Open Access

Safety of dexmedetomidine sedation in postoperative cardiac surgery patients

Critical Care201317:435

DOI: 10.1186/cc12724

Published: 11 June 2013

In a meta-analysis regarding efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine sedation in postoperative cardiac surgery patients [1], Lin and colleagues' conclusion that dexmedetomidine may decrease the risk of hyperglycemia is questionable. In their meta-analysis of hyperglycemia in Figure 3 of their report, three articles regarding the use of dexmedetomidine sedation after cardiac surgery are cited [24]. In the study of Abd Aziz and colleagues [2], however, postoperative glucose level was not assessed as an end point. Shehabi and colleagues [3] showed that incidence of hyperglycemia (blood sugar level >10 mmol/L) was not significantly different between dexmedetomidine and morphine groups (36.8% versus 47.6%, P = 0.062). Herr and colleagues [4] demonstrated that the incidence of treatment-emergent hyperglycemia reaction was similar between dexmedetomidine and propofol groups (3% versus 3%, P = 0.750). Furthermore, a recent meta-analysis indicates that dexmedetomidine does not decrease risk of hyperglycemia compared with the traditional sedative and analgesic agents in critically ill adult patients [5]. Thus, we are concerned about this incorrect conclusion of Lin and colleagues on the effect of dexmedetomidine on blood glucose level.

Actually, there is evidence in the literature indicating that dexmedetomidine can induce hyperglycemia, mediated via postsynaptic α2 adrenoreceptors located on pancreatic β cells with a reduction of insulin secretion [6, 7]. Even clinical studies show that dexmedetomidine can increase blood glucose level during minimally invasive video gynecologic surgical procedures [8] and cause hypoinsulinemia in postoperative patients needing sedation in the intensive care unit [9]. Thus, the effect of dexmedetomidine on perioperative blood glucose is rather complex and the currently available data from meta-analyses of dexmedetomidine studies have not addressed this issue. We argue that further large randomized controlled trials are needed to obtain conclusive evidence and for determining the best choice among different therapeutic options.



Fu-Shan Xue carefully read the paper of Lin and colleagues and analyzed their data, suggested the comment points and drafted this manuscript; Yi Cheng and Rui-Ping Li carefully read the paper of Lin and colleagues and analyzed their data, and helped to write this manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Anesthesiology, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College


  1. Lin YY, He B, Chen J, Wang ZN: Can dexmedetomidine be a safe and efficacious sedative agent in post-cardiac surgery patients? a meta analysis. Crit Care 2012, 16: R169. 10.1186/cc11646PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Abd Aziz N, Chue MC, Yong CY, Hassan Y, Awaisu A, Hassan J, Kamarulzaman MH: Efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine versus morphine in post-operative cardiac surgery patients. Int J Clin Pharm 2011, 33: 150-154. 10.1007/s11096-011-9480-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Shehabi Y, Grant P, Wolfenden H, Hammond N, Bass F, Campbell M, Chen J: Prevalence of delirium with dexmedetomidine compared with morphine based therapy after cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial (DEXmedetomidine COmpared to Morphine-DEXCOM Study). Anesthesiology 2009, 111: 1075-1084. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181b6a783View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Herr DL, Sum-Ping ST, England M: ICU sedation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: dexmedetomidine-based versus propofol-based sedation regimens. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2003, 17: 576-584. 10.1016/S1053-0770(03)00200-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Tan JA, Ho KM: Use of dexmedetomidine as a sedative and analgesic agent in critically ill adult patients: a meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 2010, 36: 926-939. 10.1007/s00134-010-1877-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Pypendop BH, Barter LS, Stanley SD, Ilkiw JE: Hemodynamic effects of dexmedetomidine in isoflurane-anesthetized cats. Vet Anaesth Analg 2011, 38: 555-567. 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2011.00663.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Restitutti F, Raekallio M, Vainionpää M, Kuusela E, Vainio O: Plasma glucose, insulin, free fatty acids, lactate and cortisol concentrations in dexmedetomidine-sedated dogs with or without MK-467: a peripheral α-2 adrenoceptor antagonist. Vet J 2012, 193: 481-485. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.12.010View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bulow NM, Barbosa NV, Rocha JB: Opioid consumption in total intravenous anesthesia is reduced with dexmedetomidine: a comparative study with remifentanil in gynecologic videolaparoscopic surgery. J Clin Anesth 2007, 19: 280-285. 10.1016/j.jclinane.2007.01.004View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Venn RM, Bryant A, Hall GM, Grounds RM: Effects of dexmedetomidine on adrenocortical function, and the cardiovascular, endocrine and inflammatory responses in post-operative patients needing sedation in the intensive care unit. Br J Anaesth 2001, 86: 650-656. 10.1093/bja/86.5.650View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© BioMed Central Ltd 2013