9, leading to a high frequency of impotent Tim-3+ T cells. Thus, in turn, aberration of T-cell activation in patients with H7N9 avian influenza may render T-cell exhaustion and apoptosis or impotence, leading to poor immune responses. We are interested in further investigating the levels of galectin-9 and T-cell function to discern the precise mechanisms underlying immune responses to H7N9 virus infection in humans.

Monocytes are an important component of the innate immune system, which recognizes pathogens, secretes proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines to initiate the immune response, and presents antigens to trigger adaptive immune responses [27]. In this study, we found a significantly reduced frequency of peripheral blood HLA-DR + CD14+ and Tim-3 + CD14+ monocytes in patients with H7N9 avian influenza, at levels similar to those in patients with septic shock [28], trauma [29] and acute liver failure [30], as well as postoperative patients [31]. In these clinical settings, downregulation of HLA-DR expression usually represents the functional impairment of monocytes and is associated with adverse outcomes. In addition, the reduced levels of Tim-3 expression on monocytes may contribute to the functional deactivation of monocytes, as it was reported previously that constitutive Tim-3 expression in naïve and resting immunocompetent cells promotes inflammation [32].

In addition, we noted that nearly one-half of the patients in our study had evidence of secondary infection, which is very dangerous because secondary bacterial or fungal infection is a common factor leading to mortality in patients with H7N9 avian influenza [1]. We speculate that the increased predisposition to secondary infection of patients is related to the deranged immune response. Therefore, it is crucial for clinicians to pay special attention to patients with severe influenza by modulating immunocompetent cell function to limit adverse consequences in the clinic.

We recognize that our study has limitations, including its small sample size, measurement at one time point for a few markers of functional immunocompetent cells and the lack of antigen-specific T-cell immunity. Therefore, further studies are warranted to measure longitudinally the dynamic changes in the immunological status of patients during the whole time course of H7N9 infection and to assess the function of different types of immunocompetent cells using other functional markers (for example, CD25, CD69, PD-1 and LAG-3) and antigen-specific T-cell immunity by ex vivo experiments in a larger sample population. We are interested in further investigating the molecular mechanisms underlying the immunoderangement in patients with H7N9 avian influenza.


Overall, our findings reveal that patients with H7N9 avian influenza commonly develop SIRS accompanied by T-cell lymphocytopenia and exhaustion, as well as monocyte dysfunction. The immunoderangement may be associated with the high mortality rate associated with this disease.

Key messages

  • Patients with H7N9 avian influenza usually develop ARDS and secondary infection and have a high mortality rate.

  • A hyperactivated inflammatory response and an anti-inflammatory response occur concomitantly in patients with H7N9 avian influenza.

  • Such immune derangement may contribute to the rapid progression of and high mortality associated with this disease.




Acute respiratory distress syndrome


Cytometric bead array


C-reactive protein


Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation


Erythrocyte sedimentation rate


Avian influenza A


Hepatitis B virus


Hepatitis C virus


Severe acute respiratory syndrome


Systemic inflammatory response syndrome.



The manuscript was proofread by Medjaden Bioscience Limited. This work was supported by the 12th Five-Year Significant New Drugs Creation Plan of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2011ZX09302-003-03), the Technology Group Project for Infectious Disease Control of Zhejiang Province (2009R50041) and the Chinese National Natural Science Foundation (81200301), as well as by a grant from the Health Department of Zhejiang Province (2012KYA087).

Authors’ Affiliations

Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Diagnostic and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine


  1. Gao HN, Lu HZ, Cao B, Du B, Shang H, Gan JH, Lu SH, Yang YD, Fang Q, Shen YZ, Xi XM, Gu Q, Zhou XM, Qu HP, Yan Z, Li FM, Zhao W, Gao ZC, Wang GF, Ruan LX, Wang WH, Ye J, Cao HF, Li XW, Zhang WH, Fang XC, He J, Liang WF, Xie J, Zeng M, et al.: Clinical findings in 111 cases of influenza A (H7N9) virus infection. N Engl J Med 2013, 368: 2277-2285. A published erratum appears in N Engl J Med 2013, 369:1869 10.1056/NEJMoa1305584View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Uyeki TM, Cox NJ: Global concerns regarding novel influenza A (H7N9) virus infections. N Engl J Med 2013, 368: 1862-1864. 10.1056/NEJMp1304661View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Li Q, Zhou L, Zhou M, Chen Z, Li F, Wu H, Xiang N, Chen E, Tang F, Wang D, Meng L, Hong Z, Tu W, Cao Y, Li L, Ding F, Liu B, Wang M, Xie R, Gao R, Li X, Bai T, Zou S, He J, Hu J, Xu Y, Chai C, Wang S, Gao Y, Jin L, et al.: Epidemiology of human infections with avian influenza A(H7N9) virus in China. N Engl J Med 2014, 370: 520-532. 10.1056/NEJMoa1304617View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gao R, Cao B, Hu Y, Feng Z, Wang D, Hu W, Chen J, Jie Z, Qiu H, Xu K, Xu X, Lu H, Zhu W, Gao Z, Xiang N, Shen Y, He Z, Gu Y, Zhang Z, Yang Y, Zhao X, Zhou L, Li X, Zou S, Zhang Y, Li X, Yang L, Guo J, Dong J, Li Q, et al.: Human infection with a novel avian-origin influenza A (H7N9) virus. N Engl J Med 2013, 368: 1888-1897. 10.1056/NEJMoa1304459View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Zhang W, Wang L, Hu W, Ding F, Sun H, Li S, Huang L, Li C: Epidemiologic characteristics of cases for influenza A(H7N9) virus infections in China. Clin Infect Dis 2013, 57: 619-620.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Zhu H, Wang D, Kelvin DJ, Li L, Zheng Z, Yoon SW, Wong SS, Farooqui A, Wang J, Banner D, Chen R, Zheng R, Zhou J, Zhang Y, Hong W, Dong W, Cai Q, Roehrl MH, Huang SS, Kelvin AA, Yao T, Zhou B, Chen X, Leung GM, Poon LL, Webster RG, Webby RJ, Peiris JS, Guan Y, Shu Y: Infectivity, transmission, and pathology of human-isolated H7N9 influenza virus in ferrets and pigs. Science 2013, 341: 183-186. A published erratum appears in Science 2013, 341:959 10.1126/science.1239844View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Tharakaraman K, Jayaraman A, Raman R, Viswanathan K, Stebbins NW, Johnson D, Shriver Z, Sasisekharan V, Sasisekharan R: Glycan receptor binding of the influenza A virus H7N9 hemagglutinin. Cell 2013, 153: 1486-1493. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.034PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen Y, Liang W, Yang S, Wu N, Gao H, Sheng J, Yao H, Wo J, Fang Q, Cui D, Li Y, Yao X, Zhang Y, Wu H, Zheng S, Diao H, Xia S, Zhang Y, Chan KH, Tsoi HW, Teng JL, Song W, Wang P, Lau SY, Zheng M, Chan JF, To KK, Chen H, Li L, Yuen KY: Human infections with the emerging avian influenza A H7N9 virus from wet market poultry: clinical analysis and characterisation of viral genome. Lancet 2013, 381: 1916-1925. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60903-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hu Y, Lu S, Song Z, Wang W, Hao P, Li J, Zhang X, Yen HL, Shi B, Li T, Guan W, Xu L, Liu Y, Wang S, Zhang X, Tian D, Zhu Z, He J, Huang K, Chen H, Zheng L, Li X, Ping J, Kang B, Xi X, Zha L, Li Y, Zhang Z, Peiris M, Yuan Z: Association between adverse clinical outcome in human disease caused by novel influenza A H7N9 virus and sustained viral shedding and emergence of antiviral resistance. Lancet 2013, 381: 2273-2279. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61125-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bernard GR, Artigas A, Brigham KL, Carlet J, Falke K, Hudson L, Lamy M, Legall JR, Morris A, Spragg R: The American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS. Definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes, and clinical trial coordination. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994, 149: 818-824. 10.1164/ajrccm.149.3.7509706View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. de Jong MD, Simmons CP, Thanh TT, Hien VM, Smith GJD, Chau TNB, Hoang DM, Chau NVV, Khanh TH, Dong VC, Qui PT, Cam BV, Ha DQ, Guan Y, Peiris JSM, Chinh NT, Hien TT, Farrar J: Fatal outcome of human influenza A (H5N1) is associated with high viral load and hypercytokinemia. Nat Med 2006, 12: 1203-1207. 10.1038/nm1477PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference: Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Med 1992, 20: 864-874. 10.1097/00003246-199206000-00025View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones RB, Ndhlovu LC, Barbour JD, Sheth PM, Jha AR, Long BR, Wong JC, Satkunarajah M, Schweneker M, Chapman JM, Gyenes G, Vali B, Hyrcza MD, Yue FY, Kovacs C, Sassi A, Loutfy M, Halpenny R, Persad D, Spotts G, Hecht FM, Chun TW, McCune JM, Kaul R, Rini JM, Nixon DF, Ostrowski MA: Tim-3 expression defines a novel population of dysfunctional T cells with highly elevated frequencies in progressive HIV-1 infection. J Exp Med 2008, 205: 2763-2779. 10.1084/jem.20081398PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Talmor M, Hydo L, Barie PS: Relationship of systemic inflammatory response syndrome to organ dysfunction, length of stay, and mortality in critical surgical illness: effect of intensive care unit resuscitation. Arch Surg 1999, 134: 81-87. 10.1001/archsurg.134.1.81View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Calandra T, Baumgartner JD, Grau GE, Wu MM, Lambert PH, Schellekens J, Verhoef J, Glauser MP, Swiss-Dutch J5 Immunoglobulin Study Group: Prognostic values of tumor necrosis factor/cachectin, interleukin-1, interferon-α, and interferon-γ in the serum of patients with septic shock. Swiss-Dutch J5 immunoglobulin study group. J Infect Dis 1990, 161: 982-987. 10.1093/infdis/161.5.982View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Jiang Y, Xu J, Zhou C, Wu Z, Zhong S, Liu J, Luo W, Chen T, Qin Q, Deng P: Characterization of cytokine/chemokine profiles of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005, 171: 850-857. 10.1164/rccm.200407-857OCView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Tang NL, Chan PK, Wong CK, To KF, Wu AK, Sung YM, Hui DS, Sung JJ, Lam CW: Early enhanced expression of interferon-inducible protein-10 (CXCL-10) and other chemokines predicts adverse outcome in severe acute respiratory syndrome. Clin Chem 2005, 51: 2333-2340. 10.1373/clinchem.2005.054460View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Spiegel M, Pichlmair A, Martínez-Sobrido L, Cros J, García-Sastre A, Haller O, Weber F: Inhibition of β interferon induction by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus suggests a two-step model for activation of interferon regulatory factor 3. J Virol 2005, 79: 2079-2086. 10.1128/JVI.79.4.2079-2086.2005PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Woo PCY, Tung ETK, Chan KH, Lau CCY, Lau SKP, Yuen KY: Cytokine profiles induced by the novel swine-origin influenza A/H1N1 virus: implications for treatment strategies. J Infect Dis 2010, 201: 346-353. 10.1086/649785View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Almansa R, Anton A, Ramirez P, Martin-Loeches I, Banner D, Pumarola T, Xu L, Blanco J, Ran L, Lopez-Campos G, Martin-Sanchez F, Socias L, Loza A, Andaluz D, Maravi E, Gordón M, Gallegos MC, Fernandez V, León C, Merino P, Marcos MA, Gandía F, Bobillo F, Resino S, Eiros JM, Castro C, Mateo P, Gonzalez-Rivera M, Rello J, de Lejarazu RO, et al.: Direct association between pharyngeal viral secretion and host cytokine response in severe pandemic influenza. BMC Infect Dis 2011, 11: 232. 10.1186/1471-2334-11-232PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Valero-Pacheco N, Arriaga-Pizano L, Ferat-Osorio E, Mora-Velandia LM, Pastelin-Palacios R, Villasís-Keever MÁ, Alpuche-Aranda C, Sánchez-Torres LE, Isibasi A, Bonifaz L, López-Macías C: PD-L1 expression induced by the 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1) virus impairs the human T cell response. Clin Dev Immunol 2013, 2013: 989673.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Cui W, Fan Y, Wu W, Zhang F, Wang JY, Ni AP: Expression of lymphocytes and lymphocyte subsets in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Clin Infect Dis 2003, 37: 857-859. 10.1086/378587View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Chen J, Subbarao K: The immunobiology of SARS. Annu Rev Immunol 2007, 25: 443-472. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141706View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Golden-Mason L, Palmer BE, Kassam N, Townshend-Bulson L, Livingston S, McMahon BJ, Castelblanco N, Kuchroo V, Gretch DR, Rosen HR: Negative immune regulator Tim-3 is overexpressed on T cells in hepatitis C virus infection and its blockade rescues dysfunctional CD4 + and CD8 + T cells. J Virol 2009, 83: 9122-9130. 10.1128/JVI.00639-09PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Wu W, Shi Y, Li S, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Wu Y, Chen Z: Blockade of Tim-3 signaling restores the virus-specific CD8 + T-cell response in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Eur J Immunol 2012, 42: 1180-1191. 10.1002/eji.201141852View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lv K, Zhang Y, Zhang M, Zhong M, Suo Q: Galectin-9 ameliorates Con A-induced hepatitis by inducing CD4 + CD25 low/int effector T-cell apoptosis and increasing regulatory T cell number. PLoS One 2012, 7: e48379. 10.1371/journal.pone.0048379PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Gordon S, Taylor PR: Monocyte and macrophage heterogeneity. Nat Rev Immunol 2005, 5: 953-964. 10.1038/nri1733View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pangault C, Le Tulzo Y, Tattevin P, Guilloux V, Bescher N, Drénou B: Down-modulation of granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor receptor on monocytes during human septic shock. Crit Care Med 2006, 34: 1193-1201. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000207339.11477.62View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Flohé S, Lendemans S, Selbach C, Waydhas C, Ackermann M, Schade FU, Kreuzfelder E: Effect of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor on the immune response of circulating monocytes after severe trauma. Crit Care Med 2003, 31: 2462-2469. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000089640.17523.57View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Antoniades CG, Berry PA, Davies ET, Hussain M, Bernal W, Vergani D, Wendon J: Reduced monocyte HLA-DR expression: a novel biomarker of disease severity and outcome in acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure. Hepatology 2006, 44: 34-43. 10.1002/hep.21240View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Tschaikowsky K, Hedwig-Geissing M, Schiele A, Bremer F, Schywalsky M, Schüttler J: Coincidence of pro- and anti-inflammatory responses in the early phase of severe sepsis: longitudinal study of mononuclear histocompatibility leukocyte antigen-DR expression, procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and changes in T-cell subsets in septic and postoperative patients. Crit Care Med 2002, 30: 1015-1023. 10.1097/00003246-200205000-00010View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Anderson AC, Anderson DE, Bregoli L, Hastings WD, Kassam N, Lei C, Chandwaskar R, Karman J, Su EW, Hirashima M, Bruce JN, Kane LP, Kuchroo VK, Hafler DA: Promotion of tissue inflammation by the immune receptor Tim-3 expressed on innate immune cells. Science 2007, 318: 1141-1143. 10.1126/science.1148536View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Wu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.