The role of natural killer cells in the pathogenesis of sepsis: the ongoing enigma
© BioMed Central Ltd 2012
Published: 11 December 2012
Skip to main content
© BioMed Central Ltd 2012
Published: 11 December 2012
The study by Souza-Fonseca-Guimaraes and colleagues in the previous issue of Critical Care shows several alterations in blood natural killer (NK) characteristics during human sepsis and systemic inflammatory response syndrome, including changes in NK cell numbers, Toll-like receptor (TLR) expression, and responsiveness to TLR agonists. This paper advances our knowledge of NK cell biology during sepsis and provides the background for future investigations.
The paper by Souza-Fonseca-Guimaraes and colleagues  in the previous issue of Critical Care expands our understanding of natural killer (NK) cell biology during human sepsis. This is the first study to describe Toll-like receptor (TLR) protein expression by human NK cells. This paper also extends previous reports by localizing TLR to specific cellular compartments and documenting differences in compartmental expression between normal volunteers and patients with sepsis or systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). The authors report that naïve human NK cells express both TLR2 and TLR4, primarily intracellularly, and that intracellular TLR2 expression is upregulated among CD56dim NK cells during sepsis and SIRS. An increase in the percentage of NK cells expressing surface TLR4 was observed during SIRS but not sepsis, whereas increased intracellular TLR4 expression was observed during both conditions. The authors postulate that surface TLR4 expression could be used to discriminate patients with SIRS from patients with sepsis. However, that contention requires further investigation because the SIRS population evaluated in this investigation is not well defined. Patients with SIRS were described as demonstrating clinical criteria for SIRS with an absence of infection. However, little clinical information is provided for the SIRS group to define the etiology of the acute inflammatory syndrome in that population. In addition, a relatively small number of subjects were enrolled in this study, and this makes it difficult to establish a surface TLR4 expression threshold that can be used to define the SIRS population. Nevertheless, their novel observation provides a starting point for further study.
This report documents attenuated ex vivo interferon gamma (IFNγ) production by NK cells from patients with sepsis or SIRS in response to TLR agonists and NK cell-activating cytokines. This finding is consistent with the 'endotoxin tolerant' phenotype that has been described in patients with sepsis [2, 3] but extends prior observations by showing specific alterations among NK cells. However, the functional significance of this observation remains to be determined. Is this a protective mechanism that acts to decrease NK cell-mediated injury during sepsis? Alternatively, diminished NK cell function may impair the host response to ongoing and secondary infections. Impaired IFNγ production is considered a hallmark of sepsis-induced immunosuppression [4, 5], yet the contribution of NK cell dysfunction to sepsis-induced immunosuppression has not been determined and deserves further consideration.
The decrease in blood NK cell numbers reported in this article is consistent with previous observations. Boomer and colleagues  demonstrated decreased numbers of NK cells in the blood of patients with sepsis. A decline in blood NK cell numbers has also been documented in septic mice . The mechanisms underlying the drop in blood NK cell numbers are not completely clear, but recent studies have documented that NK cells migrate from blood into sites of infection early during the course of sepsis in mice [7, 8]. NK cell apoptosis is another likely mechanism . Regardless of the mechanism, this study supports the contention that both CD56dim and CD56bright NK cells become activated early during the course of sepsis. However, it is currently unclear whether both NK cell subsets play a functional role in the pathogenesis of human sepsis. Owing to differences among NK cell populations in humans and mice, that question may be difficult to answer. Nevertheless, Marquardt and colleagues  have postulated that murine CXCR3+ NK cells are functionally similar to CD56bright NK cells in humans. Recent studies show that CXCR3+ NK cells migrate to sites of infection and that blockade or ablation of CXCR3 provides functional improvement in experimental models of sepsis . That observation supports a role for CD56bright NK cells in the pathogenesis of murine sepsis. However, it is unclear whether those findings will extrapolate to humans. The analysis of NK cell functions during human sepsis is further complicated by the inability to access NK cells in tissues other than blood. It is possible, even likely, that the functions of blood NK cells differ from those of their tissue counterparts during sepsis and that analysis of blood NK cells provides an incomplete picture of global NK cell activity.
A major question that remains is whether NK cell activation is deleterious or beneficial (or both) during sepsis. In a review article published in Molecular Medicine earlier this year, Souza-Fonseca-Guimaraes and colleagues  outlined the beneficial and deleterious effects of NK cell activation during bacterial infection. The authors acknowledged evidence that NK cells facilitate the innate immune response against bacterial infection. However, NK cells also appear to mediate tissue damage during the acute phase of sepsis. Therefore, it is likely that NK cells have beneficial and deleterious effects during systemic infection, and this will intensify the challenge of manipulating NK cell functions for therapeutic benefit during sepsis.
systemic inflammatory response syndrome