Clinical review: Practical approach to hyponatraemia and hypernatraemia in critically ill patients
© BioMed Central Ltd 2013
Published: 27 February 2013
Skip to main content
© BioMed Central Ltd 2013
Published: 27 February 2013
Disturbances in sodium concentration are common in the critically ill patient and associated with increased mortality. The key principle in treatment and prevention is that plasma [Na+] (P-[Na+]) is determined by external water and cation balances. P-[Na+] determines plasma tonicity. An important exception is hyperglycaemia, where P-[Na+] may be reduced despite plasma hypertonicity. The patient is first treated to secure airway, breathing and circulation to diminish secondary organ damage. Symptoms are critical when handling a patient with hyponatraemia. Severe symptoms are treated with 2 ml/kg 3% NaCl bolus infusions irrespective of the supposed duration of hyponatraemia. The goal is to reduce cerebral symptoms. The bolus therapy ensures an immediate and controllable rise in P-[Na+]. A maximum of three boluses are given (increases P-[Na+] about 6 mmol/l). In all patients with hyponatraemia, correction above 10 mmol/l/day must be avoided to reduce the risk of osmotic demyelination. Practical measures for handling a rapid rise in P-[Na+] are discussed. The risk of overcorrection is associated with the mechanisms that cause hyponatraemia. Traditional classifications according to volume status are notoriously difficult to handle in clinical practice. Moreover, multiple combined mechanisms are common. More than one mechanism must therefore be considered for safe and lasting correction. Hypernatraemia is less common than hyponatraemia, but implies that the patient is more ill and has a worse prognosis. A practical approach includes treatment of the underlying diseases and restoration of the distorted water and salt balances. Multiple combined mechanisms are common and must be searched for. Importantly, hypernatraemia is not only a matter of water deficit, and treatment of the critically ill patient with an accumulated fluid balance of 20 litres and corresponding weight gain should not comprise more water, but measures to invoke a negative cation balance. Reduction of hypernatraemia/hypertonicity is critical, but should not exceed 12 mmol/l/day in order to reduce the risk of rebounding brain oedema.
Hyponatraemia and hypernatraemia are frequent in patients admitted to the ICU and may even be acquired during their stay [1–8]. These patients have a higher overall mortality, and even slight changes in plasma [Na+] (P-[Na+]) are associated with an increased risk of death [3, 9].
A 58-year-old male is admitted somnolent (Glasgow Coma Scale = 11) to the emergency department. He has a newly discovered tonsil cancer, consumes too much alcohol, has arterial hypertension that is being treated with losartan/thiazid and is receiving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). He is spontaneously breathing with a patent airway. Mean arterial pressure is 100 mmHg, heart rate = 120 beats/minute. Arterial blood gas analysis is as follows: pH = 7.57, pCO2 = 3.4 kPa/ 26 mmHg, pO2 = 7.9 kPa/59 mmHg, Hgb = 7.3, lactate = 1.6 mmol/l, BE = 1.3, plasma [Glucose] (P-[Glc]) = 7.6 mmol/l, P-[Na+] = 90 mmol/l and P-[K+] = 3.5 mmol/l. Cerebral CT scanning shows no bleeding. Infusion of 0.9% NaCl is instituted and he is transferred to the ICU. After 6 hours (P-[Na+] = 95 mmol/l), the patient is more awake, but delirious. To achieve P-[Na+] = 120 mmol/l, the 0.9% NaCl infusions are increased. After 12 hours (P-[Na+] = 105 mmol/l), the patient is awake but confused, and phenobarbital and haloperidol are given. Respiratory insufficiency necessitates intubation after 24 hours (P-Na+ = 115 mmol/l). The patient is seen by an oncologist and diagnosed quite informally with syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (SIADH). P-[Na+] rises progressively. On day 6, quadriplegia and coma (Glasgow Coma Scale = 3 without sedation) are observed (P-[Na+] = 144 mmol/l). A neurologist proposes a diagnosis of osmotic demyelinisation (OD). Over the next 2 days, P-[Na+] increases to 151 mmol/l and he dies from intractable cardiac arrest.
This case story illustrates common and important problems in managing the hyponatraemic patient. First, the initial 0.9 % NaCl approach is inadequate to ensure a rapid and controllable response . Second, no measures to avoid overcorrection are taken, and he gets hypernatraemia despite being in the ICU . Third, hyponatraemia often has multiple causes . Fourth, nothing is done to identify the mechanisms of hyponatraemia .
This review takes a practical approach to the critically ill patient with dysnatraemia.
where α and β are the coefficients from the linear regression.
where [Na+]1 is the initial plasma concentration and [Na+]2 is the concentration that results from the change in the external balances of water (ΔTBW) and cations (Δ(Na+ + K+)).
Equation 2 is fundamental in understanding changes in P-[Na+]. It is, therefore, also fundamental in practical patient treatment. It is important, however, to keep in mind that the impending output side of the water and cation balances can only be guessed. Frequent measurement of output (especially diuresis) and P-[Na+] is necessary and input of fluids must be adjusted dynamically.
Equations 1 and 2 assume that plasma tonicity is determined by P-[Na+]. This is true in hypernatraemia and, by far, in the most common hyponatraemic conditions. Translocational hyponatraemia is an exception. In this condition osmotically active substances confined to the extracellular/plasma compartment cause a shift of water from the intracellular compartment. In this situation, the resulting hyponatraemia is hypertonic. The most frequent clinical condition is hyperglycaemia (P-[Na+] is reduced approximately 0.4 mmol/l per mmol/l increase in P-[Glc] (or a reduction of 2.4 meq/l per 100 mg/dl increase)) , but the condition can also be caused by mannitol. Pseudohyponatraemia is an unusual measurement flaw in patients with hyperlipaemia/hyperproteinaemia whose plasma tonicity is normal. In the rest of this article, 'hyponatraemia' refers to hyponatraemia where plasma tonicity is decreased.
P-[Na+] is tightly regulated between 135 and 145 mmol/l primarily by water intake (thirst) and renal water excretion . Of lesser quantitative importance, P-[Na+] is regulated by the kidney's regulation of cation excretion via the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Thirst is stimulated when P-[Na+] increases a few percent . It is also stimulated by a decrease in the effective circulating volume, which is the part of the extracellular volume (ECV) that effectively perfuses the tissue . Arginine vasopressin (vasopressin, or antidiuretic hormone (ADH)) reduces renal water excretion. Vasopressin binds to the V2-receptor in the collecting duct. This promotes trafficking of aquaporin 2 to the apical membrane and passive water reabsorption to the hypertonic medullary interstitium . Vasopressin secretion is stimulated when P-[Na+] increases . Vasopressin release can also be stimulated non-osmotically by a reduced effective circulating volume, stress, pain, nausea, vomiting, various drugs and exercise.
A low solute intake reduces urine solute excretion and thereby urine volume despite maximally diluted urine. In contrast, a high protein/urea intake or generation will increase the urine volume. However, urea does not directly determine P-[Na+] (according to Equation 2). This is so because in the whole body perspective, urea eventually crosses cell membranes and therefore is an ineffective osmolyte that does not contribute to water flux between cells and extracellular volume .
where U[Na+] and U[K+] are urine Na+ and K+ concentrations. If electrolyte free water clearance (cH2Oe) is positive, the urine increases P-[Na+]; and if cH2Oe is negative, urine decreases P-[Na+].
Cerebral symptoms in hyponatraemia
Nausea and vomiting
Muscle weakness, cramps or spasms
Crucially, secondary brain damage caused by hypoxia, hypercapnia and hypoperfusion should ardently be avoided with an ABC approach [10, 26]. Next, immediate ICP reduction is best induced with one or more boluses of 2 ml/kg 3% NaCl (or a corresponding amount of more hypertonic NaCl) given intravenously/intraosseously [27–29]. The effect is immediate, and bolus doses may be repeated at 5-minute intervals. One 2 ml/kg 3% NaCl bolus causes a controllable rise in P-[Na+] of about 2 mmol/l (Example 1 in Box 1). Cerebral symptoms decrease when P-[Na+] increases by 4 to 6 mmol/l [27–29]. Infusion of 0.9% NaCl should not be used to acutely increase P-[Na+] as in the case story: such an infusion does not cause an immediate, controllable increase in P-[Na+], and 0.9% NaCl might worsen the hyponatraemia in SIADH (see SIADH section and Box 1). Vasopressin V2-receptor antagonists are not recommended: V2-receptor antagonists do not induce a controllable and fast increase in P-[Na+] and the induction/worsening of hypovolemia can be hazardous .
Cerebral disease, hepatic encephalopathy and sedation can cause severe symptoms similar to those of hyponatraemia , but a slight P-[Na+] increase will not worsen these conditions [32, 33]. However, the clinician must always consider other conditions if the patient fails to respond, and a maximum of three boluses should be given (complete awakening cannot be anticipated if the patient has suffered elevated ICP/seizures for hours ).
There is no set P-[Na+] level below which severe symptoms arise. Cerebral symptoms have been described at P-[Na+] levels between 125 and 130 mmol/l [34, 35]. A MRI study in pigs demonstrated that cellular swelling in the brain oedema corresponds with the relative reduction in P-[Na+] . This indicates that it is the relative reduction and its speed that are clinically interesting and not an arbitrarily defined absolute P-[Na+] value . Hence, a P-[Na+] reduction from 160 to 128 mmol/linduces as much osmotic stress to the brain as a reduction from 113 to 90 mmol/l (illustrated in the case story). This also implies that patients with intracranial pathology (for example, intracranial bleeding, tumour or oedema) have an increased risk of cerebral deterioration if brain cells swell and that they may need correction at a higher P-[Na+] (for example, P-[Na+] = 135 mmol/l). Bolus treatment is therefore instituted based on the patient's symptoms and not on the basis of an arbitrarily defined P-[Na+] value.
Treatment should be guided by the patient's symptoms and not by the assumed acute (<48 hours) or chronic nature of hyponatraemia. Classification of acute versus chronic hyponatraemia is based on brain-adaptive responses to hyponatraemia. Patients with days of hyponatraemia have fewer cerebral symptoms than patients with newly developed hyponatraemia . This has been linked with cerebral volume regulation [38, 39]. Adaption to sustained hyponatraemia by loss of organic osmolytes has also been proposed to increase the risk of OD (formerly known as central pontine myelinolysis) when correcting hyponatraemia [40–43]. OD is a devastating clinical condition with progressive quadriplegia, dysarthria, dysphagia and alterations of consciousness days after hyponatraemia correction, and it is proposed to be due to cell shrinkage and/or water diffusion differences in the brain [22, 44]. Alcoholism, malnutrition, hypokalaemia, liver failure and malignant disease increase the risk of OD .
These observations lie at the root of the distinction between acute and chronic hyponatraemia in treatment protocols [46, 47]. This distinction is arbitrary, though, and difficult to implement in practice. First, asymptomatic chronic hyponatraemic patients bear the highest risk of symptomatic hyponatraemia, that is, acute worsening of chronic hyponatraemia with looming brain oedema (for example, as in the case story) . Second, it is difficult to determine the time frame of hyponatraemia in the comatose patient brought to the emergency department (for example, as in the case story). Finally, OD has been demonstrated in case reports after correction of acute (<48 h) hyponatraemia, so cautious correction is also important in these cases [42, 49].
Avoiding overcorrection is pivotal to diminish the risk of OD (see the case story). No prospective studies have established an absolutely safe and definitive speed for correction of hyponatraemia. In retrospective studies, OD has been seen in patients corrected with more than 12 mmol/1 day and not in less rapidly corrected patients [41, 43, 50]. In a small clinical MRI study, OD lesions were seen in patients corrected with more than 10 mmol/l/day .
Because OD is more likely when the patients are corrected by more than 12 mmol/l/day, it seems reasonable, in the light of the brain's adaption mechanisms, not to correct at a faster pace, even though there is no absolutely safe rate. Conservative therapeutic goals for correction of 8 mmol/1 in 24 hours, 14 mmol/1 in 48 hours and 16 mmol/l in 72 hours have been proposed . Therefore, only three 2 ml/kg 3% NaCl bolus doses should be given to patients with severe symptoms [51, 52].
Brisk diuresis is the most common cause of over-correction even without sodium input [51, 53]. Diuresis can be counteracted by administering water and, if necessary, using desmopressin . Hypokalaemia correction can contribute to P-[Na+] overcorrection. If renal replacement therapy is necessary (for example, fluid overload or hyperkalaemia), P-[Na+] changes can be controlled by lowering the Na+ concentration in the replacement fluid to the desired P-[Na+] level by adding water (note that this will also reduce the concentration of all other components in the fluid)  or by reducing the blood flow .
The population of hyponatraemia patients in the ICU without severe symptoms comprises two groups: one initially with severe symptoms stabilized with bolus therapy and one initially not having severe symptoms. In these patients, treatment must be individualized and the underlying mechanisms identified for safe and lasting correction.
Traditional classifications according to volume status are of little use in clinical practice since hypo- and normovolaemia cannot be reliably separated [57, 58], and multiple combined causes are common so a simple scheme cannot be used (see the case story) [11, 59]. Mechanisms causing hyponatraemia are often revealed by the patient's treatment response . Importantly, the initial mechanisms causing hyponatraemia may be evanescent and a rapid P-[Na+] increase may occur. In all patients with hyponatraemia spot urine for urine osmolality and U-[Na+] determination should be sampled as fast as possible and preferably before treatment.
Drugs associated with hyponatraemia
Methylenedioxymethyl- amphetamine (ecstacy)
Thiazide-induced hyponatraemia (TIH) is common and may have contributed to the hyponatraemia in the case story [50, 63]. The mechanisms by which some individuals (females more than males) develop TIH are not clear . In contrast to loop diuretics, thiazides do not reduce the medullary concentration gradient in the kidneys necessary for concentrating the urine, but reduce NaCl transport in the diluting segment of the nephron. Desalination is a necessary consequence of thiazides , but whether this results in overt hyponatraemia is dependent on other partly unknown factors. A preexisting urine dilution defect (old age, medications like NSAIDs) may be worsened by thiazides independently of the vasopressin levels . One study proposes increased thirst as a mechanism for TIH . However, a small decrease in effective circulating volume with non-osmotically stimulated thirst/vasopressin-secretion may also contribute. Following TIH, a substantial risk of overcorrection looms.
In conditions with increased ECV/plasma volume (congestive heart failure, cirrhosis, nephrotic syndrome and sepsis), hyponatraemia is caused by non-osmotic stimulation of vasopressin and thirst due to a reduced effective circulating volume. Stigmata and the patient's history may help the diagnosis. Optimizing the haemodynamics is the cornerstone of treatment in this situation. The underlying conditions can occasionally be improved, such as by angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in heart failure  and the use of spironolactone in advanced liver disease . P-[Na+] is corrected with water restriction (avoid hypotonic fluids) and loop diuretics . Treatment with V2-receptor antagonists seems rational, but a randomized trial has shown no survival benefits , and overcorrection may occur . Hypertonic saline infusion (improves effective circulating volume) together with loop diuretics has been shown to be effective sometimes in refractory heart failure and ascites .
In hypovolaemia conditions, loss of total body solutes (Na+ and K+) results in a reduced effective circulating volume, non-osmotic vasopressin secretion and thirst. In this situation, hypotonic fluid ingestion/infusion causes hyponatraemia. Differentiating these conditions from SIADH can be challenging because the reduced effective circulating volume (and ECV) is difficult to determine clinically [57, 58].
Extra-renal causes of solute loss are diagnosed by the patient's history (bleeding, gastrointestinal loss, exercise  and sweating) and by U-[Na+] <30 mmol/l in spot urine; however, exceptions exist (concurrent use of diuretics, compensating renal loss of NaHCO3 in metabolic alkalosis (vomiting) or mineralocorticoid insufficiency).
The solute loss can also have renal causes. TIH has previously been discussed as a potential cause. Other renal mechanisms are osmotic diuresis, salt-losing nephropathy including mineralocorticoid deficiency, and cerebral salt wasting (CSW).
CSW is a condition with reduced effective circulating volume and unexplained/inappropriate natriuresis. The mechanisms leading to it are not clear [72, 73]. Diagnostic difficulties are rooted in the problem of determining the effective circulating volume and in the fact that the neurointensive patient (for example, traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid haemorrhage) receives large amounts of normal and hypertonic saline to avoid hypovolaemia and hyponatraemia . This sodium loading induces natriuresis in the normal kidney [75, 76]. Inadequate release of brain natriuretic peptide has been proposed as a contributing mechanism in CSW .
Renal causes of hyponatraemia result in high U-[Na+] levels and may have characteristics similar to those of SIADH. Responses to infusion of 1 to 2 l 0.9% NaCl can help clarify the diagnosis. Increased P-[Na+] favours ECV/Na+ deficit: sodium, and to a lesser extent water, is retained, which increases P-[Na+]. Additionally, normal saline restores the effective circulating volume and reduces the non-osmotic stimulus of vasopressin secretion. Unchanged or decreased P-[Na+] makes SIADH likely: the patient with SIADH is normally in sodium balance (output is reflected in input) and the infused Na+ is excreted. However, the urine is concentrated and urine cations are generally higher than the 0.9% NaCl (308 mOsm) resulting in retention of water and a decrease in P-[Na+] (cH2Oe is negative) (Example 2 in Box 1) . Infusions of 0.9% NaCl must increase ECV by 1 to 2 l and the infusion speed must therefore exceed ongoing losses .
Hyponatraemia induced by diuretics may entail a fractional excretion of uric acid (FE-UA = (U-[uric acid] × P-[creatinine])/(U-[creatinine] × P-[uric acid])) below 8% . However, CSW and SIADH can both have an FE-UA >12%, and it may be necessary to distinguish between the two conditions in terms of their response to water restriction or a vasopressin V2-receptor antagonist (FE-UA and P-[Na+] is normalized in SIADH) . However, this approach is not recommended in the neurointensive patient because it involves a substantial risk of worsening the hypovolaemia . A practical approach is to control P-[Na+] with 0.9% NaCl and hypertonic NaCl in the neurointensive patient .
Once the diagnosis is established, the underlying disease should be treated and the balances, including potassium and water deficit, should be restored. Abolition of the non-osmotic stimulus of vasopressin secretion involves a substantial risk of overcorrection caused by brisk diuresis.
Non-osmotic vasopressin secretion and abnormal thirst are present in SIADH despite a normal effective circulating volume [78, 82–85]. In the critically ill patient, the mechanisms of inappropriate vasopressin secretion and thirst are heterogeneous. This may be due to various drugs (Table 2), malignant disease, central nervous system disorders (infection, bleeding, thrombosis, space-occupying disorders, psychosis and generalised disorders), pulmonary disorders (infection, asthma, respirator treatment) or other causes (general anaesthesia, postoperative nausea, pain and stress) [78, 86]. These causes of SIADH may be divided into self-limiting mechanisms with an inherent risk of overcorrection when the vasopressin stimuli are abolished, and persistent conditions, for example, a paraneoplastic phenomenon that, in the absence of vasopressin V2-receptor antagonist treatment, will rarely be overcorrected.
When hyponatraemia persists, SIADH may be diagnosed by conventional criteria: plasma hypo-osmolality (P-Osm <275 mOsm/kg) with a not maximally diluted urine osmolality (typically U-Osm >100 mOsm/kg), high U[Na+] (>30 mmol/l), normal effective circulating volume and normal renal, thyroid and adrenal function [78, 86–88].
Other hyponatraemia mechanisms are likely to co-exist in the critically ill patient (for example, thiazide therapy, low solute intake, renal impairment), and it is important to determine and correct these causes. Urine investigation (U-Osm and U-Na+) is important, although it is not always performed . U-Na+ can be low in SIADH with a low salt intake. Failure to increase P-[Na+] with 1 to 2 l 0.9% NaCl intravenously is a practical way of tracing SIADH without inviting the risk of circulatory collapse (Example 2 in Box 1). Plasma uric acid below 238 μmol/l (<4 mg/dl) and FE-UA above 12% also likely suggest SIADH .
When a reduced effective circulating volume has been ruled out and persistent SIADH is a likely diagnosis, the cornerstone is investigation and treatment of its underlying causes. In the critically ill patient, the input side of Equation 2 is controlled and hyponatraemia may be corrected with water restriction and avoidance of hypotonic fluids. Loop diuretics and increased solute intake (for example, 0.5 to 1 g/kg/day urea in the gastric tube ) can be used to increase water excretion. Compliance problems with urea administration in the critically ill patient seem small, and urea (as ineffective osmolytes) has been shown to reduce the risk of OD in experimental studies . If SIADH persists, vasopressin V2-receptor antagonists may be the most effective option in terms of correcting P-[Na+]. However, lack of studies in the critically ill population with persistent SIADH weakens this approach .
In adrenal insufficiency with glucocorticoid deficiency, the hyponatraemia mechanisms include an increased vasopressin/thirst response  and a decreased effective circulating volume . In the critically ill patient with suspected adrenal insufficiency, a random serum cortisol and plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone is obtained followed by 100 mg hydrocortisone intravenously. A serum cortisol level above 700 nmol/l (25 μg/dl) virtually excludes adrenal insufficiency [94, 95]. If this is inconclusive, low-dose adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation should be performed after cessation of hydrocortisone (details in Figure 2).
Hypothyroidism is occasionally associated with hyponatraemia. The mechanisms are unclear. Fluid retention, impaired cardiac and renal function are likely . Patients should be screened with plasma thyroid-stimulating hormone and T4 .
This condition arises by a negative water balance exceeding a concomitant negative cation balance (Equation 2). The resulting hypovolaemia is the most common condition in hospitalised hypernatraemic patients .
Diminished water intake is a pivotal mechanism of increased P-[Na+] . Individuals at risk of insufficient drinking often have an altered mental status (critical illness, sedation, neurological impairment) or they are intubated patients, infants  or geriatric patients .
An enhanced water above salt loss contributes to hypernatraemia. Fever is a common contributing factor [21, 97, 100]. A high loss through the skin can result from a high temperature in the environment, from exercise or wounds (for example, burns). Gastrointestinal loss of hypotonic fluid is increased by diarrhoea (for example, infection, lactulose).
A renal concentrating defect frequently contributes to hypernatraemia. Several mechanisms are responsible for this. Loop diuretics contribute, especially in the critically ill patient . Osmotic diuresis (U-Osm >300 mOsm with hypernatraemia) can be induced by hyperglycaemia. Osmotic urea diuresis is seen with excessive protein nutrition and protein wasting and diagnosed by increased electrolyte-free water excretion . Mannitol also induces osmotic diuresis. A renal concentrating defect is seen with kidney insufficiency. Rare causes are hypercalcaemia and potassium depletion.
The patient is treated by restoring the ECV and water deficit (Example 3 in Box 1).
This condition develops when the water balance is negative and the cation balance is normal. The reduction in ECV is far less than with a concomitant salt loss. Diminished water intake is obligatory . Individuals with reduced water intake (infants, old, debilitated patients) will have appropriate, maximally concentrated urine. Patients with a functionally decreased vasopressin response to hypertonicity (central or nephrogenic diabetes insipidus) only develop hypernatraemia when water intake is restricted (for example, critical illness). Diabetes insipidus occasionally develops in the critically ill patient (for example, by traumatic brain injury and late-phase septic shock) and U-Osm is inappropriately low. In rare situations, the set point for osmolality is directly increased due to cerebral disease resulting in essential hypernatraemia and reduced thirst at a given sodium concentration.
Treatment is restoration of the water deficit (Example 3 in Box 1). Water loss in central diabetes insipidus can be reduced with desmopressin. Treatment of nephrogenic diabetes insipidus is challenging and may comprise drug evaluation, correction of hypercalcaemia or hypokalaemia and low-solute diet to decrease urine volume and thiazides.
Hypernatraemia with increased ECV develops when the cation balance is positive, which is frequently observed in ICU-acquired hypernatraemia [6, 21]. Increased input of cations is mandatory. This is seen in conjunction with correction of water loss with 0.9% NaCl. Also, correction of hypokalaemia with hypertonic potassium-containing solutions (for example, 0.9% NaCl added 40 mmol KCl) may contribute to hypernatraemia. Hypernatraemia can be induced therapeutically with hypertonic saline to reduce ICP  or as a side effect seen with NaHCO3 treatment. In healthy individuals, an increased salt load is excreted in the urine [75, 76]. Natriuresis can be diminished in the critically ill patient with a reduced effective circulating volume and a low glomerular filtration rate . A diagnosis of solute overload is made from the history, water- and cation balances and, if available, weight changes. Salt intoxication outside the hospital is rare, but may arise by suicide attempts with soya sauce and by inappropriate administration of solute in nursery homes .
Treatment consists of creating a negative cation balance by reducing the cation input and increasing the cation output with diuretics or, rarely, dialysis.
Hypernatraemic patients are generally critically ill and it may be difficult to determine whether cerebral symptoms stem from hypernatraemia (decreased level of consciousness, irritability, hyper-reflexia, spasticity and seizures) or the underlying disease.
The first principle in treatment is ABC. Circulatory collapse/hypoperfusion is treated with infusion of 0.9% NaCl according to haemodynamic parameters (Figure 3) . This should be paralleled by investigation and treatment of the underlying mechanisms (for example, insulin, antibiotics and antipyretics). Clinical evaluation of volume status is notoriously imprecise, and the only sign may be cerebral symptoms in the elderly/infant [98, 99]. Next, total body solute cannot be measured in a clinical setting. Simple measures can be helpful (for example, history, weight, accumulated fluid/electrolyte balances and electrolyte-free water clearance to diagnose the mechanisms behind the hypernatraemia (Figure 3)). Finally, the water/cation balance is restored.
Too rapid P-[Na+] correction can provoke seizures, probably from cerebral oedema [107–110]. This has been linked with the brain cells' adaption to the hypertonic state by accumulation of solute . The relative reduction in tonicity results in cellular swelling. However, failure to correct the hypernatraemia is associated with higher mortality [111, 112]. No optimal correction ratehas been determined, but it has been suggested that it should not exceed 0.5 mmol/l/h . A practical approach is to decrease P-[Na+] 5 to 6 mmol/l the first hours (1 mmol/l/h) and then slow down the correction rate so the total correction is 12 mmol/l in 24 hours (0.5 mmol/l/h) [97, 98]. The change in tonicity is important. The measured P-[Na+] must therefore be corrected for any hyperglycaemia.
where [Na+]corrected is the measured P-[Na+] corrected for any hyperglycaemia and Target [Na+] is the desired P-[Na+] (Example 3 in Box 1). However, frequent measurements of P-[Na+], P-[K+] and P-[Glucose] and calculation of [Na+]corrected are necessary to avoid overcorrection.
In severe cases with renal failure, renal replacement therapy should be instituted. Here, the Na+ content in the replacement fluid/dialysate must be increased to the desired P-[Na+] by NaCl addition to avoid overly rapid correction .
Dysnatraemia is common in the critically ill patient and is associated with increased mortality. The case story illustrates common and important treatment problems in the hyponatraemic patient. The key principle in treatment and prevention is that P-[Na+] is determined by external water and cation balances. First, the patient should be treated according to an ABC approach to diminish secondary organ damage. Next, symptoms are critical when handling a patient with hyponatraemia. Severe symptoms are treated with 2 ml/kg 3% NaCl bolus infusions irrespective of the proposed time course. The goal is to reduce cerebral symptoms. The bolus therapy gives an immediate, controllable rise in P-[Na+]. A maximum of three boluses are given. In hyponatraemic patients, any correction exceeding 10 mmol/l/day must be avoided to reduce the risk of OD. Reduced vasopressin action and brisk diuresis are the most common mechanism and they must be counteracted by increasing water input and, if necessary, by desmopressin. The risk of overcorrection is associated with the mechanisms causing hyponatraemia. Traditional classifications according to volume status are notoriously difficult to apply in clinical practice. Moreover, multiple mechanisms are common and may easily be mixed. More than one mechanism must therefore be investigated for safe correction.
First and foremost, the patient in the case story develops hypernatraemia in the ICU because the problem is not addressed. Pivotal is treatment of the underlying diseases and restoration of the distorted water and salt balances based on knowledge of what determines P-[Na+]. Multiple combined mechanisms are common and must be identified. Importantly, hypernatraemia is not only a matter of water deficit, and treatment of a critically ill patient with an accumulated fluid balance of 20 litres and corresponding weight gain is not more water, but a negative cation balance. Reduction of P-[Na+]/plasma tonicity in hypernatraemia is important, but should not exceed 12 mmol/l/day to reduce the risk of rebounding brain oedema.
Conclusion: One bolus of 2 ml/kg 3% NaCl results in an immediate, controllable rise i P-[Na+] of about 2 mmol/l.
A 70 kg male with P-[Na+]1 = 112 mmol/l is given 1 litre of 0.9% NaCl and has a diuresis of 750 ml with U-[Na+] = 154 mmol/l and U-[K+] = 80 mmol/l over the next 12 h.
Conclusion: 0.9% NaCl worsens his hyponatraemia and SIADH is likely.
An 80 kg male is admitted with P-[Na+] = 158 mmol/l and P-[Glucose] = 32 mmol/l (577 mg/dl with a correction factor of 2.4 meq/l per 100 mg/dl increase in P-[Glucose]). What is his estimated water deficit?
So, he has an estimated water deficit of about 10 l. There is concomitant, reduced total body sodium because sodium is lost with the osmotic diuresis.
Exclude adrenal and thyroid insufficiency
airway, breathing and circulation
electrolyte free water clearance
cerebral salt wasting
fractional excretion of uric acid
magnetic resonance imaging
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug
syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone
total body water