Ultrasound-guided percutaneous tracheostomy in critically ill obese patients
© Guinot et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 16 January 2012
Accepted: 5 March 2012
Published: 5 March 2012
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous tracheostomy (PCT) and the incidence of complications in critically ill, obese patients.
Fifty consecutive patients were included in a prospective study in two surgical and critical care medicine departments. Obesity was defined as a body mass index (BMI) of at least 30 kg/m2. The feasibility of PCT and the incidence of complications were compared in obese patients (n = 26) and non-obese patients (n = 24). Results are expressed as the median (25th-75th percentile) or number (percentage).
The median BMIs were 34 kg/m2 (32-38) in the obese patient group and 25 kg/m2 (24-28) in the non-obese group (p < 0.001). The median times for tracheostomy were 10 min (8-14) in non-obese patients and 9 min (5-10) in obese-patients (p = 0.1). The overall complication rate was similar in obese and non-obese patient groups (35% vs. 33%, p = 0.92). Most complications were minor (hypotension, desaturation, tracheal cuff puncture and minor bleeding), with no differences between obese and non-obese groups. Bronchoscopic inspection revealed two cases of granuloma (8%) in obese patients. One non-obese patient developed a peristomal skin infection, which was treated with intravenous antibiotics. Ultrasound-guided PCT was possible in all enrolled patients and there were no surgical conversions or deaths.
This study demonstrated that US-guided PCT is feasible in obese patients with a low complication rate. Obesity may not constitute a contra-indication for US-guided PCT. A US examination provides information on cervical anatomy and hence modifies and guides choice of the PCT puncture site.
The increasing prevalence of obesity worldwide has prompted rapid growth in the proportion of obese patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). The management and care of such patients are complex since obesity is associated with a longer duration of mechanical ventilation and a longer stay in the ICU [1, 2]. During their stay in the ICU, obese patients may require tracheostomy; this procedure is commonly performed when ventilatory weaning fails or when prolonged mechanical ventilation is needed [3, 4]. Since the generalization of percutaneous tracheostomy (PCT), many different types of complication have been described . PCT under bronchoscopic control has been developed in this context. Bronchoscopy uses transillumination to indicate the puncture site, confirm the needle position, and control the dilatation and positioning of the tracheostomy tube [6–8]. However, bronchoscopy does not identify the vascular structures or the thyroid gland in the neck region and thus does not prevent complications linked to local organ lesions (punctured vessels or a punctured thyroid) . This is particularly true in obese patients, in whom anatomical landmarks may not be easily identified in a physical examination. Many authors have reported a higher incidence of complications in obese patients [10, 11].
In recent years, technical progress and low invasiveness have meant that ultrasound (US) is increasingly used in clinical practice in anesthesia and critical care . This is notably the case for improving procedures (central venous cannulation, arterial cannulation, and peripheral nerve block) in obese patients . With respect to PCT, several studies have demonstrated the value of US mapping of the neck region prior to PCT [14–16]. Indeed, US examination often modifies the puncture site with respect to that chosen solely on the basis of anatomical palpation data . Recently, Rajajee and colleagues  demonstrated the feasibility of US-guided PCT in a neurosurgical ICU. They also reported the safety of US-guided tracheostomy in three obese patients. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are no published data on the US-guided PCT procedure in obese patients.
Hence, the objectives of our study were to evaluate the feasibility of US guidance, describe any difficulties, and evaluate the incidence of complications in an obese population in surgical and medical critical care departments. We prospectively compared this obese population with a non-obese population.
Materials and methods
This study was a prospective, two-center cohort study of 50 consecutive patients. The protocol was approved by the local independent ethics committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes Nord Ouest, Amiens, France). All patients (or, for unconscious patients, the next of kin) gave their written informed consent to participation. We enrolled all patients who were hospitalized in the ICUs at Amiens University Hospital or Beauvais General Hospital and for whom PCT was indicated. Exclusion criteria were as follows: age under 18 years, coagulation disorders (platelet count of below 80,000 mm-3 and an international normalized ratio of at least 1.2), infection at the puncture site, and emergency tracheostomy.
The percutaneous tracheostomy technique
PCT was performed by using the single-step, progressive Ciaglia Blue Rhino technique, as described previously [18, 19]. The PCT set consisted of a puncture needle, a guide wire, a small dilator, a curved dilator with a hydrophilic coating, and a tracheostomy tube (Tracoe® experc dilatation set; Pouret Medical, Clichy, France).
The same US machine and probe were used in each center (Envisor® point-of-care system with a 12 to 3 MHz linear array probe; Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands). The protocol required three operators: one dealt with the airway while the other two performed the US-guided PCT (an assistant and an operator). All physicians had the same level of experience of PCT (with over 50 operations) and the same university-level training in the use of US in anesthesia and critical care medicine.
Classification of complications
Bleeding not requiring compression or administration of packed red blood cells
Bleeding requiring compression without blood transfusion
Bleeding requiring administration of packed blood cells
Hypoxemia (SpO2 of less than 90%) or hypotension (systolic arterial pressure of below 100 mm Hg) for less than 5 minutes or both
Posterior tracheal wall injury but not requiring surgical repair
Difficult puncture or multiple punctures (more than three)
Posterior tracheal wall injury requiring surgical repair
Puncture of the tracheal tube cuff
Peristomal infection not requiring antibiotic treatment
Peristomal infection requiring local care or antibiotic treatment or both
Malposition of the tracheostomy tube (pre-tracheal or para-tracheal insertion)
Loss of airway
Tracheal ring fracture
The following data were collected: gender, age in years, height in meters, weight in kilograms, body mass index (BMI), the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), diagnosis on hospitalization, duration of mechanical ventilation prior to PCT (in days), indication for tracheostomy, anatomical palpation data (short neck, palpated goiter, deviation of the trachea, vessels, puncture site, and cricoid-manubrium distance in centimeters), US data (thyroid, tracheal deviation, aberrant vessels, puncture site, subcutaneous tissue thickness (in centimeters) defined by the distance between the skin and the anterior wall of the trachea measured perpendicularly to the skin at the puncture level, tracheal diameter in centimeters, and installation time in minutes), the duration of the tracheostomy defined by the time (in minutes) between the puncture of the trachea and the ventilation of the patient, difficulty in achieving US-guided PCT (rated on a simple numerical scale; 1: easy; 2: a few difficulties in identifying anatomical structures and in implementation; 3: moderate difficulties in identifying anatomical structures; 4: very difficult; and 5: impossible), hemodynamic data before and after the completion of PCT (blood pressure in millimeters of mercury and heart rate in beats per minute), and complications.
Data were expressed as the median (25th to 75th percentiles) or number (percentage). Obesity was defined as a BMI of at least 30 kg/m2. We compared the group of obese patients with the group of non-obese patients. A non-parametric Mann-Whitney test was used for inter-group comparisons of continuous variables. Categorical variables were compared by using a chi-squared test (and a Yates correction if necessary) or a Fisher exact test. A P value of not more than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed by using SPSS Statistics 18 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA).
Demographic data for the overall study population and in the obese and non-obese subgroups
(n = 50)
(n = 26)
(n = 24)
Body mass index, kg/m2
Diagnosis on admission
Acute respiratory distress syndrome
MV before tracheostomy, days
Time to decannulation, days
Anatomical and ultrasound data
Anatomical and ultrasound-guided percutaneous tracheostomy data in the overall study population and in the obese and non-obese subgroups
(n = 50)
(n = 26)
(n = 24)
Cricoid-manubrium distance, cm
Subcutaneous tissue thickness, cm
Trachea diameter, cm
Ultrasound examination time, minutes
Percutaneous tracheostomy time, minutes
Total time, minutes
2: A few difficulties
3: Moderate difficulties
4: Very difficult
The ultrasound-guided technique
The median total time was 18 minutes (15 to 25). The overall PCT procedure consisted of an initial US examination of the neck region, lasting 10 minutes (5 to 12), and a US-guided implementation phase, also lasting 10 minutes (5 to 12). These times were similar in the two groups (Table 3). The physician decided to change the puncture site in 25 cases (50%) because of tracheal coverage by the thyroid (n = 8, 32%) or aberrant vessels (n = 16, 64%) or tracheal deviation (n = 11, 44%) or a combination of these. Identification of the anatomical structures and the PCT guidance were considered to be easy in 24 patients (48%), moderately difficult in 16 patients (32%), difficult in nine patients (18%), and very difficult in one patient (2%). No difference was observed when comparing obese and non-obese patients. It was possible to carry out all PCTs with US guidance. No surgical conversions occurred.
Complications in the overall study population and in the obese and non-obese subgroups
(n = 50)
(n = 26)
(n = 24)
Desaturation: SpO2 < 90%
Tracheal cuff puncture
Bleeding less than 5 mL
Fractured tracheal ring
Our results demonstrate that PCT can be performed in obese patients under real-time US guidance and with a short completion time. The majority of complications were minor ones (hypotension, desaturation, minor bleeding, and puncture of the tracheal tube cuff) and did not differ in their prevalences in obese and non-obese patients. We did not observe any life-threatening complications.
Several studies have emphasized the value of pre-PCT US examination of the neck region to reduce the incidence of complications [14–16, 20–25]. Recently, Rajajee and colleagues  demonstrated the feasibility of US guidance during the implementation of PCT in a population of neuro-intensive care patients. Our results confirm the feasibility of this procedure in a larger and more heterogeneous cohort of intensive care patients (even obese ones). Obesity is usually considered to be a relative contraindication to PCT because anatomical conditions can make it difficult to properly identify the patient's anatomical landmarks. Despite a shorter cricoid-manubrium distance, a greater trachea-skin distance, and a shorter neck in our study cohort, US was able to visualize the puncture level, the path of the needle, the tracheal puncture, and all other stages of the procedure (insertion of the needle, the dilator, and then the tube) in real time. Furthermore, the physicians reported that US was easy to use in 80% of cases, even in obese patients. The completion time for US-guided PCT was similar to that for PCT in the absence of US guidance . Furthermore, the fact that the completion time in obese patients was similar to that recorded in non-obese patients emphasizes the feasibility of US guidance in this specific population.
By using standardized definitions to evaluate the incidence and severity of complications (particularly in obese patients), we observed a lower incidence of complications than reported in the literature [10, 11]. In our study, the majority of complications were minor ones with little or no clinical significance (minor bleeding and short periods of hypotension or desaturation). None of the obese patients had major complications. Moreover, we did not observe late complications, such as tracheal stenosis. The use of US guidance may account for these results since this modality is probably more informative than bronchoscopy in terms of identification of the cervical anatomy and puncture site. Many surgical teams perform bronchoscopy-guided PCT. However, Walz and Schmidt  highlighted the discrepancy between the palpated landmarks and the actual level of puncture during fiber-optic monitoring. Massick and colleagues  found that the occurrence of complications was linked to the difficulty in identifying anatomical features. Given that obese patients have shorter and thicker necks, bronchoscopy transillumination cannot indicate the puncture site or identify pre-tracheal vessels. In a study by Byhahn and colleagues , bronchoscopy-guided PCT was five times more likely to result in serious adverse events in obese patients than in non-obese patients. Nevertheless, most of the complications could be anticipated by using US examination of the neck to identify the pre-tracheal tissue mass, subcutaneous vessels, and the trachea's axis. US has the advantage of identifying aberrant vessels (damage to which can otherwise cause bleeding [25, 28]) and better defining the location and vascularization of the thyroid. In our cohort, US guidance prompted a change in the puncture site in 50% of patients in order to avoid pre-tracheal vessels and better center the PCT site. Romero and colleagues  used similar reasoning to demonstrate the safety of fiber-optic bronchoscopy-assisted PCT. However, in the latter protocol, patients underwent a pre-PCT US examination to identify vascular structures and select the optimal PCT site. The ability of US to provide this anatomical information may explain the low incidence of serious complications (such as major bleeding) observed in our obese patients. As with bronchoscopy, US allowed us to focus the puncture point on the trachea and thus avoid poor tracheal tube positioning. Hence, we did not observe any complications related to malposition of the tracheostomy (for example, pre-tracheal or para-tracheal insertion) or puncture of the posterior tracheal wall.
One limitation of the use of US is the required level of anatomical knowledge of the neck (especially among critically ill obese patients). All of the practitioners in our study had been trained by a radiologist on the anatomy of neck as revealed by US. Even so, the cervical anatomy was identified with great difficulty in 10 patients (20%) but did not prevent PCT. There were several reasons for this great difficulty. Short, thick necks limited our ability to carry out a US examination. The presence of a large, hypoechoic, anterior venous maze could have hindered guidance of the needle. Another difficulty was in identifying the balloon of the endotracheal tube with sonography; the tracheal tube cuff was perforated in six cases (12%). Visualization of the balloon was partly improved by using a double-contrast technique (that is, a balloon inflated with water). However, this technique was non-optimal because the air around the tracheal tube could act as an artefact for US. Two other studies reported a rate of tracheal tube cuff puncture of 13% to 17% for bronchoscopy-guided PCT [30, 31]. Even though US cannot correctly identify the tracheal tube cuff, the use of this modality did not seem to increase the rate of tracheal tube cuff puncture. One patient suffered a cricoid fracture; the chosen puncture site was moved nearer to the head because of the thickness of the US probe and the guiding in out-of-plane mode. The lack of differences between obese and non-obese patient groups in terms of the completion time, difficulty rating, and incidence of complications prompts us to consider that obesity is not a limiting factor for the use of US guidance. Our study included few morbidly obese patients who may represent a group of patients for whom US would be more informative. None of the five morbidly obese patients had complications. Another limitation of our prospective cohort study related to the fact that we did not use a high-powered, non-inferiority methodology with an adequate sample size. However, our goals were to evaluate the feasibility of US guidance and to describe the implementation difficulty and occurrence of complications in a critically obese population rather than demonstrate the non-inferiority of US guidance relative to fiber-optic bronchoscopy guidance. Furthermore, at the time we designed our study, there were no available data on US-guided PCT in this type of population. The indications and contraindications are yet to be determined in larger cohorts. The role of US guidance (particularly in relation to bronchoscopy) remains to be clarified in prospective studies. The extrapolation of our results to other teams (with little or no training in US or cervical anatomy) might be a concern. A learning curve might well be required before the technique can be incorporated into routine use.
US-guided PCT can be performed in obese patients, and the incidence of complications is low. Use of US provides a better understanding of the anatomy of the neck, prevents vascular puncture, and helps guide the tracheostomy procedure. Obesity does not appear to limit the implementation of US-guided tracheostomy.
Ultrasound-guided percutaneous tracheostomy is feasible in obese patients and has a low complication rate.
Ultrasound provides a better understanding of the anatomy of the neck, prevents vascular puncture, and helps guide the tracheostomy procedure.
body mass index
intensive care unit
The study was performed at Amiens University Hospital and Beauvais General Hospital and was approved by the institutional review board of Amiens University Hospital.
- Flegal KM, Graubard BI, Williamson DF, Gail MH: Excess deaths associated with underweight, overweight, and obesity. JAMA 2005, 293: 1861-1867. 10.1001/jama.293.15.1861View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Akinnusi ME, Pineda LA, El Solh AA: Effect of obesity on intensive care morbidity and mortality: a meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 2008, 36: 151-158. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000297885.60037.6EView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blot F, Melot C: Indications, timing, and techniques of tracheostomy in 152 French ICUs. Chest 2005, 127: 1347-1352. 10.1378/chest.127.4.1347View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Freeman BD, Isabella K, Lin N, Buchman TG: A meta-analysis of prospective trials comparing percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients. Chest 2000, 118: 1412-1418. 10.1378/chest.118.5.1412View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Delaney A, Bagshaw SM, Nalos M: Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 2006, 10: R55. 10.1186/cc4887PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Winkler WB, Karnik R, Seelmann O, Havlicek J, Slany J: Bedside percutaneous dilational tracheostomy with endoscopic guidance: experience with 71 ICU patients. Intensive Care Med 1994, 20: 476-479. 10.1007/BF01711898View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kost KM: Endoscopic percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy: a prospective evaluation of 500 consecutive cases. Laryngoscope 2005, 115: 1-30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barba CA, Angood PB, Kauder DR, Latenser B, Martin K, McGonigal MD, Phillips GR, Rotondo MF, Schwab CW: Bronchoscopic guidance makes percutaneous tracheostomy a safe, cost-effective, and easy-to-teach procedure. Surgery 1995, 118: 879-883. 10.1016/S0039-6060(05)80279-XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reilly PM, Anderson HL, Sing RF, Schwab CW, Bartlett RH: Occult hypercarbia. An unrecognized phenomenon during percutaneous endoscopic tracheostomy. Chest 1995, 107: 1760-1763. 10.1378/chest.107.6.1760View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Byhahn C, Lischke V, Meininger D, Halbig S, Westphal K: Peri-operative complications during percutaneous tracheostomy in obese patients. Anaesthesia 2005, 60: 12-15. 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03707.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aldawood AS, Arabi YM, Haddad S: Safety of percutaneous tracheostomy in obese critically ill patients: a prospective cohort study. Anaesth Intensive Care 2008, 36: 69-73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hatfield A, Bodenham A: Ultrasound: an emerging role in anaesthesia and intensive care. Br J Anaesth 1999, 83: 789-800.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Balki M, Lee Y, Halpern S, Carvalho JC: Ultrasound imaging of the lumbar spine in the transverse plane: the correlation between estimated and actual depth to the epidural space in obese parturients. Anesth Analg 2009, 108: 1876-1881. 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a323f6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hatfield A, Bodenham A: Portable ultrasonic scanning of the anterior neck before percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. Anaesthesia 1999, 54: 660-663. 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.00859.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bonde J, Norgaard N, Antonsen K, Faber T: Implementation of percutaneous dilation tracheotomy: value of preincisional ultrasonic examination? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1999, 43: 163-166. 10.1034/j.1399-6576.1999.430207.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sustic A, Zupan Z, Antoncic I: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy with laryngeal mask airway control in a morbidly obese patient. J Clin Anesth 2004, 16: 121-123. 10.1016/j.jclinane.2003.04.005View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kollig E, Heydenreich U, Roetman B, Hopf F, Muhr G: Ultrasound and bronchoscopic controlled percutaneous tracheostomy on trauma ICU. Injury 2000, 31: 663-668. 10.1016/S0020-1383(00)00094-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rajajee V, Fletcher JJ, Rochlen LR, Jacobs TL: Real-time ultrasound-guided percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: a feasibility study. Crit Care 2011, 15: R67. 10.1186/cc10047PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Byhahn C, Wilke HJ, Halbig S, Lischke V, Westphal K: Percutaneous tracheostomy: ciaglia blue rhino versus the basic ciaglia technique of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. Anesth Analg 2000, 91: 882-886. 10.1097/00000539-200010000-00021View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Flint AC, Midde R, Rao VA, Lasman TE, Ho PT: Bedside ultrasound screening for pretracheal vascular structures may minimize the risks of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. Neurocrit Care 2009, 11: 372-376. 10.1007/s12028-009-9259-zView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sustic A, Kovac D, Zgaljardic Z, Zupan Z, Krstulovic B: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: a safe method to avoid cranial misplacement of the tracheostomy tube. Intensive Care Med 2000, 26: 1379-1381. 10.1007/s001340000589View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sustic A, Zupan Z, Eskinja N, Dirlic A, Bajek G: Ultrasonographically guided percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy after anterior cervical spine fixation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1999, 43: 1078-1080. 10.1034/j.1399-6576.1999.431019.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Singh M, Chin KJ, Chan VW, Wong DT, Prasad GA, Yu E: Use of sonography for airway assessment: an observational study. J Ultrasound Med 2010, 29: 79-85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reilly PM, Sing RF, Giberson FA, Anderson HL, Rotondo MF, Tinkoff GH, Schwab CW: Hypercarbia during tracheostomy: a comparison of percutaneous endoscopic, percutaneous Doppler, and standard surgical tracheostomy. Intensive Care Med 1997, 23: 859-864. 10.1007/s001340050422View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- King D: Preventing bleeding complications in percutaneous tracheostomy - another role for portable ultrasound in intensive care. Br J Anaesth 2003, 91: 607. 10.1093/bja/aeg615View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Walz MK, Schmidt U: Tracheal lesion caused by percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: a clinico-pathological study. Intensive Care Med 1999, 25: 102-105. 10.1007/s001340050794View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Massick DD, Powell DM, Price PD, Chang SL, Squires G, Forrest LA, Young DC: Quantification of the learning curve for percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy. Laryngoscope 2000, 110: 222-228. 10.1097/00005537-200002010-00007View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shlugman D, Satya-Krishna R, Loh L: Acute fatal haemorrhage during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. Br J Anaesth 2003, 90: 517-520. 10.1093/bja/aeg074View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Romero CM, Cornejo RA, Ruiz MH, Gálvez LR, Llanos OP, Tobar EA, Larrondo JF, Castro JS: Fiberoptic bronchoscopy-assisted percutaneous tracheostomy is safe in obese critically ill patients: a prospective and comparative study. J Crit Care 2009, 24: 494-500. 10.1016/j.jcrc.2008.06.001View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Holdgaard HO, Pederson J, Jensen RH, Outzen KE, Midtgaard T, Johansen LV, Møller J, Paaske PB: Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus conventional surgical tracheostomy. A clinical randomised study. Acta Anesthesiol Scand 1998, 42: 545-550. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb05164.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fikkers BG, Staatsen M, van den Hoogen FJ, van der Hoeven JG: Early and late outcome after single step dilatational tracheostomy versus the guide wire dilating forceps technique: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Intensive Care Med 2011, 37: 1103-1109. 10.1007/s00134-011-2222-4PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.